中德民事訴訟訴前證據(jù)保全制度比較研究.pdf

1、專業(yè)學位碩士研究生學位論文新疆大學論文題目論文題目(中文中文)：中德民事訴訟訴前證據(jù)保全制度比較研究中德民事訴訟訴前證據(jù)保全制度比較研究論文題目論文題目(外文外文)：ComparativestudyonthepretrialevidencepreservationsystemofSinoGermancivilsuit研究生姓名：研究生姓名：孫瑞孫瑞學位類別：別：專業(yè)學位專業(yè)學位專業(yè)名稱：稱：法律碩士法律碩士導師姓名職稱：導師姓名職稱：秦

2、鵬教授秦鵬教授論文答辯日期2016年5月21日學位授予日期2016年7月1日IIABSTRACTWhentheintegrationoftheChineseAngloAmericanlawsystemswasmarchingfwardGermanyhadbeenrevisingdevelopingitstraditionalcivilpretrialevidencepreservationsystem.Afteraperiodofacc

3、umulationanindependentevidenceinvestigationprocedurewhichwasuniquestatusindependentmultifunctionalwascarriedout.ThisprocedurenotonlyexpedfunctionsoftheGermanytraditionalevidencepreservationbutalsoadaptedwelltoneedsofthem

4、oderncivildisputes.MeanwhileChinapushedanewsetofpretrialevidencepreservationintheCivilProcedureLawin2012.Thisstepexpedtheevidencecollectionrightsofpartiestoacertainextentbutassociatedsystemdesignsupptingproceduresarestil

5、lfarfromperfect.ThispaperwillcomparethecivilpretrialevidencepreservationsysteminChinawiththatinGermantoanalyzethedeficiencyexistinginourcivilpretrialevidencepreservationsystemputfwardproposalsofimprovement.Itismyferventh

6、opethatthisarticlecouldbeareferenceftheachievementjudicialfairnessjustice.Thispaperwillbedividedinthreepartshereisabriefintroduction:ThefirstpartmainlyintroducestheChineseGermanypretrialevidencepreservationsystemofCivilP

7、rocedureLawfromthreeaspects:backgroundpurposelegislationstatus.Thesecondpartillustratesthesimilarities(mainlyexistinginthebreadthpropertypurpose)differences(mainlyexistinginfunctionapplicableregionimplementedeffectproced

8、ure)betweenChineseGermanythecivilpretrialevidencepreservationsystemthenconcludesourproblems.Basedontheproblemsthethirdpartputsfwardseveralsuggestionsfourcivilpretrialevidencepreservationsystem.KEYWDS:ChinaGermanypretrial