2023年全國碩士研究生考試考研英語一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁
已閱讀1頁,還剩8頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、2150 英文 英文單詞, 單詞,12500 英文字符, 英文字符,4150 漢字 漢字出處: 出處:Horowitz A, Goodman C R, Reinhardt J P. Congruence between disabled elders and their primary caregivers.[J]. 2004, 44(4):532-542.Congruence Between Disabled Elders and T

2、heir Primary CaregiversAmy Horowitz, Caryn R. Goodman, and Joann P. ReinhardtPurpose: This study examines the extent and independent correlates of congruence between disabled elders and their caregivers on several aspect

3、s of the caregiving experience. Design and Methods: Participants were 117 visually impaired elders and their caregivers. Correlational analyses, kappa statistics, and paired t tests were used to examine the extent of con

4、gruence. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses identified significant correlates of congruence on four target issues: elder’s functional disability, elder’s adaptation to vision impairment, caregiver’s over-protectiv

5、eness, and caregiver’s understanding of the vision problem. Results: Caregivers assessed elders as more disabled and rated themselves as more overprotective than did the elders. Although independent correlates varied by

6、target issue, two domains most consistently influenced congruence across measures: the caregiver’s assessment of the elder’s status and quality of the relationship. Implications: Findings underscore the importance of add

7、ressing congruence by target issue, rather than as a global characteristic of the caregiving relationship.Key Words: Family caregiving, Vision impairment, Caregiving relationships, Disability, ProxyCongruence may be de

8、fined as the level of agreement between two or more individuals in their perceptions, assessments, or beliefs. Many investigators have suggested that congruence (also referred to as consensus, shared relational reality,

9、or shared meaning), within marital and other close relation- ships, is critically important in maintaining relational quality (Acitelli, 1996; Deal, Wampler, Duck, 1994). For older, disabled adults, one of their most im

10、portant relationships, if not the most important, is that with the family member or friend who serves as their primary caregiver. However, because of the many emotional and physical demands associated with caregiving, fo

11、r both the caregiver and the care recipient, it is also a relationship that is often fraught with stress and susceptible to conflict. A lack of congruence on fundamental components of the caregiving experience may be a m

12、ajor contributor to this stress. Thus, knowledge about the extent of discrepant perspectives can provide important in- formation to better understand variability in the caregiving experience for both the caregiver and ca

13、re receiver. Given the assumption that no absolute truth exists, it then becomes important to understand such differences by identifying factors that increase or decrease the potential for congruence (Burke et al., 1998)

14、. Furthermore, knowledge about the source of incongruence is important in order to understand its psychological and social meaning in the relationship (Acitelli, 1996).Although congruence is a concept relevant to a varie

15、ty of issues in caregiving, there has been surprisingly little research that examines questions about the extent and correlates of congruence between older people and their primary caregivers. Furthermore, in addition to

16、 helping one to better understand the caregiving relationship, congruence, or the lack thereof, can also have important implications for the quality of the caregiving relationship, and ultimate well-being of both dyad me

17、mbers. For example, it has been found that congruence Truax, 1994).Fewer studies on congruence have focused on other aspects of the caregiving experience. Symptom distress was examined by Maguire, Walsh, Jeacock, and Kin

18、gston (1999) among terminally ill elders and their families, and by Kristjanson and colleagues (1998) among physically ill elders. Both studies found that the degree of congruence varied by symptom. Similar to patterns i

19、n ADL congruence, Kristjanson and colleagues found that families tended to report greater symptom distress than did the elder. Higher ratings were associated with increased caregiver age, living separately, and caring fo

20、r a male. Chappell and Kuehne (1998) examined congruence on positive affect and caregiving meaning among older couples and found higher congruence on the former than the latter. High positive affect congruence was more l

21、ikely when the caregiver was the husband, older, in better health, received more help from family and friends, and when both dyad members reported satisfaction with the relationship and higher life satisfaction. However,

22、 congruence on the meaning of caregiving was only associated with caregivers’ reports of higher relationship and life satisfaction. Lyons and colleagues (2002) found a lack of congruence in the level of caregiving diffic

23、ulties reported by elders and care- givers. Greater incongruence on this measure was predicted by caregiver reports of higher levels of caregiving difficulties and greater relationship strain.In summary, although prio

24、r research indicates that congruence may be influenced by a variety of factors, there has been little consistency in these factors either across studies or across measures (Bond Carabellese et al., 1993; Crews Horowitz

25、 Reuben, Silbey, Damesyn, Salive et al., 1994; Wahl, Oswald, West et al., 2002). There is also ample evidence that families exhibit significant distress when an older relative becomes visually disabled (Crews Dumas

26、Goodman Horowitz et al., 1998; Reinhardt & D’Allura, 2000).Third, in addition to examining congruence on the elders’ functional disability, we also examine congruence on several other, more subjective aspects of the

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論