貨運(yùn)代理人法律地位之研究.pdf

1、Y95050後旦大擎碩士學(xué)位論文(專業(yè)學(xué)位)學(xué)校代碼：10246學(xué)號：033027]29貨運(yùn)代理人法律地位之研究院系(所)：專業(yè)：姓名：指導(dǎo)教師：完成日期：法學(xué)院法律碩士汪洋陳治東教授2005年10月18日貨運(yùn)代理人法律地付之研究ABSTRACTThisarticleisconsistedoffourchapterswhichisabstractedasfollowsThefirstchapterexpoundstheintension

2、andextensionoftheconceptofthefreightforwarderBycitingandanalyzingsomedefinitions，theauthorleadSsometermsaboutfreightforwarderandhiscomplicatedlegalstatusTheauthorexplainsthatthearticleuseCOI衄lOntermof“freightforwarder”，a

3、ndthendefinesthecoverageofthisarticle，namelytheinternationaloceanfreightforwarderChaptertwostudiesthelegalstatusoffreightforwarderAfreightforwardermaybethemandatoryofcargo’sowner(agent)、thecarrier、themultimodaltransporto

4、peratorandthethirdpartylogisticsoperatorThehistoryofthechangeoftheselegalstatusesisalsothehistoryofdevelopmentoffreightforwarder’SbusinessInaddition，afreightforwardermaybetheintermediary。carrier’scommissionistheremunerat

5、ionofhisintermediationLastly，afreightforwardermaybethemandatoryofcarrier(agent)Thestandardsofdistinguishingthemandatoryofcargo’sownerfromthecarrierinclude：first，theclauseofcontract，secondly，theactionoffreightforwarder，th

6、irdly，thecontentofoceanbilloflading，fourthly，thepatternofcollectingfeesbythefreightforwarder，andfifthly，thetransactionhistorybetweenthefreightforwarderandhiscounterpartChapterthreeexplorestherightsandobligationsofafreigh

7、tforwarderwhenheactsasthemandatoryofcargo’SownerThischapteristhekeypartofthearticleInjudicialpracticeofChina，thecontractforfreightforwardinghasbeendeemedasakindofnongratuitouscontractforcommissionUndertheagencytheoryofCh

8、inaaswellasthecontinentallawsystemmandateandauthorityisstrictlyseparated，agencyisconfinedwithinjuristicactThelegislatureoftheContractLawofChinahasdrawnlessonsfromunnamedagencybutdisclosedprincipaltheoryofthecommonlawsyst