民事訴訟舉證責(zé)任分配.pdf

1、鄭州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文民事訴訟舉證責(zé)任分配姓名：陳世軍申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專(zhuān)業(yè)：法律指導(dǎo)教師：周慶20060401正義。由于法律要件分類(lèi)說(shuō)難以提出平衡當(dāng)事人舉證責(zé)任的有效對(duì)策，故舉證責(zé)任倒置規(guī)則就應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。舉證責(zé)任制度存在意義在于，一是通過(guò)當(dāng)事人雙方舉證過(guò)程的對(duì)抗使法官發(fā)現(xiàn)案件的真實(shí)，二是在案件事實(shí)真?zhèn)尾幻鲿r(shí)確定實(shí)體責(zé)任的負(fù)擔(dān)者。但是，如果當(dāng)事人的主張因系眾所周知的或可以通過(guò)推定法則得出某一事實(shí)客觀存在的，法官借此可直接發(fā)現(xiàn)案件的真實(shí)；或者

2、一方當(dāng)事人對(duì)對(duì)方當(dāng)事人所主張不利于己方的事實(shí)承認(rèn)為真實(shí)時(shí)，舉證責(zé)任制度所負(fù)有的確定實(shí)體責(zé)任由哪一方負(fù)擔(dān)的功能便不復(fù)存在。因此，在上述情形下，當(dāng)事人對(duì)于自己所主張的事實(shí)無(wú)需舉證，可直接被法官認(rèn)定而作為判案的依據(jù)。關(guān)鍵詞：民事訴訟舉證責(zé)任分配AbstractneCo皿’sdutyissolvingtllebomerbetweenmepartiesNorInallymeCounmustconfinnmefact矗rstlyt11atbased

3、onmeproofswhenmeymakeajudgememThefinaljudgementshouldbemadenootllertllaIlthedefi血efIactsandsuitlawIt’sdefinitethatt11efhctmatnlepartyclaimedoccurredornotbyinvestigating廿1eevidence，Ⅱ1erearenotfomlingareqlliredevidence，aIl

4、d“isnotmesituationthatthecouncallnotjudge齜caseBut，iftheCollnaIld也eboⅡlpartieshavcnoevidcnceforacasethesituationwouldoccurtllatt11efactis協(xié)lthorf甜seUnderthiscond“iontheCourtcann’trcfusetojudgeala_wsllitbec哪ethef如tisnotcle札

5、So，ift11eCouncann’tmakeajudgememtoacase，也econnictsbetweenpaniescann’tbesolved，thegoaloflawsystem、Ⅳ0111dnotbereachedOIllyt、vesllltsofajudgement，eitller也eaccuserloset11el踟11it，ortheaccuseddoWbll，whosholllda怕rdtllebllrdenof

6、proofwhoshould洲髓rlosinglaw砌tnis恤legalquestionmathowtodistributet11ebllrdenofproof‘Commonly，t11efktc釉’tbeclearedafternlcpar哆carryoutt11ebIlrdenofprove，causetonleresul血gbllrdenofpmofSo，wbat協(xié)efktisnotclearistllenecessaryfac

7、torforamemionedcaseThere8retwoquestionsneedtocI謝fyforalHlcle耐ngfact：(1)t11atthef抵istn曲ornotaccordingtomejudge’ssubjectiondecision，oIllyiftllejudgenlir血thebothpany’sevidencecallll’tmal(ehimconfimlinhismind(2)thereare鉀∞mai