版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、南京師范大學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文教育自由及其限度姓名:周興國申請學(xué)位級別:博士專業(yè):教育學(xué)原理指導(dǎo)教師:金生鈜20070529AbstractThethemeofthethesisfocusesondiscussingfreedomandlimitationproblemexistinginChild—educationsystemTherearetwoaspectsofmeaningwithrespecttofreedomofchildedu
2、cation:firstasbeingeducatedonechildcouldbefreefromsomelimitation&restrietionandavoidinappropriateinterferencefrompedagogues;second,onechildiscapabletoactfreelyanddowhattheywantThjsmeansthatachildcouldinvolveinthebasicedu
3、cationprovidedbythesocietyAstheconceptofrightkeepsdevelopingnowadays,andbeginstoenterintoeducationsystem,freedomofachild,existingineducation,hasbeencognizedgraduallyWhentheconceptofrightentersintoeducationfield,theconcep
4、toffreedomcomeaboutandhasbeenbeingestablishedgraduallytherebyandithasbroughtintonewdiscussionsabouttherational姆ofcompulsiveeducationEducationhasbeendefinedtobeakindofcompulsiveconception(educationisequivalenttocompulsion
5、)thereforetheremightbeconflictstakingplacelogicallybetweeneducationandpassivefreedomTheseconflictsgobetweenadultsandchildrenideelityandfreedom,aswellasgoodnessandfreedometcHoweveritdoesriotmeanttlatfreedomofeducationissh
6、ortofrationalitynmvalueofsuchkindoffl倒omexistingineducation,couldberepresentedasthatitcouldprovideachildwithpossibilityofcharacteristicdevelopmentMeanwhilefreedomhascloserelationwithequivalent,justice,obligationandorderw
7、ithrespecttoeducationAchild’sbasicfreedom,existingineducation,mainlyincludestwoaspects:(i)asforthepositivemeaningoffreedomitallowsachildtotakepartineducatingaction;(i)asforthepassivemeaningoffreedom,itcausesachildtogetaw
8、ayfrominterferenceandcompulsion,anditismadeupofthoughtfreedomandaction—freedomInthepracticinghistoryofhumaneducation,therearctwokindsofextremityformsexistinginchildeducation:lackfreedomandoverereedomAchild’sbasicfreedomi
9、neducationrequiresthatpedagoguesgiveuptraditionaleducatingandmanagingmethods,tomakeeducationmoreinstructional,b珥notcompulsiveAchlidseducationfreedomisalsestrictedwhichwillprovidecompulsionofeducationwithreasonableassural
10、lceⅥ,11enachildsfreedomgoesbeyondthisrestriction,negativeeffectswillbebroughttoeducationorders,interestofotherpersonsandthechildhimselfandatthismomenlpedagoguesshallhavetoadoptanappropriatecompulsivemethodtestoresuchkind
11、offreedomtoitscorrectstateHoweverthisdoesnotmeanthatpedagogues’compulsivemalLrlerwillnotbelimitedInfacttheyshouldkeeptheconceptoffreedomtoleadthechildt0realizerightsofotherpeopleAndtheyalsoshouldtreatthechildwithforgivin
12、gheartsAseducationfreedomdevelopsfromconceptualformtopracticableform,itsfeasibilitywillrelyontheprocedurethroughwhichtheconceptofgoodnessdiffersfromsingletocommonmeanwhileeducationshallbetakenasareflectionofpublicwilloft
13、hesocietyThereforeeducationfreedomisnecessarytomeettherequirementofcommongoodnessandpublicwillItisexecutableforeducationfreedomtoreachpracticeform,andunderthiseducatingconcⅪ鷗assuranceoffreedomgrantstherighttobepriorwithr
14、especttogoodnessFreedomeducationacceptscompulsiveeducationtherein。butitwillnotbeimplementedbythecompulsivemannerHoweverestablishmentoffreedomconceptineducationwillbethebasicassur∞ceOnlybycarryingoutfreedomconceptinthebas
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 教育自由及其限度(1)
- 勞動合同自由及其限度研究.pdf
- 大學(xué)生消極自由及其限度.pdf
- 論法官自由裁量權(quán)及其限度.pdf
- 教師課堂教學(xué)自由及其限度研究.pdf
- 學(xué)習(xí)自由限度之研究.pdf
- 植入廣告表達自由的法律限度.pdf
- 商業(yè)性表達自由的限度.pdf
- 沉默及其限度
- 論法官自由裁量權(quán)的限度.pdf
- 自由教育及其當(dāng)代形態(tài).pdf
- 論啟蒙及其限度.pdf
- 論國家能力及其限度.pdf
- 論能動司法及其限度.pdf
- 公民政治表達自由正當(dāng)性限度研究.pdf
- 表達自由的邊界——從互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的角度看表達自由的限度.pdf
- 網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代下政府與個人自由的限度
- 論可譯性及其限度.pdf
- 論特殊防衛(wèi)權(quán)及其限度.pdf
- 司法改革背景下法官自由裁量權(quán)的限度.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論