版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、2300 英文單詞, 英文單詞,12400 英文字符,中文 英文字符,中文 3650 字 文獻(xiàn)出處: 文獻(xiàn)出處:Dobre F, Brad L, Ciobanu R, et al. Management Performance Audit in Mergers and Acquisitions ☆[J]. Procedia Economics & Finance, 2012, 3(1):309-314.Management pe
2、rformance audit in mergers and acquisitionsFlorin Dobre, Laura Brad , Radu Ciobanu , Eugeniu Turlea , Florentin CaloianAbstractSeveral rapid changes had taken placed in companies involved in a M&A process, especially
3、 when managerial practices are encountered. Consequently, the management performance audit is an efficient analysed tool that quantifies how the economic resources were used by shareholders. While the number of M&A h
4、as increased constantly, expect the financial crisis period, not a proper documentation about the link between the M&A process and the managerial audit could be found. The aim of this paper is to examine if corporate
5、 takeovers lead to an increase in firm performance and whether the company manager has an important role. By auditing the manager’s performance we can establish if he took the best decisions in order to increase the shar
6、eholders wealth and if he put their wiling’s into practice. The managers performance can be measured either by quantitative or by qualitative variables. Our study aims to establish if there is a post-takeover long-term p
7、erformance for the companies supposed to a merger and acquisition process. The results indicate an improvement of financial indicators, as the impact of managerial audit performance cannot be denied.Keywords: takeover, M
8、anagement performance audit, Acquisitions, Accounting, firm performance1. IntroductionRecent studies try to find out if acquisitions and takeovers provide real benefits for the target firms. As a fact, this research poin
9、ts out if acquisitions and takeovers can improve a company performance and, if the managers have something to do with the performance incensement or if the increased post-takeover performance is only due to its correlati
10、on to the market. Secondly, the key determinants for this post takeover performance were tested using a classical regression model and a panel data one.Most merger and acquisition M&A studies have examined only the s
11、hort-term market reaction to mergers and acquisitions announcements. This study examines the long-term operating performance, taking into consideration only the successful acquisitions and takeovers, leaving behind the t
12、ender offers that were only a simple intention.2. Literature reviewMost of the recent studies examine only the post-takeover performance regardless of the manager's contribution in obtaining those. For instance, Mage
13、nheim and Mueller 1988 examined the longer-term market reaction over a 60-month period after the acquisition and concluded that target firms performance is deteriorated. As a consequence, the gains of the target sharehol
14、ders were only a simple transfer of wealth from the shareholders of the acquiring firm.In another study, Healy, Palepu and Ruback 1992 examined post-merger performance using the operating cash flow return for 50 target a
15、nd acquirer firms in years surrounding the M&A transaction, completed between 1979 to mid-1984. The authors found out that the firms involved have significant improvements in post-merger asset productivity and moreov
16、er, there are significant differences in performance as it is affected by the industry where the company acts. Consequently, the industry sector was included in our study in order to determine if this can be a The indica
17、tor “different president from CEO”, took 1 if the difference was obvious, otherwise it took 0, while the second dummy variable was quantify as follow: 1 if the company is acting in the industry area and 0 if it is acting
18、 in the service area.Not only the financial indicators are important, but also the sample which we used in order to establish the individual influences and the collectivity one of financial indicators as our dependent va
19、riable was considered the return on equity.The data was collected from 25 companies that were supposed to a takeover process from 2005-2011 from the Romania Market. The data collected was extracted from company’s financi
20、als’ statements not only for the period when the process took place, but also for the previous one. The purpose was to identify if the takeover process has a positive or a negative influence upon the profitability of the
21、 company.This table presents the descriptive statistics for the variable used in the model. The database consists of a number of 25 companies that were the subject of a takeover bid. These were all the takeover transacti
22、on from the Romanian capital market between 2005 and 2011 that ended with a change in the control of that company. Most of these companies are relatively small and are highly influenced by market. Also they are tradable
23、only on the RASDAQ market and are characterized by lack of liquidity and this can explain the abnormal high or low values of some variables.For our panel model, a three year time period was used, one before and one after
24、 the takeover process. Both models used a linear relationship between the total equity of the company and the independent variables, but they differ when the interpretation is encounter.0 pt Here introduce the paper, and
25、 put a nomenclature if necessary, in a box with the same font size as the rest of the paper. The paragraphs continue from here and are only separated by headings, subheadings, images and formulae. The section headings ar
26、e arranged by numbers, bold and 10 pt. Here follows further instructions for authors.4. Results and interpretationThe results of our research were divided in two sections as two different models were provided. The first
27、one is a classical regression model and its characteristics are summarized in the following equation:Due to the elements incorporated above, we can realize an economical interpretation. As a fact, the increasing of turn
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語翻譯]企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--企業(yè)并購中的管理績效審計(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--企業(yè)并購中的管理績效審計中英全
- 2012年企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--企業(yè)并購中的管理績效審計
- 2012年企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--企業(yè)并購中的管理績效審計.DOCX
- 2012年企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--企業(yè)并購中的管理績效審計(英文).PDF
- [雙語翻譯]企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--并購過程中變更的有效管理
- [雙語翻譯]企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--并購過程中變更的有效管理(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--并購過程中變更的有效管理中英全
- 2014年企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--并購過程中變更的有效管理
- 2014年企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--并購過程中變更的有效管理.DOCX
- 外文翻譯----企業(yè)并購財務(wù)分析
- [雙語翻譯]跨國并購?fù)馕姆g--跨境并購和違約風(fēng)險(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]跨國并購?fù)馕姆g--跨境并購和違約風(fēng)險(節(jié)選)
- 2014年企業(yè)并購?fù)馕姆g--并購過程中變更的有效管理(英文).PDF
- 外文翻譯---企業(yè)并購財務(wù)問題分析
- [雙語翻譯]跨國并購?fù)馕姆g--跨境并購和違約風(fēng)險中英全
- [雙語翻譯]跨國并購?fù)馕姆g--探索影響跨國并購談判過程的因素(節(jié)選)
- [雙語翻譯]跨國并購?fù)馕姆g--探索影響跨國并購談判過程的因素(英文)
- 外文翻譯-- 企業(yè)并購財務(wù)報表分析
- 大學(xué)生文獻(xiàn)企業(yè)并購管理績效審計
評論
0/150
提交評論