2023年全國(guó)碩士研究生考試考研英語(yǔ)一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁(yè)
已閱讀1頁(yè),還剩58頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、廣西師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文研究生學(xué)術(shù)誠(chéng)信問(wèn)題的博弈分析姓名:朱月晨申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專(zhuān)業(yè):馬克思主義理論與思想政治教育指導(dǎo)教師:楊乃良20060401研究生學(xué)術(shù)誠(chéng)信問(wèn)題的博弈分析 The game analysis of postgraduate academic integrityIIAbstractThe academic integrity of the current graduate students conducted a s

2、urvey study,recognizing that thepost- graduate Academic credit exist,and cited deficiencies in the integrity of the academic status of graduatestudents, such as forged experimental data, copied others academic results,fa

3、bricate references, examinationfraud,papers signed exchange,as gunmen. This article describes in detail the findings and the basis of publicinformation, confirmed the existence of postgraduate academic integrity deficien

4、cies. This phenomenon affectsthe quality of postgraduate training,hindering their academic road development; Impact of the social functionof a university, the University community confidence gradually reduced,and increas

5、ed social deterioration.It always exist internal causes in reality. This article is based on rational assumptions of postgraduatelimited basis,the use of game theory “ prisoners dilemma”and repeat the game some perspecti

6、ve,a model foranalysis. Postgraduate Academic credit is a transition period of social factors. When graduate students face“ prisoners dilemma” , the impact of its academic choice “ not honest”reasons attributed to the th

7、ree categories:First, social macro- environment,with postgraduate academic acts have direct contact with social factors, suchas social integrity of cultural, academic journals, employment opportunities, reflected in the

8、graduate andacademic periodicals exchange between the interests of the game,in the employment of resources to capturethe game,and cultural integrity of the mutual influence the game;Second,under colleges and universities

9、environment,graduate students in colleges and universities and post- graduate academic evaluation systembetween instructors and psychological game,although academic performance and evaluation indicators forpostgraduate b

10、argaining game with the academic integrity of educators copied game;Third,Graduate groupsatmosphere blind comparison of academic results and academic integrity among graduate academic integrityof misconduct is also anoth

11、er reason for the formation of strategic deficiencies.In view of this,this should be raised for the building of systems from three to solve this problem. Socialenvironment,it is necessary to purify the atmosphere and cre

12、ate a universal moral integrity of the academicintegrity and standardize the current academic journals improper market behavior; Colleges and universities inthe circumstances, should improve existing postgraduate trainin

13、g system, a graduate student living professors,graduate students strengthen the integrity of education to firmly establish the concept of integrity,theestablishment of an effective academic evaluation mechanisms,and the

14、academic community to the internaland external oversight of postgraduate tutors;Graduate groups within postgraduate training within theacademic community should strengthen self- discipline academic integrity.The adoption

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論