包庇犯罪立法比較研究.pdf

1、湖南大學碩士學位論文包庇犯罪立法比較研究姓名：肖彥彬申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：刑法學指導教師：王燕飛20090420碩士學位論文=mi1—宣皇———昌暑鼉毫—■—暑魯—●—皇皇■—|皇置——富皇——暑魯皇lAbstractIntheourcountry，crimeofshieldisnotkindoflegalcrime，butkindofabstractgeneralizationtothosecrimesofshield，thatis

2、kindofcrimeintheoryItconsistsoftypicalcrimesofshieldandatypicalcrimesofshieldNowadays，manycountriesandregionsmakethecrimeofshieldakindofobstructingjusticeinsteadofseparatecrimeBecauseofthevariouscrimesincludedincrimeofsh

3、ield，countriesandregionshavedifferentSOrtsastocrimeofshieldandthestiffandlooseofcriminal1awisinvolvedInprinciple，legislationofcriminallawshouldberefinedandtoavoidduplicationSoanappropriatestiffandlooseofcriminallawisrequ

4、iredCrimeofshieldisthemosttypicalcrimeThroughthecomparisonbetweenitssubjectandobject，sortsofcrimeindifferentcountriesandregionscanbeanalyzedBecauseofthedifferentcrimesofshield，differentpenaltiesshouldbemadeinaccordancewi

5、thvariouscriminaloffencesPunishmentincrimeofshieldismainlythepunishmentagainstfreedomwhichisconsideredtobevenialAstogradationofpenalties，countriesandregionshavemadeindependentconfigurationmodelandadherentconfigurationmod

6、elInordertealizetheprincipleoftheresponsibilityinaccordwithcrime，countriesandregionshavecarriedoutsomeregulatoryandcomplimentaryprovisionswhicharebasedontheprincipleconfigurationofcrimeThoseprovisionsareaboutlawfulheavie

7、rpunishments，aggravationpenaltiesorpenaltieswithlight，reductiveandremitpunishmentInChina，prescriptionsofcrimeinlawhavebeenmadeinchaptersofcrimesofobstructingjusticeProblemscanbefoundfromtwopointsFirstlyseriouspunishmenth

8、asbeenmadetocrimesofshieldwithawildobjectandnonappropriateconfigurationAndcontradictionandintercrossingamongcrimeshavebeenincreasinglyobviousSecondlypenaltiesincrimeofshieldarenotinaccordancewiththeladderofchargesandpuni

9、shmentThirdly，nolight，reductiveandremitpenaltieshavebeenmadetothoserelativeswhohavecommittedcrimesofshield，whichareagainsttheprincipleofrelativetejecttestilying，andlackofexpectationThisthesisisdevotedtoanalyzetheintegral