論刑訊逼供——以保障人權(quán)為視角.pdf

1、蘇州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論刑訊逼供——以保障人權(quán)為視角姓名：曾樹軍申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：法律法理學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：王澤紅20091001OntheExtractionofConfessionbyTorture一FromtheViewAngleoftheProtectionofHumanRightSOntheExtractionofConfessionbyTortureFromtheViewAngleoftheProtectionofHumanR

2、ightsAbstractTheextortingconfessionsbytortureinChinaislegallynotonlysuchaphenomenonunabletostopdespiterepeatedprohibitionbutalsoaverycommonphenomenoninthejudicialpractice，whichiscontrarytomodemrequirementsoflitigationciv

3、ilizationandjudicialdemocracyWiththe”ruleoflaw”developscontinuouslyinvariousfieldsofsociallife，theextortingconfessionsbytorturehasbecometheuglybehaviorwhichiswidelyreviledHowtocurbtheextortingconfessionsbytorturetothehig

4、hestextenthasbecomeacommontopicbetweenscholarsandjudicialpractitionersIntheshadowoftheextortingconfessionsbytorture，thehumanrightsarebeingtrampledseriouslyandtheunjustcaseinevitablystagedThereasonswhytheextortingconfessi

5、onsbytortureisunabletostopdespiterepeatedprohibitionarerootedintheideologicallevel，thelegislativedefectsandtheobjectivelyhelplesspractice”ButtheweakprotectionofhumanrightsisthemainreasonTocompletelyprohibittheextortingco

6、nfessionsbYtorturecurrentlyisjustasignofderangementOnthecontraryinterposingtheappropriatecurbingmeasuresfairlyisarationalmoveItworksonlywhenthephysicalandproceduralapproachesarecarriedonCopyingthepracticesofwesterncountr

7、iesdoesnotnecessarilyapplytoChinasstatusquoAndcarryingoutsometechnicalsupervisiond印eIlCbontheloyaltyofexecutorsItisagoodapproachtoproblemstoexpandtheliabilitysubjectsproperlyandimplementtheburdenofproofreversedwhichCallm

8、akethosewhoextortaconfessionbytorturefileunwillingandafraidtopracticeIdliketoputforwardsomeimmatureideasfromthispointofviewKeywords：theextortingconfessionsbYtorture，humanrightsprotectiontheburdenofproofreversedⅡWrittenby