簡介：蠶能天誓碩士專業(yè)學(xué)位論文2008屆完善我國著作權(quán)刑事保護(hù)芻議ONTHEPERFECTIONOFTHECHINESECRIMINALPROTECTIONOFCOPYRIGHT研究生姓名叁墨指導(dǎo)教師姓名主塵笪苧蕉專業(yè)學(xué)位名稱壁焦墮研究方向塑墊￡塾量論文提交日期2Q生L旦ONTHEPERFECTIONOFTHECHINESECRIMINALPROTECTIONOFCOPYRIGHTABSTRACT0NTHEPERFECTIONOFTHECHINESECRIMINALPROTECTIONOFCOPYRIGHTABSTRACTWITHTHERAPIDDEVELOPMENTOFECONOMYANDTHEIMPLEMENTOFTHESTRATEGYOFREVITALIZINGCHINATHROUGHINNOVATION，OURCOUNTRYPAYSMOREANDMOREATTENTIONTOJUDICIALPROTECTIONFORINTELLECTUALPROPERTYRIGHTS，ESPECIALLYTHECRIMINALPROTECTIONFORCOPYRIGHTITSSTEPSHAVEBEENQUICKENED，THETHRESHOLDFORCONVICTIONHASBEENLOWERED，ANDCONSIDERABLEPROGRESSANDDEVELOPMENTHAVEBEENMADEINLEGISLATIONANDJUDICATUREHOWEVERCURRENTLYTHECRIMINALPHENOMENONOFLITERARYPIRACYINOURCOUNTRYISSTILLSERIOUS，WHICHHASBECOMETHEOBJECTTHATTHEWESTERNCOUNTRIESFINDFAULTWITHTOGETHERPRACTICESHOWSTHATTHECRIMINALPROTECTIONFORCOPYRIGHTWHICHSTILLHASALOTOFPROBLEMSANDDEFICIENCIESINLEGISLATIVEANDJUDICIALPRACTICENEEDSCONTINUOUSIMPROVEMENTANDPERFECTIONTHISARTICLE，F(xiàn)ROMTHEANGLEOFCRIMINALPROTECTION，MAKESACOMPREHENSIVEANALYSISTOTHECRIMINALPROTECTIONMEASURESANDCURRENTJUDICIALSITUATIONOFCOPYRIGHTINOURCOUNTRYPOINTSOUTTHEEXISTINGDEFECTSOFTHERELEVANTPROVISIONSABOUTCOPYRIGHTCRIMESINCOPYRIGHTLAWANDCRIMINALLAWLEARNTHEEXPERIENCEOFTHECONCERNEDCOUNTRIESANDREGIONS，ANDPUTSFORWARDLEGISLATIVEANDJUDICIALPROPOSALSTOPERFECTTHECRIMINALPROTECTIONFORCOPYRIGHTKEYWORDSCOPYRIGHTCRIMINALPROTECTIONLEGISLATIONAPPLICATIONOFPUNISHMENTIIWRITTENBYZHUYISUPERVISEDBYLIXIAOWEI

簡介：分類號(hào)學(xué)校代碼Q5壘2密級(jí)學(xué)號(hào)20080L020096著作權(quán)質(zhì)押法律效力研究。THESTUDYONLEGAIEFFECTOFTHECOPYRIGHTPIEDGE指導(dǎo)教師姓名、職稱蘊(yùn)塹董絲撞湖南師范大學(xué)學(xué)位評(píng)定委員會(huì)辦公室二0一一年九月PLLRI’IL。IL事’F睜?！骸篖▲■P峙RIT飛I摘要LJILLLLRIIIIIIIRLLIIRII卜Y2047088I2著作權(quán)質(zhì)押作為一種新興的擔(dān)保物權(quán)，是指債務(wù)人或者第三人將著作權(quán)中的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)作為債權(quán)的擔(dān)保，當(dāng)債務(wù)人不履行債務(wù)時(shí)，債權(quán)人有權(quán)依法以該特定權(quán)利折價(jià)或者拍賣，變賣的價(jià)款優(yōu)先受償。隨著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)資本市場的發(fā)展繁榮，著作權(quán)質(zhì)押這種權(quán)利擔(dān)保方式日益受到各國投資者的青睞。但由于我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度起步較晚，相關(guān)法律對(duì)著作權(quán)質(zhì)押法律效力的規(guī)范仍顯粗糙。因此，對(duì)著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的法律效力研究具有重要的理論和實(shí)踐意義。著作權(quán)質(zhì)押法律效力主要涉及到四個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容一、著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的設(shè)定，這是著作權(quán)質(zhì)押產(chǎn)生法律效力的基礎(chǔ)。具體而言，著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的設(shè)定包括三個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容，即著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的法律特征、著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的生效要件以及探討著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的特殊類型。二、著作權(quán)質(zhì)押對(duì)物的效力。其具體內(nèi)容包括了三個(gè)方面，即著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的權(quán)利范圍、著作權(quán)質(zhì)押所擔(dān)保的債權(quán)范圍、著作權(quán)質(zhì)押效力所及的標(biāo)的范圍。三、著作權(quán)質(zhì)押對(duì)人的效力。這部分主要分為在著作權(quán)質(zhì)押中對(duì)質(zhì)權(quán)人和出質(zhì)人的權(quán)利義務(wù)內(nèi)容，以及著作權(quán)質(zhì)押對(duì)第三人的效力問題。四、完善我國著作權(quán)質(zhì)押法律效力的建議。通過對(duì)我國著作權(quán)質(zhì)押法律效力制度的立法考察和實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀的分析，提出在著作權(quán)質(zhì)押中確立“登記對(duì)抗主義“的設(shè)立原則，完善著作權(quán)質(zhì)押中質(zhì)權(quán)人的處分權(quán)制度，健全著作權(quán)質(zhì)押中質(zhì)權(quán)人的保全機(jī)制，從而重新構(gòu)建我國著作權(quán)質(zhì)押法律效力制度，促進(jìn)著作權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的發(fā)展。關(guān)鍵詞著作權(quán)，質(zhì)權(quán)，著作權(quán)質(zhì)押，法律效力CL■■■■R【’

簡介：碩士學(xué)位論文碩士學(xué)位論文計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)技術(shù)保護(hù)措施案例研究計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)技術(shù)保護(hù)措施案例研究CASESTUDIESOFTECHNOLOGICALPROTECTIONMEASURESFCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT院系法學(xué)院系法學(xué)院專業(yè)法律碩士業(yè)法律碩士（知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)方向）方向）姓名名劉桂岑劉桂岑指導(dǎo)教師壽指導(dǎo)教師壽步教授步教授，徐彥冰，徐彥冰講師講師完成日期完成日期2011年4月25日

簡介：華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文我國著作權(quán)集體管理組織運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究姓名張德群申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)法律指導(dǎo)教師羅玉中20090516華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文IIABSTRACTASTUDYONTHEMOVINGMECHANISMOFCOPYRIGHTCOLLECTIVEADMINISTRATIONORGANISMINOURCOUNTRYCOPYRIGHTCOLLECTIVEADMINISTRATIONORGANISMCAMEFROMWESTERNCOUNTRIESITHASBEENINTHESECOUNTRIESFORABOUT200YEARS,BUTITHASBEENINCHINAFORLESSTHAN20YEARSINCHINA,THEFIRSTCOPYRIGHTCOLLECTIVEADMINISTRATIONORGANISMCALLEDTHEMUSICCOPYRIGHTSOCIETYOFCHINA,WHICHWASESTABLISHEDIN1992ITISBECOMINGMOREPERFECTTHANBEFOREALTHOUGHITISLATEFORCOPYRIGHTCOLLECTIVEADMINISTRATIONORGANISMSTOCOMETOCHINA,ITISONLY20YEARSSINCETHEORGANISMSCAMETOCHINATHEORGANISMSAREDEVELOPINGMOREQUICKLYINCHINAIN1990,THECOPYRIGHTLAWWITHNOANYCONTENTINIT,BUTIN1991,COPYRIGHTCOLLECTIVEMANAGEMENTREGULATIONSINTRODUCEDTHEORGANISMTOPROTECTTHECOPYRIGHTOFTHEMEMBERSFIRST,THENIN1992,CHINAESTABLISHEDHISFIRSTORGANISMIN2001,THECOPYRIGHTLAWWASREWRITTENWITHTHECHANGEOFTHESITUATIONINOURCOUNTRY,NOWITMAKESSOMERULESFORTHEORGANISMSFORMALLYTHENONMAR1,2005,COPYRIGHTCOLLECTIVEMANAGEMENTREGULATIONSWITHSOMEMOREDETAILEDCONTENTSINITTHEREGULATIONSCANDOMANYTHINGSFORTHEORGANISMSINCHINASINCEITWEREINTRODUCEDTOUSEBYUSBOTHTHECOPYRIGHTHOLDERSANDTHEUSERSCANBENEFITFROMTHEMOVINGMECHANISMSOFTHEORGANISMSWITHTHEAPPEARANCEOFTHEIMPORTANCEOFTHECOPYRIGHTCOLLECTIVEMANAGEMENTTHEPERFECTMECHANISMOFTHECOLLECTIVEADMINISTRATIONORGANISMSCAUSESMOREATTENTIONBYPEOPLETHEORGANISMSHAVEMORETHANONECHARACTERINCHINATHETHESISLOOKSONTHECOPYRIGHTCOLLECTIVEMANAGEMENTATANANGLEOFMOVINGMECHANISM,EMPHASIZESPARTICULARLYONDISCUSSINGTHEMECHANISMOFTHEORGANISMSAREINMOTION,THENDISCUSSESHOWTOPERFECTTHEIRLIMITATIONSONTHEBASISOFRECEIVEDMATERIALSINTHELIBRARY,THETHESISADOPTEDSOMEMETHODSTOANALYZETHEORGANISMSHOWTOCOMEINTOBEING,HOWTODIFINETHEIRCHARACTER,INTERIORANDEXTERIORMOVINGMECHANISMINCLUDINGTHEIRLIMITATIONSINOURCOUNTRYATPRESENT,HASSOMEDEEPLYTHINKSABOUTTHEMECHANISMATLAST,THETHESISGIVESAFEWSUGGESTIONS

簡介：湖南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文中國網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下著作權(quán)合理使用制度研究姓名陸寧申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)民商法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師唐超華20090515碩士學(xué)位論文ABSTRACTASANIMPORTANTSYSTEMOFTHEWHOLECOPYRIGHTMECHANISM，F(xiàn)AIRUSEISFACINGAHUGEIMPACTTHEDEVELOPMENTOFINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGYCHANGESTHEOBJECTOFFAIRUSEDIGITALWORKSBECOMETHEMAINFORMTHISCHANGESDIRECTLYMADETHEACTSOFCOPYINGQUCIKANDLOWCOST，MODESOFTRANSMISSIONDIVERSIFIEDANDRESPONSIBILITIESOFCOMMUNICATORSCOMPLICATEDINTHENETWORKENVIRONMENT，TECHNOLOGICALMEASUREPLAYSANIMPORTANTROLEINTHEFAIRUSE，BUTALSOLEDSTOASERIESOFDISPUTESTHECRITERIAOFFAIRUSEGETINTOTROUBLEINTHENETWORKTHESEISSUESINTHEORYLEADTOASTRONGCONTROVERSYINJUDICIALPRACTICEHAVEALSOHADATROUBLEDRESERCHINGTHESEISSUESHELPIMPROVINGANGENRICHINGTHEFAIRUSETHEROYANDSOLVINGTHECOPYRIGHTDISPUTESINTHEPRACTICEDESPITETHEFAIRUSEINTHENETWORKENVIRONMENTISBEINGQUESTIONED，ITSTILLHASTHEREASONTOBEINEXISTENCE，WHICHREFLECTEDINTHEFUNCTIONVALUE、THELAWTHEORYBASIC、THEECONOMICBASICANDCULTURALBASIC。INORDERTOCOPEWITHCHANGESINTECHNOLOGY，THEFAIRUSEMUSTBEADJUSTEDATTHERIGHTTIMEFIRSTOFALL，THECONCEPT、THEJUDGECRITERIAANDTHESPECIFICFORMSOFTHEFAIRUSEMUSTBEREDEFINEINTHENETWORKENVIRONMENTSECONDLY，WHILECONFORMTHELEGISLATIONCONCEPTABOUTFAIRUSEWITHTIMES，WESHOULDGIVEFULLCONSIDERATIONTOTHEINTERESTSOFTHECOPYRIGHTHOLDER，THERELATIONSHIPBETWEENLAWANDSCIENCEANDTECHNOLOGY，ASWELLASTHECOSTOFTHEIMPLEMENTATIONOFLAWSANDOTHERFACTORS；WESHOULDIMPROVETHELEGISLATIVEPROCESSABOUTFAIRUSE，ENSURETHATDIFFERENTPARTIESCANTAKEPARTINTHEPROCESSEXTENSIVELYANDEFFICIENTLYTHIRD，THETORTLIABILITYOFTHENETWORKSERVICEPROVIDERMUSTBEREEXAMINEANDTHEMEANINGOFTHERIGHTOFREPRODUCTIONSHOULDMAKECLEARFROMTHEPROVISIONSOFTHELAWOURCOUNTRY’SLEGISLATIONABOUTTECHNICALMEASURESISCOMPARATIVESCIENTIFIC，BUTSTILLINSUFFICIENTCOMPAREDTOTHEUNITEDSTATESANDOTHERDEVELOPEDCOUNTRIESWECANREFERTOTHEDMCATOMAKECOMPLEMENTARITYINTHENETWORKENVIRONMENT，DEVELOPINGTHESYSTEMOFCOLLEVTIVEMANAGEMENTOFCOPYRIGHTANDCOPYRIGHTAGENCYSYSTEMISOFGREATSIGNIFICANCETOTHEACTUALOPERATIONOFTHEFAIRUSESYSTEMKEYWORDSFAIRUSE；NETWORKSERVICEPROVIDER；REPRODUCERIGHT；TECHNOLOGICALMEASUREIII

簡介：南昌大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論數(shù)字信息時(shí)代著作權(quán)的合理使用制度姓名熊璐申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)民商法指導(dǎo)教師李光曼20081220ABSTRACTABSTRACTSINCETHEBIRTHOF”ANNAQUEENACT”，F(xiàn)AIRUSEOFCOPYRIGHTHASBEENANIMPORTANTCOMPONENTINTHETHEORYOFTHECOPYRIGHTISSUETHISSYSTEMTYPICALLYREFLECTSTHECOPYRIGHTLAWTOPROTECTTHECOPYRIGHTOFAUTHORSANDOTHERINTERESTSANDTHEPROMOTIONOFTHEDUALOBJECTIVEOFTHEWIDEDISSEMINATIONOFINFORMATIONBUTWITHTHECONTINUOUSDEVELOPMENTOFSCIENCEANDTECHNOLOGY，ADIGITALINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGYHASBEENUSEDMOREANDMOREFREQUENTLYINOURLIVES，THESETECHNOLOGIESBROUGHTCONVENIENCETOOURDAILYLIVES，BUTITALSOBROUGHTUNPRECEDENTEDSHOCKSANDCHALLENGESTOTHETRADITIONALSYSTEMOFCOPYRIGHTFACETOTHESESHOCKSANDCHALLENGES，HOWFAIRUSEOFTHECOPYRIGHTSYSTEMWILLBERESPONDINTHISPAPER，THEPURPOSEOFWRITINGTHISISTHATTHOUGHTHESTUDYOFFAIRUSEOFTHECOPYRIGHTSYSTEMTOFINDTHEANSWERTHEARTICLEISDIVIDEDINTOTHEFOLLOWINGFOURPARTSFIRST，DOSOMERESEARCHONTHEHISTORY，NATURE，ANDOTHERBASICISSUESOFFAIRUSEFROMATHEORETICALPOINTOFVIEWTOSTUDYFAIRUSEOFCOPYRIGHT，UNDERSTANDITSCONNOTATIONSOFTHECONCEPT，THEDEVELOPMENTPROCESSOFTHESYSTEMANALYZETHREEKINDSOFTHETHEORYOFFAIRUSEWHICHAREEXISTINGINTHEORETICALCIRCLETHESECONDPARTOFTHEPAPERWILLRESEARCHONTHESTATUSOFFAIRUSEOFTHECOPYRIGHTSYSTEMUNDERTHEDIGITALINFORMATIONAGEDISCUSSFAIRUSESHOULDCONTINUETOBEANANALYSISORNOTINTHECURRENTERA1WILLUSE“DIGITALLIBRARY”ANDTHE”PERSONALUSE”INNETWORKENVIRONMENTASTHESETWOTYPICALEXAMPLESTOREVEALTHECONFLICTBETWEENFAIRUSEOFTHETRADITIONALSYSTEMOFCOPYRIGHTANDDIGITALINFORMATIONAGETHEN，BASEONTHESETOMAKEANANALYSISANDSUMMARYABOUTTHESHORTAGESOFFAIRUSEINOURCOPYRIGHTSYSTEMSTATUSTHETHIRDPARTINVOLVESTHEFAIRUSEOFTHEINTERNATIONALCOPYRIGHTSYSTEMCHANGESANDDEVELOPMENTSMAINLYFROMTWOANGLESTHETHEORETICALDEVELOPMENTANDLEGISLATIVEREFORMTAKETHEUNITEDSTATES，THEEUROPEANUNIONANDSOMEINTEMATIONALCORPORATIONSASEXAMPLESTOREVEALTHECURRENTINTERNATIONALATTITUDEANDAPPROACHONIMPROVINGFAIRUSESYSTEMOFCOPYRIGHTIII

簡介：南京理工大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題研究姓名陳嬡琳申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)民商法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師朱顯國20080601ABSTRACT碩士論文ABSTRACTPEERTOPEER‘P2P”TECHNOLOGY’SBIRTHANDDEVELOPMENTDRASTICALLYCHANGESTHEINTERACTINFORMATIONTRANSFERANDNETWORKRUNNINGMODE，ANDSTIMULATESTHEINFORMATIONTRANSFERSPEEDANDQUALITYASWELLINFORMATIONTRANSFERWITHP2PTECHNOLOGYTURNSTOBETHEMAINSTREAMFORTHEUSERSINSHARINGINFORMATIONHOWEVERASPEOPLEALWAYSSAID，TECHNOLOGYISADOUBLEEDGEDSWORDNETWORKUSERS’FREEOFRESTRICTIONDIGITALDUPLICATIONANDONLINEDISTRIBUTIONHAVETHREATENEDTHECOPYRIGHTHOLDER’SINTERESTANDENDANGERTHEPROPERPROTECTIONOFTHEDIGITALWORKSP2PTECHNOLOGYSTRIKESTHELASTINGBALANCEAMONGTHECOPYFIGHT，SCIENCEANDTECHNOLOGYDEVELOPMENTANDPUBLICINTEREST，ANDTRIGGERSTHESEVERECONFLICTSAMONGTHECOPYRIGHTHOLDER’TECHNOLOGYDEVELOPERANDPUBLICUSERSITELABORATESP2PSOFTWARE’SIMPACTONTHECOPYRIGHTHOLDERS’INTEREST，ANDPROBESINTOTHELEGALLIABILITYOFENDUSERANDPROVIDERUNDERTHEPRESENTLAWSTHROUGHTHEANALYSISOFNAPSTERCASE，GROKSTERCASE，THEBTCASEANDKUROCASEITPOINTSOUTLEVYISTHEOPTIMALSOLUTIONAFTERCOMPREHENSIVECOMPARISONINTHEEND、析THTHESTUDYTHEACTUALSITUATIONOFCHINAITRAISESLEGISLATIVEPROPOSALONTHEESTABLISHMENTOFLEVYKEYWORDP2PCOPYRIGHT，INFORMATIONNETWORKPROPAGATIONRIGHT，LEVYII

簡介：0038042網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代著作權(quán)默示許可制度立法研究LEGISLATIVERESEARCHONIMPLIEDLICENSESYSTEMOFCOPYRIGHTINNETWORKTIMES專業(yè)民商法學(xué)碩士研究生李慧指導(dǎo)教師李穎怡副教授勢產(chǎn)論文答辯委員會(huì)主席委員陣爭哆／醐唧年J胡嚴(yán)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學(xué)位論文，是本人在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下，獨(dú)立進(jìn)行研究工作所取得的成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本論文不包含任何其他個(gè)人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的作品成果。對(duì)本文的研究作出重要貢獻(xiàn)的個(gè)人和集體，均己在文中以明確方式標(biāo)明。本人完全意識(shí)到本聲明的法律結(jié)果由本人承擔(dān)。學(xué)位論文作，躲楗日期矽『7年J月計(jì)日學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)聲明本人完全了解中山大學(xué)有關(guān)保留、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，即學(xué)校有權(quán)保留學(xué)位論文并向國家主管部門或其指定機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的電子版和紙質(zhì)版，有權(quán)將學(xué)位論文用于非贏利目的的少量復(fù)制并允許論文進(jìn)入學(xué)校圖書館、院系資料室被查閱，有權(quán)將學(xué)位論文的內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進(jìn)行檢索，可以采用復(fù)印、縮印或其他方法保存學(xué)位論文。學(xué)位論文作者簽名導(dǎo)師簽名杏霧幻乜日期卅年R月葉日

簡介：碩士學(xué)位論文論網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻產(chǎn)業(yè)的著作權(quán)保護(hù)論網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻產(chǎn)業(yè)的著作權(quán)保護(hù)COPYRIGHTPROTECTIONOFONLINEVIDEO作者姓名王劍波指導(dǎo)教師曹偉副教授西南政法大學(xué)SOUTHWESTUNIVERSITYOFPOLITICALSCIENCEANDLAW1中文摘要近幾年隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻產(chǎn)業(yè)的快速發(fā)展，侵犯網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻著作權(quán)的現(xiàn)象有擴(kuò)大化、公開化的趨勢。視頻網(wǎng)站利用視頻鏈接、上傳的方式侵權(quán)，已成為侵權(quán)的主要群體，法律對(duì)侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象無力控制，權(quán)利人怠于維護(hù)自身權(quán)益，侵權(quán)者肆意妄為不畏懼法律的懲處。侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象失控的原因在于我國相關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律滯后，網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)管體制亟待完善，不法份子精于鉆法律“空子”，我們?cè)诰W(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻著作權(quán)保護(hù)的法律制定方面卻不善于補(bǔ)空。國外的法律又是如何規(guī)定，有哪些做法值得借鑒，我們將如何根治網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象。本文將從侵權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀談起，分析法律規(guī)定及其存在的問題，最后提出建議，分三個(gè)部分對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻著作權(quán)保護(hù)的問題進(jìn)行論述。第一部分是分析闡述我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻產(chǎn)業(yè)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀。網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展促進(jìn)了網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的創(chuàng)新，豐富了人民精神文化生活，推動(dòng)了網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)的繁榮。視頻網(wǎng)站在發(fā)展過程中面臨著市場競爭、盜版和版權(quán)成本壓力，部分網(wǎng)站利用搜索鏈接非法網(wǎng)站和虛假用戶上傳的方式侵犯視頻著作權(quán)獲取利益，相關(guān)訴訟案件急劇上升，土豆網(wǎng)、悠視網(wǎng)等知名視頻網(wǎng)站成為侵權(quán)被告，侵權(quán)現(xiàn)象日益嚴(yán)重。有提供搜索服務(wù)的網(wǎng)站未經(jīng)授權(quán)許可在線播放第三方網(wǎng)站的視頻資源，有運(yùn)用搜索技術(shù)鏈接非法網(wǎng)站視頻侵犯網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻著作權(quán)，或者將搜索得來的視頻文件編輯、加工后向用戶提供在線播放，網(wǎng)站認(rèn)為其鏈接播放行為只是提供中介服務(wù)，應(yīng)由提供侵權(quán)內(nèi)容的第三方網(wǎng)站承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。提供視頻上傳空間的網(wǎng)站，明知網(wǎng)友上傳的視頻侵權(quán)而不及時(shí)刪除，任由侵權(quán)內(nèi)容多次出現(xiàn)，疏于監(jiān)管，著作權(quán)人質(zhì)疑“網(wǎng)友”系網(wǎng)站操縱。筆者在各視頻網(wǎng)站截取了大量圖片，表明確實(shí)大量存在鏈接第三方網(wǎng)站和網(wǎng)友上傳的侵權(quán)視頻，正在熱播的電視電影毫無例外的被鏈接或上傳到視頻網(wǎng)站，而所謂的第三方網(wǎng)站大多是非法網(wǎng)站，有大量侵權(quán)視頻供搜索鏈接，似乎視頻網(wǎng)站與非法網(wǎng)站之間存在某種默契的合作。類似的侵權(quán)已不是個(gè)別行為，已經(jīng)由量變發(fā)生質(zhì)變。侵權(quán)的原因可歸結(jié)為視頻網(wǎng)站受利益驅(qū)動(dòng)鋌而走險(xiǎn)、法律針對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的監(jiān)管缺位、非法網(wǎng)站盜版源的存在。視頻網(wǎng)站主動(dòng)參與或幫助、縱容侵權(quán)的行為嚴(yán)重侵犯了網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻的著作權(quán)，破壞了公平競爭的市場環(huán)境，使國家法律的公信力遭到質(zhì)疑。第二部分是網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻著作權(quán)保護(hù)的法律分析。我國現(xiàn)行法律保護(hù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻著作權(quán)，同時(shí)針對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息流量大、難以控制的特點(diǎn)，為網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者制定可免責(zé)條款，其在

簡介：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文建筑作品著作權(quán)保護(hù)探析姓名李若穎申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)民商法指導(dǎo)教師南振興20090501建筑作品著作權(quán)保護(hù)探析2制的前提和合理使用的應(yīng)用。筆者認(rèn)為三種復(fù)制形式都構(gòu)成著作權(quán)法上的復(fù)制，并且在合理使用制度中否定了以商業(yè)性、營利性為目的的情況，這樣才能對(duì)建筑作品全面的保護(hù)。文章的最后通過對(duì)建筑作品侵權(quán)行為的特殊性分析，闡明建筑作品著作權(quán)的侵權(quán)歸責(zé)原則應(yīng)該適用無過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則。在侵權(quán)救濟(jì)方面，除民事刑事的救濟(jì)外，更需要借助行政機(jī)關(guān)或者裁判組織。關(guān)鍵詞關(guān)鍵詞建筑作品著作權(quán)獨(dú)創(chuàng)性侵權(quán)責(zé)任

簡介：廈門大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文著作權(quán)集體管理制度研究姓名劉鐘申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)民商法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師丁麗瑛20050901著作權(quán)集體管理制度研究度的潛力，并將成為未來的趨勢。第四章為著作權(quán)集體管理的具體問題。第一、介紹目前世界上通行著作權(quán)集體管理機(jī)構(gòu)的設(shè)置方法，提出賦予著作權(quán)集體管理組織一定的壟斷地位是最佳的設(shè)置機(jī)制，但也應(yīng)防止著作權(quán)集體管理組織利用其壟斷地位濫用權(quán)利第二、認(rèn)為著作權(quán)人與著作權(quán)集體管理之間存在兩種類型的關(guān)系代理或信托，并通過比較后得出采用信托關(guān)系比較合適的結(jié)論；第三、闡述了著作權(quán)集體管理組織的四項(xiàng)主要職能接受授權(quán)、發(fā)放許可、收取和分配作品使用費(fèi)、參加國際著作權(quán)組織進(jìn)行國際合作；第四、介紹了網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下數(shù)字技術(shù)給著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域造成的沖擊和挑戰(zhàn)，提出可以以著作權(quán)集體管理應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下數(shù)字技術(shù)帶來的問題。第五章為我國的著作權(quán)集體管理。在本章中筆者對(duì)我國的著作權(quán)集體管理的歷史及現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分析，并對(duì)著作權(quán)集體管理?xiàng)l例進(jìn)行了評(píng)析，提出了自己的見解。關(guān)鍵詞著作權(quán)集體管理

簡介：重慶大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文服裝作品的著作權(quán)保護(hù)研究姓名戴娜娜申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)民商法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師紀(jì)光兵20090524重慶人學(xué)碩十學(xué)位論文英文摘要ABSTRACTWORKSOFCLOTHING，WHICHHASTHEARTISTICFEATURES，ISTHEINTELLIGENTACHIEVEMENTSOFCLOTHINGDESIGNERS．THEWORKSISPROTECTEDBYTHECOPYRIGHTLAWINSOMEJURISDICTIONANDTHEINTERNATIONALCONVENTIONSONCOPYRIGHTPROTECTION．HOWEVER,INCHINA，THECOPYRIGHTLAWDOESN’TGIVEACLEARPRESCRIPTTHATWORKSOFCLOTHINGSHOULDBEATYPEOFPROTECTIVEWORKS。THEREFORE，INTHISTHESIS，BASEDONTHEMETHODSOFINDUCTION，COMPARISONANDDEDUCTION，F(xiàn)IRSTLY,FEASIBILITYOFCOPYRIGHTPROTECTIONABOUTWORKSOFCLOTHINGISDISCUSSED．THENNECESSITYOFCOPYRIGHTPROTECTIONABOUTWORKSOFCLOTHINGISDEMONSTRATEDBYTHECOMPARISONOFWORKSOFCLOTHINGANDPATENTPROTECTIONFORCLOTHINGDESIGN．FURTHERMORE，ONTHEBASISOFSTUDYINGTHEPROTECTIONSTATUSOFWORKSOFCLOTHINGATHOMEANDABROAD，LEGISLATIVESUGGESTIONSONHOWTOCONSUMMATECHINESECOPYRIGHTPROTECTIONOFWORKSOFCLOTHINGISPROPOSED．THISTHESISISCOMPOSEDOFTHREEPARTSINTRODUCTION，BODYANDCONCLUSION．THEBODYPARTCANBEDIVIDEDINTOFOURCHAPTERS．THEFIRSTCHAPTERISTHESUMMARYOFWORKSOFCLOTHINGWHOSECONNOTATION，SCOPE，CHARACTERISTICSASWELLASDISCRIMINATIONOFRELEVANTCONCEPTAREANALYZEDAFTERINTRODUCINGTHEBASICINFORMATIONOFCLOTHINGANDDRESSDESIGNING．THESECONDCHAPTERPRESENTSTHEFEASIBILITYOFCOPYRIGHTPROTECTIONABOUTWORKSOFCLOTHING．THISCHAPTERATFIRSTEXPLORESTHEATTRIBUTEOFWORKSOFCLOTHING，THEFIELDITBELONGSTOANDITSORIGINALITYWITHTHEBASICTHEORYOFWORKSOFCLOTHING，ANDTHENACHIEVESACONCLUSIONTHATCOPYRIGHTPROTECTIONABOUTWORKSOFCLOTHINGISFEASIBLEBOTHTHEORETICALLYANDPRACTICALLY．THETHIRDCHAPTERCOMPARESTHECOPYRIGHTOFWORKSOFCLOTHINGANDPATENTPROTECTIONFORCLOTHINGDESIGN．ITMAINLYINVESTIGATESABOUTTHEPRESENTSITUATIONOFPATENTPROTECTIONFORCLOTHINGDESIGNANDTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHETWOKINDSOFPROTECTION，UPONWHICHTHECONCLUSIONWASDRAWNTHATTHECOPYRIGHTOFWORKSOFCLOTHINGENJOYSTHEPRIORITYOFBEINGPROTECTEDANDTHEDOUBLEPROTECTIONMODELISFURTHEREXAMINED．THEFOURTHCHAPTERSTATESTHEINSTITUTIONALCONSTRUCTIONOFTHECOPYRIGHTPROTECTIONOFWORKSOFCLOTHING．BYANALYZINGTHEINTERNATIONALCONVENTIONS，THEPRESENTLEGISLATIVEII

簡介：河南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任姓名霍勇剛申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)民商法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李明山王明鎖20080501文中還討論了設(shè)立‘采取技術(shù)措施權(quán)’和‘加入權(quán)利管理信息權(quán)’的必要性。四、網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任種類。各種網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商提供服務(wù)的方式不同，承擔(dān)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任類型也不同。網(wǎng)絡(luò)內(nèi)容服務(wù)提供商主要涉及的是直接侵權(quán)責(zé)任；在線服務(wù)提供商主要涉及的是間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任，分為輔助侵權(quán)、替代侵權(quán)和引誘侵權(quán)。文中闡述了民法和傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)法中的間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任同網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)法中間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任的區(qū)別，指出單獨(dú)設(shè)立網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任的必要性。五、網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則類型化分析。網(wǎng)絡(luò)內(nèi)容服務(wù)提供商類似于傳統(tǒng)的出版商，對(duì)其應(yīng)適用無過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則。在線服務(wù)提供商在網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息傳輸過程中起到中介作用，對(duì)其則應(yīng)適用過錯(cuò)責(zé)任原則。六、網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任限制。為促進(jìn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)的健康發(fā)展，有必要對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任進(jìn)行必要的限制。對(duì)各類服務(wù)提供商，在滿足一定條件的前提下可免于承擔(dān)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。七、網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度的完善。為增強(qiáng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度的可操作性，本文嘗試著在確立網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度、引入對(duì)點(diǎn)對(duì)點(diǎn)P2P模式的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商進(jìn)行調(diào)整的“誘導(dǎo)規(guī)則”、明確認(rèn)定間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任時(shí)判斷主觀過錯(cuò)的依據(jù)等方面提出幾點(diǎn)建議。關(guān)鍵詞網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商；著作權(quán)；侵權(quán)責(zé)任

簡介：蘭州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文廣西“真龍”廣告語著作權(quán)案的案情考察及法律分析姓名肖江海申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)法律民商法指導(dǎo)教師劉斌斌20090501ABSTRACTCOLLECTEDWORKS，SUCHASCOLLECTEDWRITINGS，COLLECTEDICONS，ANDSOON，MEANTHATONEPARTYFORASPECIFICPURPOSESEEKSSOMEKINDOFWORKSFROMGENERALPUBLICTHATISNOTSPECIFIC，CANDIDATESCREATEWORKSINACCORDANCEWITHTHEREQUIREMENTSOFCREATIIONANDDELIVERTHECREATIVEWORKSGENERALLYANADVERTISEMENTITEMISSHORT，CONCISE，TOOFEWWORDS，THESPECIALNATUREOFADVERTISEMENTITEMSISOBVIOUSTHATPEOPLETENDTOIGNORETHECONDENSINGINTELLECTUALLABOR，ANDITSCOPYRIGHTISSUESOFTENARENOTPEOPLE’SATTENTIONINANUMBEROFCOPYRIGHTTORTCASES，TORTDISPUTEABOUTADVERTISEMENTITEMSONTHECOPYRIGHTBECOMEMOREANDMORECOMMON，ITHASAROUSEDAGREATDEALOFATTENTIONTHECASETHATLIUYIAPPEALEDTONANNINGCIGARETTEFACTORYANDNANNINGZHENLONGWEIYEADVERTISINGCORPORATIONISAVERYTYPICALCASEINTHENATIONALADVERTISEMENTITEMCOPYRIGHTTORTCASESINTHISCASE，“HOWHIGHISTHESKYPLEASEASKTHEREALDRAGON”，ANCOLLECTEDADVERTISEMENTITEMTRIGGEREDTHELONGDRAWNOUTCOPYRIGHTTORTLAWSUITSINCETHELAWDOESNOTPRESCRIBETHEISSUEOFCOPYRIGHTABOUTCOLLECTEDWORKSCLEARLYTHATTHECASERESULTEDINALOTOFDIFFERENTVIEWS，THECOURSECANBEUPSANDDOWNSALLTHEWAYDOWNTHISARTICLEISDIVIDEDINTOSIXPARTSINTHISPAPER，1WILLANALYZEANDEXPOUNDGUANGXI“ZHENLON96ADVERTISEMENTITEMCOPYRIGHTCASEINVOLVINGTHEMOSTCRITICALLEGALISSUESINTHEHOPEOFABREAKTHROUGHTOFINDASOLUTIONTOTHEPROBLEMFIRSTLY，THEPREAMBLEWILLINTRODUCETHATITISTHEPREMISEANDTHEFOUNDATIONTODISCUSSTHECASEABOUTCOPYRIGHTOF“ZHENLONG“ADVERTISEMENTITEMINGUANGXITHATCOLLECTEDADVERTISEMENTITEMSAREAPPLICABLETOTHEPROVISIONSONWORKSINCOPYRIGHTLAWTHEFIRSTPARTWILLINTRODUCETHEBASICFACTSANDTHEDISPUTEFOCUSⅡ

簡介：碩士學(xué)位論文碩士學(xué)位論文計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償問題案例研究侵權(quán)損害賠償問題案例研究CASERESEARCHONDAMAGESOFCOPYRIGHTOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARE院系凱原法學(xué)院系凱原法學(xué)院專業(yè)法律碩士（知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)方向）業(yè)法律碩士（知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)方向）姓名王培松名王培松指導(dǎo)教師壽指導(dǎo)教師壽步教授教授完成日期完成日期2010年4月30日IICASERESEARCHONDAMAGESOFCOPYRIGHTOFCOMPUTERSOFTWAREABSTRACTNOWTHEINFRINGEMENTOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTISRATHERSERIOUSASDAMAGESISTHEMOSTDIRECTANDEFFICIENTRELIEFTOTHECOPYRIGHTOWNER,IT’SOFPRACTICALSIGNIFICANCETORESEARCHONTHISISSUETHISDISSERTATIONFOCUSESONTHECASESOFDAMAGESINCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHTINORDERTOSTUDYRELEVANTACADEMICANDPRACTICALISSUES,WHICHINCLUDINGPRECONDITIONS,CHOICESANDDETERMINATIONOFTHEAMOUNTTHISDISSERTATIONINCLUDESFOURPARTSTHEFIRSTPARTPRESENTSTHEDEFINITIONOFCOMPUTERSOFTWAREINFRINGEMENTANDTHENATUREOFDAMAGESITISPOINTEDOUTTHATSUBJECTIVEFAULTWILLNEVERBECONSIDEREDWHENTODETERMINEINFRINGEMENTSUBJECTIVEFAULTISTHECRUCIALFACTOROFDAMAGESTHESECONDPARTANALYZESTHELEGISLATIVEPROFILEOFDAMAGESINCHINAANDINDICATESTHATLEGISLATIVECONFUSION,LEGALFEES,ANDDETAILCONDITIONSOFAPPLICATIONSARETHEDEFECTSTHISPARTALSOAPPROACHESTHEAPPLICATIONOFDAMAGESBASEDONTHECASEOFSHIPUSOFTWARECO,LTDVDIDAKONGJIANINFORMATIONCO,LTDTHETHIRDPARTFURTHERDISCUSSESTHETWOIMPORTANTFACTORSWHENUSINGTHETHREEMETHODSTOCALCULATEDAMAGESOFINFRINGEMENTOFCOMPUTERSOFTWARECOPYRIGHT,WHICHARECHOICEOFMETHODANDBURDENOFPROOFTHELASTPARTCONFIRMSTHETHREEMETHODSANDDISSERTSONTHEPRECONDITIONSANDCALCULATIONSINDETAILCOMBINEDWITHCOURTDECISIONSKEYWORDSCOMPUTER，SOFTWARE，COPYRIGHT，INFRINGEMENT,DAMAGES