論專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制度.pdf

1、摘要專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制度在當(dāng)今世界知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)迅猛發(fā)展的大環(huán)境下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)訴訟制度中具有重要的穩(wěn)定功能和平衡作用，專利侵權(quán)訴訟作為一種特殊的民事訴訟，具有自身的特點(diǎn)，專利權(quán)客體所具有的科技屬性，在該權(quán)利被侵犯時(shí)才會(huì)顯現(xiàn)出來，專利侵權(quán)訴訟過程中的侵權(quán)行為判定、賠償數(shù)額的計(jì)算、侵權(quán)證據(jù)的收集和侵權(quán)證據(jù)所具有的復(fù)雜性，這些重要特征都是增加專利侵權(quán)訴訟復(fù)雜程度和審理難度的根本原因，因此，專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制度的設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)具有針對(duì)性，專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制

2、度的完善，要貼合專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制度的特性，認(rèn)識(shí)和掌握專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制度的理論，區(qū)別專利侵權(quán)訴訟不同于一般民事訴訟救濟(jì)制度的特殊性，借鑒國際專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制度的理論與實(shí)務(wù)，結(jié)合國內(nèi)外專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制度的運(yùn)行狀況，從即發(fā)專利侵權(quán)行為的臨時(shí)措施、訴前證據(jù)保全制度、專利侵權(quán)損害賠償制度和專利專家陪審制度等四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析和研究，提出完善我國專利侵權(quán)訴訟救濟(jì)制度的建設(shè)性意見。關(guān)鍵詞：專利侵權(quán)；訴訟救濟(jì)；制度構(gòu)建；完善AbstractfII

3、[IfIlIIfllrllllltflfI[f[1llI[1ll[IlrUlll[10Y2042913DuringthequicklydevelopmentoftheIntellectualProperty，theReliefSystemoflawsuitforpatentinfringementiStakingamoreandmoreimportantpartintheworldButbeforethestudyoftherelate

4、dquestionsaboutlawsuitforpatentinfringement，thethingmatshouldbesaleislawsuitforpatentinfringementiSakindofspeciallawsuitIthasitsuniquecharaCtersFirst，thepatenthasthetechnicalattribute，andonlywhenthepatentinfringementhapp

5、ened，itcouldbeshowedSecond，lawsuitforpatentinfringementhascomplexityItcanbedisplayedinthejudgmentoftheinfringement，inthedeterminationofcompensationandinthecollectionoftheevidencesThosecharactersarethemajorreasonswhichinc

6、reasethedifficultyandcomplexityoflawsuitforpatentinfringementSothesystemoflawsuitforpatentinfringementshouldhavepointedAndtheconsummationofpatentinfringement1awsuitshouldfititselfcharactersAftertheintroductionoftherelief

7、systemoflawsuitforpatentinfringement，thisarticleobtainsfromthepatentinfringementlawsuitandstudiesthesituationofdomesticandforeignItanalyzesfrominjunction，evidencepreservations，compensationandpatentexpertjurysystemandcons