[雙語翻譯]兒童家具外文翻譯--人機(jī)工程學(xué)對兒童家具情感可持續(xù)性的貢獻(xiàn)

1、2600 英文單詞， 英文單詞，13500 英文字符，中文 英文字符，中文 4450 字文獻(xiàn)出處： 文獻(xiàn)出處：Salvador C. Contributions of Ergonomics to an Affective Sustainability in Children's Furniture[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2015, 3:6483-6489.Contributions of Erg

2、onomics to an Affective Sustainability in Children’s FurnitureCristina SalvadorAbstractWithin the context of an investigation in product design, focusing on children’s furniture (high chairs), a research was made, dealin

3、g with issues as affective sustainability, leading to waste reduction and product optimization. The child is a special target, since the need of affection and support and the potential intensity of emotional bonds are hi

4、ghly present in this early stage of human development.Along with literary review, the use of Ergonomics and Human Factors as a tool, in order to observe and analyze children’s behavior towards specific types of furniture

5、 through an interview based study, may contribute to a bigger understanding of what enables an emotionalconnection between subject and object and what are their parents’ choices based on. Ergonomics may be an essential k

6、ey to this understanding, as it helps unravel how humans interact with their surroundings in a full extent, both physically and psychologically.Conclusions may not resultin a magic formula in order to create super object

7、s, which every children would want and love, but atleast gives a better understanding on how sensitive and subjective child’s attachment to objects can be and how decisive can Ergonomics be in the research process for a

8、design project.Keywords: Ergonomics and Human Factors; Product Design; Children’s Furniture; Affective Sustainability.1. IntroductionTo create a much better environment for children, adapting furniture to their needs bot

9、h physically and psychologically is the main objective of this research in product design and also to provide solutions, which enable extended product life cycles, contributing to sustainable development. The goal is a p

10、roject of a high chair following child's growth, which guarantees comfort, without being overpriced nor “disposable”.Following a study on children’s home furniture, concepts of sustainability through affection and bo

11、nding with objects were explored. An extended life cycle may not be only about the product's long lasting performance, but also about creating an object for children to bond. Product attachment is already seen as a p

12、recondition for products’ sustainability and designing pleasurable products may enable the bond between product and user [1].In order to attain this goal, it is necessary to understand more about what triggers this bondi

13、ng process and searching what kind of features may enable emotional attachment to a certain object is an important step for an optimized design project [2].Ergonomics may be an essential key to this understanding, as it

14、helps unravel how humans interact with their surroundings in a full extent, both physically and psychologically[3], namely Hedonomics, by studying pleasure in interaction [4].The use of Ergonomics and Human Factors as a

15、tool for a wider view on children’s physical and emotional reactions to a specific high chair was applied in previous studies [5],where children were the target 8. The child received the chair at what age?9. How old is t

16、he child?10. Did the child experience the chair before the acquisition?11. What was her/his first reaction?12. How was the adaptation?13. Were there any falls, instability or misuse by the child?14. Does the child identi

17、fy the chair as her/his own?15. Does she/he seems to have created emotional ties with the object?16. Does she/he complain when somebody tries to sit on the chair?17. Did she/he try to customize the chair with drawings or

18、 stickers?C. Use18. The chair is used for what kind of activities?19. How long will the child be seated during one of these activities?20. Does she/he need security systems?21. Does the child manage to sit alone?22. Does

19、 she/he have to be forced to sit?23. Is the child comfortable or complains she/he wants to get out?24. Does the child fall asleep on the chair?25. Is it easy to clean on a daily basis?D. Conclusion26. Based on the chair’

20、s performance, would you recommend it?27. In case it is an evolutive chair (that follows child’s growth), do you intend to keep it?28. In case it is not an evolutive chair, after the child is 2-3 years old, do you intend

21、 to replace it by a chair for adults?29. Do you have any further comments about the chair?2.2. ResultsResults of the interviews are summarized in 4 tables: Table 2 with results about the parent’s choice and acquisitio

22、n, problems identified and appreciation in terms of efficiency; Table 3 with results about the children’s emotional response to the product; Table 4 with the results about the children’s use of the product; Table 5 with

23、results about parents’ satisfaction and intentions for the product’s future.The sample of 26 high chairs for children was evenly divided between two types of chairs – the chairs that can follow child’s growth until adult

24、hood and the ones that can’t. Tripp Trapp£ chair from Stokke£, designed by Peter Opsvik, whose work deserved further research in previous studies by the author[12], represents 50% of the sample. Polly chair fro

25、m Chicco£ represents 38,5% and Antilop chair from IKEA£ represents the remaining 11,5% of the sample. The acquisition is mostly in 1st hand and the features or factors that influenced the choice are variable. P

26、arents who choose Tripp Trapp£ chairs are more concerned with durability, classic timeless design, quality, brand, safety and ecology in what seems to be a more sustainable product. Images, from each model in their

27、users home, can be seen in Fig.1 (a,b and c).For Polly chairs owners, also the quality and brand are important but ergonomics and comfort, decoration and availability are big concerns. Described by the producer as evolut