采煤機(jī)畢業(yè)論文外文翻譯

1、<p><b>　　英文原文</b></p><p>　　Utilisation of Data Mining in Mining Industry:</p><p>　　Improvement of the Shearer Loader Productivity in Underground Mines</p><p>　　I. I

2、NTRODUCTION</p><p>　　The longwall system is the heart of the coal mining process. It is considered to have a simple layout but requires stringent adherence to some basic features in the development of the pa

3、nel to make it work. Similarly, in order to produce the required business production volume, all critical equipments must operate to their required level of service according to the system’s established operating mission

4、 profile. The integrated nature of production system demands that all units or sub-systems sho</p><p>　　increasing failure rate of the overall system. This unreliable condition only holds true in the absence

5、 of correct and auditable strategic maintenance and reliability policy, management systems and procedures in place. In this industrial case a substantial amount of time is being put together to systematically extract the

6、 appropriate data and analyse a few factors. The factors include the cause of failure, current maintenance regime, maintenance system and procedures, quality of computerised equ</p><p>　　shortcomings.</p&

7、gt;<p>　　The goal of this study is to develop a procedure to optimize maintenance plan for the Shearer Loader that would minimize costly production losses and improve reliability. The program is to consider long-t

8、erm plant operation (with possible equipment life extension) by continuing with processes that have provided excellent past performance, proceeding with existing maintenance improvement programs, and recommend new cost e

9、ffective maintenance task.</p><p>　　This study aimed at achieving the following objectives to drive delivery of the end goal:</p><p>　　1) To identify a cost-effective maintenance strategy by rev

10、iewing, rationalising and optimising existing maintenance task.</p><p>　　2) Apply design methodology in order to increase the level of service from its current performance; improve life cycle cost and reliab

11、ility of the Shearer over its design mission life.</p><p>　　3) To develop guidelines for operation and maintenance integration</p><p>　　4) Identify effective means of recording and utilising mea

12、ningful reliability data for performance analysis.</p><p>　　5) Ensure plant equipment is maintained appropriately byconsidering its importance to safety, reliability, and availability.</p><p>　　

13、The study also highlighted the significance of risk based assessment methodology such as FMEA/FMECA, Planned Maintenance Optimisation (PMO). The practice and principles of reliability and maintainability modelling has pr

14、oven to generate increased profitability among world leader in mining industry. This method was found useful as an effective planning and operational tool for automatic and highly complex mine production system while emp

15、loying almost without redundancy high cost critical equipmen</p><p>　　II. THE FUNCTION OF THE SHEARER LOADER</p><p>　　The shearer loader installed in the underground mining is a Double Ended Ran

16、ging Drum Shearer (DERDS) equipped with outboard ranging arms. It is designed and manufactured to extract and load coal into the Armoured Face Conveyor which is also a critical integral part of the longwall mining system

17、. The Shearer operates within a minimum seam range of 1.8 metres and a maximum of 3.0 metres with an undercut of not less than 150mm with a 1000mm web. The Shearer is also capable of both Half Web and Bi-</p><

18、p>　　Longwall, in a 40 week operating year, with a weekly average of 100,000 tonnes. This operating schedule allows for two Longwall moves per year. The Shearer Loader is expected to achieve the equipment availability

19、of not less than 98% of any given month, when operated 5-days a week (106 hours per week). Figure 1 shows the major components of the shearer loader.</p><p>　　III. RELIABILITY ISSUES AND RISK ASSESSMENT METH

20、ODOLOGY</p><p>　　The shearer failed to meet the availability performance target within the period due to several preventable failure modes that causes business interruptions. A SWOT analysis that was conduct

21、ed from the start of this study shows the following factors directly impacting the shearer performance;</p><p>　　1. Planning and scheduling done in ad-hoc basis</p><p>　　2. Equipment hierarchy l

22、imited to high level and does not capture failure modes to its component and sub-system component</p><p>　　3. Compliance to maintenance schedule is inconsistent</p><p>　　4. Poor data utilisation

23、</p><p>　　5. Backlog not measured</p><p>　　6. Work order package incomplete (SWMS, JSA, drawings, BOM,etc.)</p><p>　　A reliability analysis and comprehensive Failure Mode Effect and

24、 Criticality (FMECA) were carried out to identify failure rates of individual critical maintainable items and failure modes. The outcome of this process concluded with chronic reappearance of the same failed maintainable

25、 items caused by the same failure modes and failure mechanism that is causing the loss of its function. A Pareto analysis was used to identify a list of problems, using criteria of highest total revenue loss, breakdo<

26、/p><p>　　relationships govern everything that happens and as such are the path to effective problem solving [5]. This cause and effect relationship identifies failure modes highlighted in in the FMECA process.

27、Furthermore, additional business interruption is also driven by other cause factors with the most number of downtime as follows:</p><p>　　1.Electrical system failure</p><p>　　2.Control and monit

28、oring system failure</p><p>　　3.Mechanical haulage failure</p><p>　　IV. FIELD DATA COLLECTION & FEEDBACK</p><p>　　Data collection from the field and on-line monitoring system mu

29、st be accurate and realistic. It provides a starting point of generating formal failure-reporting document and ensures that the feedback is both consistent and adequate [6]. PULSE is a Computerised Maintenance Management

30、 System (CMMS) used currently in the underground mine. It is a central database and a depository of all pertinent data relating to the Plant Register.</p><p>　　The system is capable of providing the followin

31、g information:</p><p>　　1.Work order type and priority</p><p>　　2.Selecting maintenance type</p><p>　　3.Raising requisition from work order</p><p>　　4.Equipment informa

32、tion and Bill of Materials (BOM)</p><p>　　5.Equipment history</p><p>　　6.Suppliers information and cost reporting</p><p>　　7.Estimates (time and labour information)</p><p

33、>　　8.Real time capture of the operating time of the asset in a 24-hours/day</p><p>　　The system also provides links to other critical information to effectively carry out the required work such as:</p&

34、gt;<p>　　1.Job plans/ Standard works</p><p>　　2.Safe work procedures</p><p>　　3.Work Permits</p><p>　　4.Risk assessment</p><p>　　5.Drawings and other technical r

35、eferences</p><p>　　The software organises the equipment hierarchy starting from the Plant Register level and extending:</p><p>　　1.Two levels downwards, to Sub-Assembly and Component;</p>

36、<p>　　2.Two levels upwards, to Plant Group and Site Code.</p><p>　　Outside the Plant Hierarchy, PULSE uses a user defined key field,"Location", which is intended to indicate the equipment’s p

37、hysical location within the site’s boundaries.</p><p>　　V. CONCLUSION</p><p>　　The global trend in longwall coal mining production system is towards ever increasing productivity with the least o

38、perating and maintaining cost possible. This trend is reflected nowhere better than in the increasing production expectations from the existing longwall installation and the next generation of longwall installation. Subs

39、equently, the demand for the shearer loader to increase longwall production is accompanied by the increased in the level of service and high level of automation to e</p><p><b>　　中文譯文</b></p>

40、;<p><b>　　I.介紹</b></p><p>　　長壁煤炭開采過程中系統(tǒng)的心臟。它被認(rèn)為是有一個(gè)簡單的布局，但需要嚴(yán)格遵守的面板，使其工作在發(fā)展的一些基本特征。同樣，以產(chǎn)生所需的業(yè)務(wù)產(chǎn)量，所有關(guān)鍵設(shè)備必須工作到他們所需的服務(wù)級(jí)別，根據(jù)系統(tǒng)的建立工作任務(wù)剖面。生產(chǎn)系統(tǒng)的綜合性質(zhì)，要求所有單位或子系統(tǒng)應(yīng)該能夠在可接受的水平，可靠性，實(shí)現(xiàn)計(jì)劃生產(chǎn)。高生產(chǎn)力的井下長壁開采設(shè)備

41、是非常昂貴的，它需要適當(dāng)?shù)脑u估每個(gè)組件的維護(hù)管理可維護(hù)性。希勒用于在工作面的煤炭，其故障是災(zāi)難性的財(cái)務(wù)條款。因此，它的可用性是一個(gè)必須為經(jīng)濟(jì)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展項(xiàng)目。如果采煤機(jī)不能有效地工作，這可能會(huì)降低效率的整個(gè)生產(chǎn)體系[1]。煤炭年產(chǎn)量400萬噸的目標(biāo)在高度機(jī)械化采煤機(jī)的情況下，建立了實(shí)現(xiàn)全年收入目標(biāo)。要做到這一點(diǎn)的生產(chǎn)力水平，采煤機(jī)預(yù)計(jì)在106小時(shí)，每星期工作在40周營運(yùn)年度，并允許在一年內(nèi)只有兩個(gè)工作面移動(dòng)。這種緊密的目標(biāo)似乎是不現(xiàn)實(shí)的

42、，考慮到目前的增加了整個(gè)系統(tǒng)的故障率。這種靠不住的情況缺乏正確和可審計(jì)的戰(zhàn)略維護(hù)和可靠性的政策，管理制度和程序，只有擁有真正的。在這個(gè)工業(yè)的情況下，大量時(shí)間被放在一起，系統(tǒng)中提取相應(yīng)的數(shù)據(jù)，并分析了幾個(gè)因素。這些因素包括失敗的原因，目前的保</p><p>　　這項(xiàng)研究的目標(biāo)是開發(fā)一個(gè)程序來優(yōu)化維修計(jì)劃，采煤機(jī)，將最大限度地減少昂貴的生產(chǎn)損失，提高供電可靠性。該計(jì)劃是要考慮長期的工廠操作（有可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致設(shè)備壽命延長

43、），通過持續(xù)的過程，提供了優(yōu)異的過往表現(xiàn)，繼續(xù)與現(xiàn)有的維修改進(jìn)方案，并建議新的成本有效的維護(hù)任務(wù)。</p><p>　　本研究旨在實(shí)現(xiàn)以下目標(biāo)驅(qū)動(dòng)交付的最終目標(biāo)：</p><p>　　1）要找出一個(gè)符合成本效益的維護(hù)策略，通過審查，合理化和優(yōu)化現(xiàn)有的維護(hù)任務(wù)。</p><p>　　2）應(yīng)用設(shè)計(jì)的方法，以提高服務(wù)水平，從目前的表現(xiàn)，希勒在其設(shè)計(jì)任務(wù)壽命，提高生命周期成

44、本和可靠性。</p><p>　　3）制定政策，操作和維護(hù)一體化</p><p>　　4）確定進(jìn)行性能分析的有意義的可靠性數(shù)據(jù)的記錄和利用的有效手段。</p><p>　　5）確保工廠設(shè)備保持適當(dāng)byconsidering其安全性，可靠性和可用性的重要性。</p><p>　　該研究還強(qiáng)調(diào)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估為基礎(chǔ)的方法，如FMEA / FMECA的意義

45、，計(jì)劃維護(hù)優(yōu)化（PMO）。的做法和原則已被證明的可靠性和可維護(hù)性建模生成在世界領(lǐng)先的采礦業(yè)的 盈利能力增加。此方法可作為一個(gè)有效的規(guī)劃和操作的工具，自動(dòng)化和高度復(fù)雜的礦井生產(chǎn)系統(tǒng)，而采用幾乎沒有冗余成本高，關(guān)鍵設(shè)備，即采煤機(jī)。這是可以合理的投資回報(bào)率（ROI）更長的平均無故障時(shí)間，之前預(yù)定的維護(hù)任務(wù)可能會(huì)干擾[2-3]。這項(xiàng)研究期間，如果數(shù)據(jù)被開采和分析，是2月 - 2010年8月。有趣的是，積極改善采煤機(jī)的性能已被觀察到初以來實(shí)

46、施的分析結(jié)果。</p><p><b>　　二。采煤機(jī)的功能</b></p><p>　　安裝在地下開采的采煤機(jī)是一個(gè)雙端測距滾筒采煤機(jī)（DERDS）配備舷外搖臂。它的設(shè)計(jì)和制造，提取和加載到刮板輸送機(jī)，這也是一個(gè)重要的組成部分的長壁開采系統(tǒng)煤炭。希勒縫范圍內(nèi)最低為1.8米和3.0米，底切不小于150mm，1000mm的網(wǎng)頁最多。希勒還能夠兩個(gè)半Web和雙向切割和裝載

47、全煤部分在額定容量，實(shí)現(xiàn)了生產(chǎn)的要求從4.0萬噸長壁，在40周的經(jīng)營年度，平均每周為100,000噸。此作業(yè)時(shí)間表允許每年的兩個(gè)長壁移動(dòng)。有望實(shí)現(xiàn)采煤機(jī)運(yùn)行時(shí)，設(shè)備利用率不低于98％的任何一個(gè)月，每周5天（106小時(shí)，每星期）。圖1示出的采煤機(jī)的主要組成部分。</p><p>　　III。可靠性問題和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估方法</p><p>　　采煤機(jī)未能滿足可用性性能目標(biāo)的期間內(nèi)，由于一些可預(yù)防的故

48、障模式，會(huì)導(dǎo)致業(yè)務(wù)中斷。本研究從一開始就進(jìn)行的SWOT分析顯示下列因素直接影響采煤機(jī)性能;</p><p>　　1。在特設(shè)的基礎(chǔ)規(guī)劃和調(diào)度</p><p>　　2。僅限于較高水平，設(shè)備層次不捕獲它的組件和子系統(tǒng)組件的故障模式</p><p>　　3。符合維護(hù)時(shí)間表不一致</p><p><b>　　4。數(shù)據(jù)利用差</b>

49、</p><p><b>　　5。積壓未測</b></p><p>　　6。工單包不完整（SWMS，JSA，圖紙，BOM等）</p><p>　　識(shí)別個(gè)別關(guān)鍵項(xiàng)目的維護(hù)和故障模式的故障率進(jìn)行了可靠性分析和全面的失效模式影響及危害性（FMECA）。這個(gè)過程的結(jié)果，得出的結(jié)論與慢性再現(xiàn)相同的維護(hù)的項(xiàng)目失敗所造成的同樣的故障模式和失效機(jī)制，其功能造成

50、的損失。帕累托分析，以確定問題的列表，使用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)最高的總收入損失，故障頻率，平均故障間隔時(shí)間（MTBF）和平均修復(fù)時(shí)間（MTTR）[4]。 Pareto分析識(shí)別尾隨電纜故障導(dǎo)致業(yè)務(wù)中斷作為一個(gè)領(lǐng)先的分擔(dān)。這種故障的原因包括：大多數(shù)電氣保護(hù)裝置故障和電氣故障的時(shí)間和輕微的復(fù)發(fā)??原因發(fā)生的物理傷害。根源物理損壞拖纜使用阿波羅根本原因分析進(jìn)一步確定。阿波羅根本原因分析是一個(gè)解決問題的技術(shù)，經(jīng)營原則，“事情不只是發(fā)生，他們的情況發(fā)生?！钡脑蚝?/p>

51、影響</p><p>　　關(guān)系治理所發(fā)生的一切，如有效的解決問題[5]的路徑。這個(gè)因果關(guān)系的確定突出顯示的在FMECA進(jìn)程中的故障模式。此外，額外的業(yè)務(wù)中斷也帶動(dòng)其他原因因素與數(shù)量最多的停機(jī)時(shí)間如下：</p><p><b>　　1.電動(dòng)系統(tǒng)失敗</b></p><p>　　2，控制和監(jiān)測系統(tǒng)故障</p><p><

52、;b>　　3，機(jī)械牽引故障</b></p><p>　　四?，F(xiàn)場數(shù)據(jù)采集反饋</p><p>　　從現(xiàn)場和在線監(jiān)測系統(tǒng)的數(shù)據(jù)收集必須是準(zhǔn)確的和現(xiàn)實(shí)的。它提供了一個(gè)生成正式的故障報(bào)告文件的起點(diǎn)和，確保反饋是穩(wěn)定和足夠的[6]。脈沖是一個(gè)電腦化維修管理系統(tǒng)（CMMS）目前在煤礦井下使用的。它是一個(gè)中央數(shù)據(jù)庫所有相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)有關(guān)植物寄存器和存。該系統(tǒng)能夠提供以下信息：</p&

53、gt;<p>　　1。工作訂單類型和優(yōu)先級(jí)</p><p>　　2.Selecting維護(hù)類型</p><p>　　3.Raising征用工作秩序</p><p>　　4。設(shè)備信息和材料清單（BOM）</p><p><b>　　5，設(shè)備歷史</b></p><p>　　6，供應(yīng)商信

54、息和成本報(bào)告</p><p>　　7.Estimates（時(shí)間和勞動(dòng)資料）</p><p>　　8.固定資產(chǎn)時(shí)間捕捉資產(chǎn)的運(yùn)行時(shí)間在24-hours/day</p><p>　　該系統(tǒng)還提供了其他關(guān)鍵信息的鏈接，有效地開展所需的工作，如：</p><p>　　1.Job計(jì)劃/標(biāo)準(zhǔn)工程</p><p>　　2.Safe工

55、作程序</p><p><b>　　3.工作許可證</b></p><p><b>　　4.Risk評估</b></p><p>　　5.Drawings和其他技術(shù)參考</p><p>　　軟件組織的設(shè)備層次，從植物寄存器級(jí)別和延伸：</p><p>　　1.兩個(gè)級(jí)別向下，子

56、裝配和組件;</p><p>　　2.兩個(gè)水平向上，植物類群和網(wǎng)站代碼。</p><p>　　工廠層級(jí)之外的，脈沖使用用戶定義的關(guān)鍵領(lǐng)域，“位置”，這是為了表明設(shè)備的物理位置站點(diǎn)的邊界內(nèi)。</p><p><b>　　五.結(jié)論</b></p><p>　　長壁煤炭開采生產(chǎn)系統(tǒng)的全球趨勢是朝著不斷提高生產(chǎn)力，用最少的操作和

57、維護(hù)成本成為可能。可以看出這種趨勢優(yōu)于從現(xiàn)有的長壁安裝和下一代的長壁安裝在增產(chǎn)預(yù)期不通。隨后，采煤機(jī)的需求，以增加工作面的生產(chǎn)是伴隨著增加服務(wù)和自動(dòng)化程度高的水平，以確保安全和高效的工作環(huán)境，為運(yùn)營商一致的采煤工作面的設(shè)備管理制度結(jié)合。然而，盈利能力取決于擁有的手段，準(zhǔn)確地診斷任何性能問題，才導(dǎo)致生產(chǎn)停機(jī)時(shí)間。因此，至關(guān)重要的是有滿意和可靠的工作人員使用正確的故障檢測工具的正確組合，優(yōu)化維護(hù)任務(wù)為導(dǎo)向，成為知識(shí)淵博，積極參與FMECA和

58、根源分析提供的商業(yè)價(jià)值。研究證明，這是正確的方式來提高采煤機(jī)的可靠性。定性，維護(hù)資源的利用率變得有效的控制和安全管理的采煤機(jī)的故障模式。是技術(shù)和控制機(jī)制，如項(xiàng)目的應(yīng)用，使過程達(dá)到最大的潛力。此外，這項(xiàng)研究表明，電腦收購一個(gè)準(zhǔn)確可靠的數(shù)據(jù)和應(yīng)用程序的可靠性工具，如FMECA，威布爾分析和解決問題的技術(shù)是必不可少的理解和管理失敗的行為和性能的采煤機(jī)在其工作壽命。卓越不是一個(gè)靜態(tài)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。酒吧總是被提出，所以持續(xù)的峰值性能的采煤機(jī)需要?dú)v史數(shù)據(jù)的