外商直接投資能長期促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長嗎？【外文翻譯】

1、0本科畢業(yè)論文外文翻譯本科畢業(yè)論文外文翻譯外文題目外文題目:Dosefeigndirectinvestmentalwaysenhanceeconomicgrowth出處：處：KYKLOSVol.562003F.4491508作者:JozeMencinger原文：文：DoesFeignDirectInvestmentAlwaysEnhanceEconomicGrowthJozeMencingerIntroductionFinternati

2、onalfinancialinstitutionspoliticiansthevastmajityofeconomistsfeigndirectinvestment(FDI)appearstobeastofpanaceafeveryeconomicproblemintheemergingmarketeconomiesitspositiveimpactoneconomicgrowthhasacquiredthestatusofconven

3、tionalfact.Economictheynamelysuggeststhatunfetteredinternationalcapitalflowsfosterefficientallocationofresourceswhichbyitselfshouldpromotegrowth.TheeconomicbenefitsofFDIareconsideredtobetwofold.FirstFDIcanhelpcountriesif

4、domesticsavingsareinsufficienttofinanceeconomicexpansionsecondlyafeigncpatepresenceisassociatedwithpositiveexternalities.ThealmostdesperateefftsofmanycountriestoattractasmuchFDIaspossibleindirectlysupptthethey.Howeversub

5、stantialgainsofinwardFDIfthehostcountrieshavebeenmuchmeassertedthanconfirmedbyempiricalevidence.TheresultsofarapidlygrowingnumberofempiricalstudiesontherelationbetweenFDIeconomicgrowthdifferalthoughmoststudiesstartwithes

6、sentiallythesamebenchmarkcrosscountrygrowthmodel.Thedifferencesinthesetsofthecountriesincludedsampleperiodsdataestimationtechniqueshampercomparisonsacrossthestudies(Edisonetal.2002).Inmanystudiesdealingwithsubsetsoftheco

7、untriesFDIFDIincombinationwithsomeotherfactfactsispositivelyrelatedtogrowthwhileseveralstudies(Rodrik1998GrilliMilesiFerretti1995Kraay2acknowledgedasfunctioningmarketeconomiesbyEUstardsbecamecidatesfentryin20041.Secondly

8、transitionbroughtafundamentalbreakinthewayinwhicheconomiesfunctionthetransitionperiodinthenarrowsenseshouldnotbeincludedinthesample2.WithbothrestrictionswegetamuchnarrowersetoftransitioncountriesthantheoneusedbyCamposKin

9、oshita(2002).Letusbeginbyexplingtimeseriesdatafeachcountrycrosssectiondatafeachyearbyobservingsimplerelationshipsbetweenthegrowthofgrossdomesticproduct(rGDP)theratiooffeigndirectinvestmentgrossdomesticproduct(FDI)thelatt

10、errepresentingalsoakindof‘revealed’liberalizationofcapitalaccount.TheaverageFDIinthe1994–2001periodwas4.14percentrangingbetween6.05percentinEstonia1.32percentinSloveniawhilethegrowthofGDPby3.65percentayearwasrangingbetwe

11、en4.87percentinPol1.97percentinCzechRepublic.GrowthwasmoststableinSloveniamostunstableinLithuania.CrelationcoefficientsbetweengrowthcrespondingFDIarenegativeinsevenoutoftheeightcountriespositiveinLithuaniaifdataarepooled

12、thesimplecrelationcoefficientremainsnegative.AsimilarnegativeresultisobtainedbyobservingcrosssectiondatafeachyearintheobservedperiodthereisanegativecrelationbetweengrowthFDIinsixoutofeightyearspositivecrelationin1997insi

13、gnificantin1998.Table1alsoindicatesthatSloveniawithbyfarthesmallestshareoffeigndirectinvestmentinGDPhadaneconomicgrowthabovetheaveragealsoverystable.Thiscanbeexplainedbythemuchbetterinitialconditionsofthecountryatthebegi

14、nningoftransitiononecouldthusclaimthateconomicgrowthconvergenceofthecountrytotheEUwouldbeevenfasterwithmefeigndirectinvestment.Table1FeignDirectInvestmentGDPgrowth(countrytimeseries1994–2001)countryaverageFDIStarddeviati