程度副詞“很”、“極”、“死”、“壞”研究.pdf

1、上海師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文程度副詞“很”、“極”、“死”、“壞”研究姓名：李永斗申請學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：齊滬揚(yáng)20050501AbstractionThisthesisdiscussesthesimilarityanddiferenceamongfourrelatedadverbs’‘很，，、“極，’、“死，，、“壞，ofmodemChinese.Grammaticalizationtheoryisalsous

2、edtogivearudimentaldiachronicexplanatory.Therearefivemorepartsinthethesisbesidestheintroduction.Focusedonbeingafullandaccuratedescriptionofthedistributionofthesefoureasilyentangledadverbsthisthesisusescomparativemethodto

3、showtheirsubtlesimilarityanddiferenceandtrytoexplainthemfromadiachronicviewwishingtobeusefulreferenceforthosewhotakeChineseasasecondlanguage.Intheintroductiontheauthorlooksbacktheproductionandproblemsstillexistedinthisfi

4、eldandpointsoutthatforthosewhotakeChineseasasecondlanguagethedescriptionexistedisnotfullandaccurateenoughshowingtheimportancetoconstituteafullrangedcomparison.Thesourceofexamplesinthisthesisandthethoughtinwritingthisthes

5、isarealsoshowninthispart.PartonegivesaroundeddistributionofthesefouradverbsinmodernChineseforthosewhotakeChineseasasecondlanguageandpaysalotofattentiontotheplacewheretheycanoccur.theconstraintwhentheycoincidewithverbsand

6、adjectives(especiallythegrammaticalroletheycanplayinasentencetherestrictiononsyllableandsemanticcharacteristicofrelatedverbsandadjectives).Parttwotakesacomparativeviewonthesimilarityanddiferenceamongthesefourrelatedadver

7、bsrespectivelyandaguesthattheheterogeneityoftheirsemantictraitsandgrammaticaljzedlevelresultsinthem.Partthreeisaconclusionoftheaforementionedcomparisoninthreepartsandarguesthatitisthediferentstartpointoftheirgrammaticali

8、zationthatgiveintotheirsimilarityanddiferenceinmodernChinese.PartfourstudiessomegrammaticalizationevolvementrelatedtothesefouradverbsincludingthediferencebetweentheadverbsusedinancientChineseandthoseinmodernChinese.thegr