2023年全國碩士研究生考試考研英語一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁
已閱讀1頁,還剩5頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、An architect's perspective on contemporary academic library designBy Steven M. Foote, AIA PresidentPerry Dean Rogers however, architects and librarians do possess several shared perceptions. Among these shared perce

2、ptions are that print collections will remain a primary function of libraries for the foreseeable future, flexibility in shelving arrangements are essential, adjacencies must be fluid, floor-to-floor heights should be ge

3、nerous, compact shelving has become commonplace, print and electronic media must coexist, and technology has not reduced library space requirements. Experience reinforces the continuing and increasing significance of the

4、 library on college and university campuses.Symbols and iconography in the late twentieth cen- tury pose tremendous challenges for architects. Many of our building types, libraries among them, are shackled by outdated im

5、agery at the same time that they remain the centers of intellectual purpose. Li- brary designers struggle in a search for the symbolic meaning of technology; it is a challenge in which the traditional values of western c

6、ulture are met by the indeterminacy of and questions about the formal meaning of technology and electronics. As we strive for greater discernment, understanding, and ad- vancement of the architectural meaning of library,

7、 our task has hardly begun; we must then be able to con- vince our clients of the wisdom of our thought pro- cess and to part with their cash to build the results. The making of space and place (architecture) re- quires

8、cultural and financial consent as to societal value. If we cannot agree on standards, how are we to judge quality in what we build? At times, even the most erudite and far-thinking clients cannot over- come their traditi

9、onal ideas of appropriate library de- sign; classical monumentality has been accepted for libraries for centuries. The competition for the main branch of the Chicago Public Library, in which some of the most prominent me

10、mbers of our profession participated, was a case in point. In the end, that jury rather poignantly selected the winner mainly on the grounds that “It looked like a library.“ The standards and values of the nineteenth cen

11、tury still applied, because no more modern imagery has convincingly captured our cultural endorsement. We are not alone here, by the way.Writing in the New York Times on February 12, 1995, Herbert Muschamp observed that

12、Mario Botta, the architect of the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, had missed a chance to “say something about the changing nature of modernity,“ or to display “the power of architecture to reckon with the discordance

13、 that lurks beneath our masks of composure“ [1]. The same issues confront the jury of librarians and ar- chitects as they attempt to recognize the best designs in the biannual American Library Association/Ar- chitectural

14、 Institute of America awards program. Our professions, mutually dependent, still battle with fer- vor and passion as we search to redefine quality in our work. That search will not lead red herring-ly to an im- agery in

15、which time-honored principles of propor- tion, massing, detail, light, and design in context are subordinated to literal interpretations of electronic high fashion, any more than principles of aerody- namics and fuel eff

16、iciency in automobiles have been abandoned because of the installation of cellular phones. Architecture, fortunately, remains with us. Technology and electronics are merely tools for our use. Of far greater interest is h

17、ow they have changed the ways we use our libraries. In that context, I offer several perceptions about the academic library of the immediate future about which librarians and archi- tects generally agree. Among them are

18、these.Collections in print will continue to dominate our libraries. The housing of print collections and readers remains the primary function of libraries today andBull Med Libr Assoc 83(3) July 1995 351An architect'

19、s perspectiveFigure 2 Olin Memorial Library, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut1. ORIGINAL MAIN LOBBY, NOW RESTORED2. STACKS 4. ATTIC READING ROOM3. NEW INDEX AND REFERENCE ROOM BU IL DI NG SECT ION 5. NEW READ

20、ING GALLERYwhere the staff may wish to put it. Office space, nor- mally designed at fifty pounds' live loading, is far too likely to be reconfigured in the early life of the new building. We have observed that the pr

21、emium from 150 pounds' to 300 pounds' loading, which will per- mit compact shelving anywhere, is only 10% of the structural cost of the project. This translates to rough- ly 2% of the overall cost of construction

22、.Adjacencies must be fluid. Increasingly, we find readers, collections, and staff blended together on every floor. Richard DeGennaro's definition of a li- brarian, that of “everybody's assistant,“ seems more apt

23、with every passing day [2]. We now include a number of oversized work stations, fifty-four inches in width on every floor, accommodating both a stu- dent and a professional offering momentary assis- tance. In the new Hea

24、lth Sciences and Information Services Building at the University of Maryland at Baltimore, positions for both librarians and computer systems staff will be on each of its six floors. On the entry levels of both public an

25、d academic libraries, service points can be found located in ar- chitectural arrangements that bear uncanny resem- blances to cafeteria servery plans. Reference desks (rotisserie chicken), interlibrary loan (hot drinks),

26、media services (salad bars), and OPAC terminals (con- diments) can all be found on the way to circulation desks (cashiers). Persons using self-checkout kiosks (automatic-teller machines) can bypass any require- ment for

27、human interaction. Traffic and noise levels are high and are likely to remain so. Traditional func- tions blur, and even staff job descriptions can change during the course of the design process. New staffing efficiencie

28、s are developed in response to increasing responsibilities rarely matched by increases in num- bers or funding.Floor-to-floor heights should be generous. McKim et al. determined in the nineteenth century that seven feet

29、was the maximum shelf height for most persons' comfortable reach and from that developed an ele- gant system of floor relationships [3]. Using seven feet, six inches as the floor-to-floor heights for self- supporting

30、 closed stacks, the architects arranged cor- ridors and minor galleries of fifteen feet at every other stack level. Major reading rooms of thirty feet were then placed adjacent to four stack levels or two gallery levels.

31、 Today's mechanical systems and build- ing codes restrictions no longer permit the volumetric density of such a system (Figure 2). Floor-to-floor heights of fourteen to fifteen feet areBull Med Libr Assoc 83(3) July

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論