gm 1927-16-pcpa-通用過程控制計劃審核表格

1、GPSC Supplier Quality Process Control Plan Audit Summary Sheet Date: GM 1927-16Version January 2011Supplier Name: Supplier Phone: Mfg. DUNS: Plant Location including repair/rework areas?WIP InstructionsFinal Shipping I

2、nstructionsCheck to make sure all operators and material handling personnel are aware of and following WIP instructions. NR G47Are all parts and components labeled properly and is shipping label error proofing to prevent

3、 part misidentification?Shipping LabelPart PrintProcess Control PlanInspection SheetsDoes the Shipping Label match the Part Print? Verify Control Plan and In-Process Inspection sheets. NR GD. Quality System Implementati

4、on by ManagementAUDIT WORKSHEET QUESTION: In regard to Quality System Implementation by ManagementEVIDENCE /DOCUMENTATIONREQUIREDQUESTIONS TO ASK AND WHAT TO LOOK FOR ScoreG Y ROBSERVATIONS48Is there a process for docu

5、menting and tracking Downtime, Scrap, First time Quality, Premium Freight, Plant Problem Reports?Plant Informational BoardCurrent Charting ofInformationAre records for Downtime, Scrap, First time Quality, Premium Freight

6、, Plant Problem Reports used to manage the business? Look for existing charts, data logs, action plans, or similar that validate the existence of a tracking mechanism.NR G49 Does leadership ensure that Out of Control Con

7、ditions & nonconformities are managed?SPC Records Action PlansRegularly review SPC data, check to see that there is a system to manage out of control conditions that includes action plans with assigned responsibility

8、. Ask someone noted on the action plan to explain their involvement and or responsibility.NR G50 Are Action Plans (AP) for all nonconformities followed?SPC Records Action PlansDocument effectively and timely, check to se

9、e that there is a system to manage out of control conditions that includes action plans with assigned responsibility. Ask someone noted on the action plan to explain their involvement and or responsibility.NR G51 Is resp

10、onsibility for implementation assigned and do people understand their responsibility?SPC Records Action PlansFrom SPC review, check to see that there is a system to manage out of control conditions that includes action p

11、lans with assigned responsibility. Ask someone noted on the action plan to explain their involvement and or responsibility.NR G52 Are problems quickly communicated to people who can help? Problem LogDoes an escalation pr

12、ocess exist to quickly communicate to the appropriate level within the organization and ensure that support and action plans are followed.NR G53 Does the support system respond to the operator? Problem LogLook for a dail

13、y problem log or similar. Look at entry and action dates for some evidence of that those responsible for resolution are quickly engaged. Look for evidence that operators are part of the problem resolution process. Ask op

14、erators if they are aware of problems and how they are resolved.NR G54 If more than one shift, does information part passes across shifts? Shift LogLook for shift log/notes. Audit records to assure that reported problems

15、 and their resolutions are also reported back to the originator. Look for evidence of a closed loop on shift problems.NR G55Are all checks to be done under the PCP requirements performed? Are results properly documented?

16、 Are suitable actions taken in case of deviations?PFMEAProcess Control PlanIs there evidence that all concerns are tracked back to the PFMEA to confirm that the failure mode has been included? Look for PFMEA change log c

17、ross referenced to PRR log, customer complaint log, voice of the process review, warranty data, etc. Is there evidence that controls have been added, or controls/RPNs revised based on concerns.NR G56Are major process par

18、ameters identified with reasonable evidence [example:DOE (Design of Experiment) or Full Factoral method etc. ] and controlled with the PCP?DOE or otherexperimental dateProcess Control PlanDetermine which process paramete

19、rs satisfy the product specifications with reasonable evidence. These parameters should be included in the PFMEA and PCP. This evidence is recommended as a DOE (Design of Experiment) or Full Factoral method and should

20、be validated with enough sample size. The defined critical process parameters should be controlled and password protected in the PLC (Programmable Logic Controller). Supervisor’s approval would be required to change the

21、 parameters.NR G57 Are plans in place to implement all elements of Quality System Basics (QSB)?Perform and complete QSB Audit and actionplansIs there evidence of a QSB Audit? Has the supplier had a QSB Workshop? What is

22、the plan to implement QSB principals and elements? Is there a Master Dot Action plan for all red and yellow QSB elements and PCPA elements?NR G58 Does the work environment demonstrate compliance to the Global Sullivan Pr

23、inciples?Review manufacturingwork environmentVerify there are no hazardous work conditions, no health & safety issues, workers appear to be of legal age, and no forced or abusive labor practices. Refer to Global Sull

24、ivan Principles for more information.NR GApproved Approved, but need Documentation RejectedIn case of deviations use GM 1927-79 Supplier Action Plan FormSupplier Representative Name with Signature Follow-Up Audit Date GM