美國(guó)essay寫(xiě)作-美國(guó)的行政保護(hù)主義

1、essay 寫(xiě)作網(wǎng)（www.lxws.net）--專業(yè)留學(xué)生作業(yè)輔導(dǎo)中心美倫論文網(wǎng)（Meeloun）為留學(xué)生提供高效、優(yōu)質(zhì)的論文服務(wù)美國(guó) essay 寫(xiě)作-美國(guó)的行政保護(hù)主義American administrative protectionism can be divided into two types: binding and non-binding administrative protectionism. The core

2、of non-binding administrative protectionism is strategic deterrence, which aims to achieve trade protectionism without war. Binding administrative protectionism can be divided into technical route protectionism and polit

3、ical route protectionism. The analysis of the types of American administrative protectionism will help us to gain insight into the formulation and adjustment rules of American government's trade policies, so as to

4、predict, avoid and resolve American trade protectionism against China.美國(guó)的行政保護(hù)主義可分為兩類:約束性行政保護(hù)主義和非約束性行政保護(hù)主義。非約束性行政保護(hù)主義的核心是戰(zhàn)略威懾，其目的是實(shí)現(xiàn)非戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義。約束性行政保護(hù)主義可分為技術(shù)路線保護(hù)主義和政治路線保護(hù)主義。分析美國(guó)行政保護(hù)主義的類型，有助于我們深入了解美國(guó)政府貿(mào)易政策的制定 和調(diào)整規(guī)則，從而預(yù)測(cè)、避免

5、和解決美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)的貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義。Questions about the future direction of U.S. trade policy are coming to the fore in an increasingly difficult global economy, with the Democratic Party emerging from the presidential election. Protectioni

6、sm must have a place in the Obama administration's trade policy, according to democratic tradition and Obama's pre-election rhetoric. At present, the study of trade protectionism in the United States is basicall

7、y a general study. However, in fact, protectionism generated by different actors has different forms, core views and essence, and different methods should be used to identify and prevent it. Therefore, it is still necess

8、ary to study classified trade protectionism. This paper attempts to analyze in detail the trade protectionism generated under the action of the us administrative department, namely, administrative protectionism, which i

9、s helpful for us to have an insight into the formulation and adjustment rules of the us government's trade policies, with a view to predicting, evading and resolving the us trade protectionism against China.隨著民主黨從總統(tǒng)

10、選舉中脫穎而出，在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)日益困難的情況下，有關(guān)美國(guó)貿(mào)易政策未來(lái)方向的問(wèn)題正成為人們關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。根據(jù)民主黨的傳統(tǒng)和奧巴馬 競(jìng)選前的花言巧語(yǔ)，保護(hù)主義必須在奧巴馬政府的貿(mào)易政策中占有一席之地。 目前，對(duì)美國(guó)貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義的研究基本上是一個(gè)概括性的研究。然而，事實(shí)上，不同的行為主體所產(chǎn)生的保護(hù)主義有不同的形式、核心觀點(diǎn)和本質(zhì)，需要 用不同的方法來(lái)識(shí)別和防范。因此，仍有必要對(duì)分類貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義進(jìn)行研究。本文詳細(xì)分析美國(guó)貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義的作用下生成的行

11、政部門(mén),即行政保護(hù)主義,這有 利于我們有一個(gè)深入的了解美國(guó)政府制定和調(diào)整規(guī)則的貿(mào)易政策,以預(yù)測(cè),解決和 規(guī)避美國(guó)針對(duì)中國(guó)的貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義。According to the forms of administrative protectionism, it can be divided into two types: non-binding administrative protectionism and binding administ

12、rative protectionism.根據(jù)行政保護(hù)主義的表現(xiàn)形式，可以分為兩類:非約束性行政保護(hù)主義和約束性essay 寫(xiě)作網(wǎng)（www.lxws.net）--專業(yè)留學(xué)生作業(yè)輔導(dǎo)中心美倫論文網(wǎng)（Meeloun）為留學(xué)生提供高效、優(yōu)質(zhì)的論文服務(wù)although us policies have their irrationality, they are based on us trade laws and supported by t

13、he us congress and the public.美國(guó)的外交政策是由美國(guó)公眾和國(guó)會(huì)決定的。非約束性行政保護(hù)主義也是如 此，公眾和國(guó)會(huì)是行政部門(mén)實(shí)現(xiàn)其目標(biāo)的首選工具。正是因?yàn)檫@一原因,當(dāng)外國(guó)政府起訴美國(guó)貿(mào)易法,在 WTO 爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制違反世貿(mào)組織的原則,美國(guó)官員通常 認(rèn)為,盡管美國(guó)的政策有其非理性,他們是基于美國(guó)貿(mào)易法律和美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)和公眾的支持。The administration USES the public to deter

14、 trading partners. Scholars such as Kenneth f. scheve believe that there are three explanations for the rise of trade protectionism in the United States after the cold war: one is the narrow industrial interests, the ot

15、her is the government's failure to make the benefits of globalization public, and the third is the war on terrorism. But none of this is a major factor. The underlying reason is that real incomes have stagnated or f

16、allen in the face of rising economic wealth in the United States. According to the theory of comparative advantage, trade should maximize the economic welfare of the country and its citizens, but the fact is that trade n

17、ot only makes American workers lose their jobs, but also their sources of income. So, while economists think of comparative advantage is the most wonderful ideas in “economics“, but the public thought it “l(fā)ike a light d

18、usting, provide vision about free trade looks cold and didn't care about now, now, the pain of the local public,“, “is just an imagination of comparative advantage theory, free trade is not well disposed toward us,“

19、. This scepticism is widespread among the public.In foreign trade negotiations, therefore, the President often bypasses congressional leaders and political elites to inform the public directly and issue non-binding admin

20、istrative protectionism at the will of the public. According to statistics, since the early 20th century, presidents have said more to the public and less to congress. Since 1900, 50% of presidential speeches have been

21、directed at the public.Protectionism is inherent in congress, and the executive branch often USES congress for its own purposes. The executive branch can be divided into two situations with the help of congress: one is

22、that the executive branch takes the initiative to use congress to put pressure on trading partners. In April 1999, Zhu Longji's visit to the United States and bring the United States “a unilateral commitments for ac

23、cession to the wto of China's long cuts list“, but the government rejected the proposal, fantasy to get more concessions, its reason is “the current congressional opposition to China's accession to the wto'

24、s voice is very big, unless the government can resist congress of fire“ bullet-proof agreement “. As a matter of fact, the inaction of the administrative department has formed administrative protectionism. The other is

25、 the passive use of congress by the executive branch. This stems largely from the objective lessons of the administration's battles with congress. Under the constitution, congress has supreme trade power, and in the