版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、 Procedia Economics and Finance 23 ( 2015 ) 1492 – 1498 2212-5671 © 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/
2、4.0/). Selection and/ peer-review under responsibility of Academic World Research and Education Center doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00462-1 ScienceDirectAvailable online at www.sciencedirect.com2nd GLOBAL CONFERENCE on BU
3、SINESS, ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT and TOURISM, 30-31 October 2014, Prague, Czech Republic The opportunity cost of equity capital Jana Dzuri?kováa, Radka Fabinyováa, Bohuslava Mihal?ováa* aUniversity of Econom
4、ics in Bratislava, Faculty of Business Economics in Ko?ice, Tajovského 13, 041 30 Ko?ice, Slovakia Abstract This paper is focused on the calculation of cost of equity with using the CAPM model and Build-up model. Th
5、e main aim of this calculation was to discover whether traditional measurements of business performance are better than selected modern measurements or not. For the calculation we used a sample of 31 engineering compan
6、ies situated in the Slovak market. Based on the research results we propose a methodology that could be suitable for the more efficient calculation of costs for examined industry. © 2014 The Authors. Published by
7、 Elsevier B.V. Selection and/ peer-review under responsibility of Academic World Research and Education Center. Keywords: Build-up model, CAPM model, economic value added, cost of equity capital, engineering industry; 1
8、. Introduction The growing competition among companies at the market and the strong connectivity among individual economies can be considered as most significant effects of globalization. The negative consequences of th
9、ese effects are showed especially with arrival of the financial and economic crisis in 2008, which caused deeper financial or existential problems in some companies. According to these problems, there arise up an incre
10、asing pressure on examination of business performance. So, we can ask the question how we could evaluate companies and their performance as efficiently as possible under these conditions. There are several traditiona
11、l (e.g. indicators of liquidity, activity, profitability, etc.) or modern (e.g. EVA, MVA, NPV, CFROI, etc.) indicators of business performance, which bring a more dynamic and realistic image about company but not only
12、about its performance but also about competitive position on the market. Thanks to the simplicity of calculation, not only Slovak companies tend to use traditional indicators for measure of business * Bohuslava Mihal?ov
13、á. Tel.: +421-905-807-851 E-mail address: mihlacova.b@seznam.cz © 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
14、/). Selection and/ peer-review under responsibility of Academic World Research and Education Center1494 Jana Dzuri?ková et al. / Procedia Economics and Finance 23 ( 2015 ) 1492 – 1498 re – opportunity cost
15、of equity capital, E – Equity. The new added value is created when EVA > 0. So, it means that effectiveness of the invested capital is equal to the cost of its acquisition. On the other hand, if EVA 0. So, it means
16、 that effectiveness of the invested capital is equal to the cost of its acquisition. On the other hand, if EVA < 0 it means that investor is loss-making. The results are obvious but how could companies calculate the
17、 value of opportunity cost of equity capital? The opportunity cost of equity capital is one of the most important parameters that affect the final total value of company. There exist a several models how we could calcu
18、late it e.g. model INFA, Gordon Growth model, model APT, etc. In our research, we decided to use CAPM model and Build-up model, because these models are most used in conditions of European Union countries. But are thes
19、e two models usable in conditions of the Slovak market? 2.2. Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) This model was developed by W. Sharpe and J. Lintner around 1965 building on the earlier work of H. Markowitz which was foc
20、used on diversification and modern portfolio theory. The CAPM model is considered as a basic model for determination the relationship between market risk and return of financial investments (Vlachynský et. al., 20
21、06). According to some studies, this model has general application on the market. It means that the market portfolio should include all financial investments. But there could be a problem with its using in practice beca
22、use there exist companies which don´t have financial investments on the stock market. In this paper, we are focused on the calculation of opportunity cost of equity capital. Because of that, we used for calculati
23、on following mathematical formula: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ?? (2) Where: rf – risk-
24、free rate of interest, rm – rf – market risk premium, ? – Market risk or sensitivity of the expected excess asset returns to the expected excess market returns. In our research, we used two different methods of calcula
25、tion of market risk (beta coefficient) – the analogy method and analysis of operating factors. When we were setting the risk-free rate of interest, we faced with a problem, which type of bonds should be use in term of
26、maturity and also in term of their issuer. Based on the available literature, we discovered that the best type of bonds is government bonds. There is a assumption of the government bonds, that government is able to pay
27、 its debt at least in nominal value. Because of that, the best choice could be American 30-years bonds. However, there arose the question whether it makes sense to use this type of bonds in calculation for other non-Am
28、erican countries. 2.3. Build-up model The second model, which we use in our calculation of the opportunity cost of equity capital, is the Build-up model. This model is known as WACC model which was developed by Inka an
29、d Ivan Neumaier. It was originally based on the assumption of independence WACC of capital structure and financing of company only with using equity capital (Neumaier, Neumaier, 2002). The Build-up model is considered
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語翻譯]機會成本外文翻譯--股權(quán)資本的機會成本
- [雙語翻譯]機會成本外文翻譯--股權(quán)資本的機會成本中英全
- 2015年機會成本外文翻譯--股權(quán)資本的機會成本
- 2015年機會成本外文翻譯--股權(quán)資本的機會成本(英文).PDF
- 2015年機會成本外文翻譯--股權(quán)資本的機會成本.DOCX
- 機會成本(opportunitycost)
- “二孩”的機會成本分析
- 風(fēng)險投資資本的機會成本分析.pdf
- 會計成本與機會成本的明確認(rèn)識
- 淺談機會成本與會計學(xué)成本比較
- 考慮機會成本時的采購招標(biāo)模型
- 放棄現(xiàn)金折扣的機會成本的計算
- 行為成本與代理成本和機會成本的比較
- 基于邊際機會成本的石油定價模型研究
- 中國工業(yè)環(huán)境管制的機會成本研究.pdf
- 2機會成本和比較優(yōu)勢的應(yīng)用
- 我國持有外匯儲備機會成本研究.pdf
- [教育]在機會成本遞增的情況下
- 機會成本vs.現(xiàn)金流量法
- 語言教法選擇與機會成本核算
評論
0/150
提交評論