英語(yǔ)科技論文寫(xiě)作與投稿

1、英語(yǔ)科技論文寫(xiě)作與投稿,湖南科技大學(xué) 土木工程學(xué)院 工程力學(xué)系,胡 輝,Why scientists publish?,As Robert Day says in How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (1998), “The goal of scientific research is publication….A scientific experiment, no matter

2、 how spectacular the results, is not complete until the results are published.”,科研成果如果沒(méi)有發(fā)表，就等于不存在！,Why scientists publish?,No publication…………. No projectNo publication………….No fundingNo publication…………No promotionNo

3、 publication….Scientific & academic death,Publishing your work is vital for success,“There is no way to get experience except through experience.”,英語(yǔ)科技論文寫(xiě)作捷徑：模仿,寫(xiě)作英語(yǔ)論文時(shí)，文中的如何一個(gè)句子都應(yīng)該是模

4、仿而來(lái)的！,怎樣模仿？,就從我的第一篇英語(yǔ)文章談起,從拋物運(yùn)動(dòng)的研究看創(chuàng)新思維,水平射程為：,顯然當(dāng)θ＝450時(shí)有最大射程,拋物運(yùn)動(dòng)是如此簡(jiǎn)單，一般認(rèn)為沒(méi)什么新的令人感興趣的性質(zhì)值得人們?nèi)パ芯苛?。然?999年第2期美國(guó)的《物理教師》（ The Physics Teacher ）發(fā)表了一篇文章，文章研究了拋物體軌跡長(zhǎng)度的表達(dá)式：,,令,文章得出當(dāng)θ＝56.460時(shí)L有極大值。,令,得出當(dāng)θ＝600時(shí)A有極大值。,,,看到這篇文章三天以后

5、，我將上面的推導(dǎo)寫(xiě)成一篇題目為“Another Look at Projectile Motion”的文章并于2000年5月寄給美國(guó)《物理教師》當(dāng)時(shí)的主編Clifford E. Swartz 教授，Swartz 教授在收到該文后即馬上回信稱(chēng)這是一篇有趣的文章并表示《物理教師》將予以發(fā)表。,發(fā)表在2000年第7期（October 2000）,如何用英文描述拋物線與x軸所圍的面積？,Let A(θ) be the area bounded

6、by the path of the projectile and the horizontal axis. Then we have,研究創(chuàng)新的三部曲,1. 具備相關(guān)的基本知識(shí)。,本例中需要具備拋物運(yùn)動(dòng)的基本知識(shí)，知道450時(shí)有最大的水平射程。,2. 需要了解國(guó)內(nèi)外研究動(dòng)態(tài)（知道別人目前 在研究什么？）。,本例中需要知道有人在研究拋物運(yùn)動(dòng)的軌跡的極值問(wèn)題。,3. 自己可以研究什么？,例如本例中研究拋物軌跡面積的極值。,

7、只有具備了研究創(chuàng)新能力，有東西可寫(xiě)，才會(huì)關(guān)注英文論文的寫(xiě)作。,Structure of a Manuscript,A manuscript is typically composed of a number of sections: 1) Title2) Abstract; 3) Keywords; 4) Introduction; 5) Materials and Methods; 6) Results;

8、 7) Discussion; 8) Conclusions; 9) References; 10) Tables; 11)Figures.,The IMRAD Formatfor Scientific Papers,Introduction: What was the question?Methods: How did you try to answ

9、er it?Results: What did you find?And Discussion: What does it mean?,Key element that advertises the paper’s contents論文的“標(biāo)簽”, 表達(dá)不當(dāng)會(huì)使真正需要它的讀者錯(cuò)過(guò)閱讀的機(jī)會(huì)；幫助文獻(xiàn)追蹤或檢索Be as specific as possibleInclude main aspects of stud

10、y including model usedAvoid long title Often helpful to choose the title when the paper is almost complete,Title,一般不超過(guò)12個(gè)詞,Abstract,An abstract is a shortened version of the paper. It should contain these four element

11、s:,1) the purpose of the study (the central question);2) a brief statement of what was done (Methods);3) a brief statement of what was found (Results);4) a brief statement of what was concluded (Discussion, in

12、 part).,Abstract 第一句可寫(xiě)方法或目的,例如：,最后寫(xiě)Abstract,An iterative technique is used to calculate a higher-order approximation to the periodic solutions of a conservative oscillator.,Keywords,不要使用過(guò)于寬泛的詞做關(guān)鍵詞(例如：有機(jī)化合物，力學(xué)，等等)，以免失去檢索的

13、作用。,Most journals require the author to identify three or four key words which represent the major concept of the paper.,關(guān)鍵詞的排序：,研究目的；研究方法；研究結(jié)果,Introduction,Structure of the Introduction,Introduction typically should be

14、funnel-shaped, moving from general to specificA common structure:Information on importance of topicHighlights of relevant previous researchIdentification of unanswered question(s)Approach you used to seek the answer

15、(s)(In some fields) your main findings,Materials and Methods,有人認(rèn)為：A good place to start for beginning authorsShould be the easiest section of the paper to write,This section is to provide enough detail for another sci

16、entist to repeat your study and reproduce the results.,Materials and Methods usually answer the following questions:1.What materials were used?2.How were they used?3.When and where was the experiment performed a

17、nd data collected? - Most important in field studies,Methods: Amount of Detail to Use,For well-known methods: name of method, citation of referenceFor methods previously described but not well known: brief descrip

18、tion of method, citation of referenceFor methods that you yourself devise: relatively detailed description,Results,This section is obviously the heart of the paper.,Objective presentation of experiment results Summary

19、of dataNOT a Discussion!,Common mistakesDiscussion and interpretation of dataNo figures or tables,“A picture is worth a thousand words.”,Discussion,Interpret results Did the study confirm/deny the hypothesis?Do resu

20、lts agree with other research? Implications of study for fieldSuggestions for improvement and future research?Discuss weaknesses and discrepancies,Conclusions,Major findings: some kind of summary without being a summa

21、rySome outlook of the usage Limitations of the study, be honestFuture research,注意：1） It is not the function of this section to summarise the study; this is the purpose of the abstract.,2) New information must not be

22、included in the conclusions.,Acknowledgments,A place to thank people who helped with the work but did not make contributions deserving authorshipSometimes the place where sources of financial support are stated,（Functio

23、ns of ）References,To give credit to others for their workTo add credibility to your work by showing that you used valid information sourcesTo help show how your work is related to previous workTo help readers find fur

24、ther information,Another Reason Your References Should Be Accurate,Often, authors whose work you cite will be your peer reviewers. Inaccurate references to their work will not impress them favorably.,Other Advice on Ref

25、erences,Cite only items that you have read. Carefully follow the journal’s instructions to authors.Use other articles in the same journal as models.Have recent references if possible,Tables and figures,Present only i

26、mportant data.Avoid complex tables and figures.,A caption should contain sufficient information so that a reader can understand a table or figure without reference to the text.,captions to Tables and figures,Orders of R

27、eading and WritingSections of a Paper,People read the sections of scientific papers in various orders.You can write the sections of a scientific paper in any order.A convenient order in which to write the sections: Me

28、thods, Results, Discussion, Introduction,What makes a good research paper?,Good science Good writing Publication in good journals,Target audience“Who would be interested in reading this paper?”Import and significan

29、ce of the findingsPrestige of the journal [Impact factor],Choosing the right journal,Online submission,Many journals now encourage authors to submit their articles online (some journals will only accept online submiss

30、ion).,Submission (投稿),Know the journal, its editors, and why you submitted the paper there2. Read carefully and conform to “Instructions for Authors”,3. Use other articles in the same journal as models.,Submi

31、ssion (投稿),Cover letter (投稿信)ManuscriptFiguresTablesPotential Reviewers,,Cover lettersummarize main points of manuscriptwhy of interest to that journal and its readersthe submitted work has not previously been pub

32、lished in full, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere.possible reviewersanyone you do not wish to serve as a reviewer,Dear Professor ….:Please find enclosed our manuscript “Cluster Formation and Rheol

33、ogy of Photoreactive Nanoparticles”.This study describes the cluster formation of photoreactive nanoparticles upon irradiation, and the effect of this process on the rheological behavior of dilute colloidal dispersions

34、.We believe this manuscript to be of interest to many readers of Langmuir and hope it is suitable for publication.Sincerely,Dear Editor,My manuscript entitled “…” has not been published previously and is not current

35、ly under review by another journal.I would be grateful if my manuscript could be reviewed and considered for publication in 雜志名.Thank you.kind regards,姓名School of Civil EngineeringHunan University of Science and Te

36、chnology Xiangtan, Hunan 411201People’s Republic of China.Email:,Cover letter (投稿信),,Cover Letters,main findings significance suggested reviewers “not to review” list who have read,SUBMISSION●Address letter

37、to Editor●Describe paper in 3-4 sentences●Why it is appropriate to this journal●If allowable, suggest reviewers●Define any competitors who you feel would give unfair review●Signatures of all coauthors on statem

38、ent of authenticity/responsibility,Dear Editor,We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled "GDNF Acutely Modulates Neuronal Excitability and A-type Potassium Channels in Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons&q

39、uot;, which we wish to be considered for publication in Nature Neuroscience. GDNF has long been thought to be a potent neurotrophic factor for the survival of midbrain dopaminergic neurons, which are degenerated in Par

40、kinson’s disease. In this paper, we report an unexpected, acute effect of GDNF on A-type potassium channels, leading to a potentiation of neuronal excitability, in the dopaminergic neurons in culture as well as in adult

41、brain slices. Further, we show that GDNF regulates the K+ channels through a mechanism that involves activation of MAP kinase. Thus, this study has revealed, for the first time, an acute modulation of ion channels by GDN

42、F. Our findings challenge the classic view of GDNF as a long-term survival factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons, and suggest that the normal function of GDNF is to regulate neuronal excitability, and consequently dop

43、amine release. These results may also have implications in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Due to a direct competition and conflict of interest, we request that Drs. XXX of Harvard Univ., and YY of Yale Univ. not

44、be considered as reviewers. With thanks for your consideration, I am Sincerely yours,,Dear Editor: Enclosed are copies of a manuscript entitled "BDNF and NT-4/5 Promote the Development of Long-Term Potentiat

45、ion in the Hippocampus", which we wish to be considered for publication in Nature. As you know, there is a great deal of interest and excitement recently in understanding the role of neurotrophins in synapse devel

46、opment and plasticity. Our manuscript provides, for the first time, the physiological evidence that neurotrophins regulate long-term potentiation (LTP). The main point of the paper is that the neurotrophins BDNF and NT

47、-4 induce an earlier appearance of LTP in developing hippocampus. In contrast to recent Science article by Erin Schuman's group, we (and several other LTP groups) did not see that BDNF enhance basal synaptic transm

48、ission in adullt hippocampus. However, we found that in adult hippocampus, inhibition of BDNF/TrkB activity attenuated LTP, and weak tetanus that normally cannot induce LTP produced enduring LTP. These findings may hav

49、e implications in the basic mechanism for regulation of synapse development and long-term modulation of synaptic efficacy.  Because of the rather competitive nature of the field and the important implication of o

50、ur findings, we have not yet presented this work in any public forum. However, confidential discussion with several prominent neuroscientists such as 111 and 222 have generated tremendous excitement. Thus, we feel that

51、 this work is of general interest and is suitable for publication in Nature. We would like to suggest Drs. aaa of Yale Univ., bbb of Harvard Medical School, and ccc of Univ. of California-Berkeley, as reviewers for this

52、 manuscript. Due to a direct competition and conflict of interest, we request that Dr. XX and YY. not be considered as reviewers.  Thank you very much for your consideration.,Cover Letter,Your chance to speak to

53、 the editor directlySubmitted along with your manuscriptMention what would make your manuscript special to the journalNote special requirements (reviewers, conflicts of interest),,Responding to reviewers,Carefully

54、prepare your responsesEach comment should be addressedEach change should be statedReviewer may be wrong,Revising papers,3. Sincerely thank the editor and reviewers for helping you to improve your work.,Keep to dea

55、dline for submission of revised manuscriptReturn the revised manuscript to the editor with a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments,,Revise your paper,Be calm about reviewers criticisms. Always make editor

56、 your friend Never argue with reviewers Try to do everything that reviewers ask Seize the opportunity when reviewers make mistakes,RESPONSE LETTER WITH REVISION●Segregate responses to Editor and each reviewer●

57、Repeat responses to each reviewer even if already responded to another●Respond to each comment (consider numbering)●Start with polite intro to each reviewer:“We are grateful to reviewer A for useful comments ....”

58、●Consider placing Reviewer’s comment in letter immediately above your response●Make sure pagination of initial and revision are synchronous and differences stated●Don’t try to “muscle” the Reviewer!,You will be requ

59、ested to sign the “Transfer of Copyright Agreement form”,Check the proofs,You may only have 24-48 hr to return the proofs.,Do We Have to Pay for Publication?,1. The majority of SCI source magazines don’t char

60、ge a fee for publication,2. You may have to pay for extra pages for papers which are longer than “normal”,3. You may be requested to pay for colour reproduction of figures,You may be able to track your

61、 article on-line any time!,You will receive a PDF file, sample magazines and/or offprints after publication,As a rule, use past tense to describe events that have happened. Such events include procedures tha

62、t you have conducted and results that you observed. Use present tense to describe generally accepted facts.,Verb tense,Verb tense,Introduction, Materials & Methods, and Results: paste tenseDiscussion: present tens

63、e,Looking over other scientific papers may help you answer questions you might have on this topic.,Active voice is stronger and shorter than passive voice“Dr. Qian wrote the article.” “The article was written by Dr. Qi

64、an.”P(pán)assive voice is preferred when: The doer is unknown 不知道實(shí)施方是誰(shuí) The doer must remain unidentified 實(shí)施方不能被點(diǎn)明 The receiver of the action is more important than the doer 動(dòng)作的受眾比實(shí)施方更重要,Active vs Passive Voice,Author

65、s sometimes resort to the passive voice to avoid the presumed immodesty of the personal pronoun ‘I.’ It is a false modesty.Passive voice is characterized by weak verbs. ‘To be’ is a prime offender. Scrutinize every is,

66、are, was or were.,Active vs Passive Voice,American Journal of Physics,2004年第九期：,“Quantum harmonic oscillator revisited ”,Abstract 的第一句：,I present a Fourier transform approach to the problem of finding the stationary stat

67、es of a quantum harmonic oscillator .,正文中的：,In this note, I present yet another approach to the same problem that relies on a simple Fourier transformation.,I begin by introducing……,,,,Only one idea in a sentence Keep s

68、hort: <20 words Vary length Long sentences: greater risk of grammatical error,Writing: Sentences,Paragraph structure,Discuss only one subject in a paragraph.Start with a good topic sentence that creates a smo