徘徊在人權(quán)和維穩(wěn)之間-避免刑訊逼供行為及其法律規(guī)制.pdf

1、原 創(chuàng) 性 聲 明本人鄭重聲明： 本人所呈交的學(xué)位論文， 是在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下獨(dú)立進(jìn)行研究所 取得的成果。學(xué)位論文中凡引用他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或未發(fā)表的成果、數(shù)據(jù)、觀點(diǎn)等，均已明確注明出處。 除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外， 不包含任何其他個人或集體 已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的科研成果。對本文的研究成果做出重要貢獻(xiàn)的個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標(biāo)明。本聲明的法律責(zé)任由本人承擔(dān)。關(guān)于學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)的聲明本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下所完成的論文及相關(guān)的職務(wù)作品，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)

2、歸屬蘭州大 學(xué) 。 本人完全了解蘭州大學(xué)有關(guān)保存、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，同意學(xué)校保存或向 國家有關(guān)部門或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的紙質(zhì)版和電子版， 允許論文被查閱和借閱； 本人 授權(quán)蘭州大學(xué)可以將本學(xué)位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進(jìn)行檢索， 可 以采用任何復(fù)制手段保存和匯編本學(xué)位論文。 本人離校后發(fā)表、 使用學(xué)位論文或 與該論文直接相關(guān)的學(xué)術(shù)論文或成果時，第一署名單位仍然為蘭州大學(xué)。本學(xué)位論文研究內(nèi)容：□可以公開□不宜公開，已在學(xué)位辦公室辦理保

3、密申請，解密后適用本授權(quán)書。(請在以上選項內(nèi)選擇其中一項打“ V”）論文作者簽名：___________________ 導(dǎo)師簽名:日期: 期:Between human rights and maintenance ~ avoid behavior and the legal regulation of torture to extract confessions AbstractExtorting a confession

4、 by torture is a serious violation of the human rights of the ugly phenomenon, in the long period of slave society and feudal society, extorting a confession by torture is a very common means of evidence and such behavio

5、r is legal. With the development of social civilization and progress, and the advent of the bourgeois revolution in Europe， the majority of Enlightenment thinkers to the cruel torture as a typical representative of the

6、medieval cruel punishment, severe criticism.In our country, extorting a confession by torture exist for thousands of years. It is not only a serious violation of human rights. But also damaged the reputation of the judic

7、iary, extorting a confession by torture has become a historical ills， in judicial practice is banned repeatedly more than in 1949 new China established since gradually adopt a variety of forbidding extorting a confession

8、 by torture, illegal detention of legislative and judicial measures. At the same time in China on December 12, 1986 signed hereinafter referred to as < the UN Convention against torture. Its purpose is on, extorting

9、confessions by torture, effective regulation. But in the judicial practice every year appear torture For the case, the startling typical cases, a serious violation of the criminal suspect, the defendant's rights of

10、 the person and destroys the credibility of the judiciary and the majority of citizens reverence for the law.In order to further improve China's rule of law and protecting human rights, effective regulation of ext

11、orting a confession by torture. The in this paper purposed: basis of extorting a confession by torture, characteristics， review the history and the present situation and the legal regulations of the history, in-depth re

12、flection on legislation and judicial exploration and on the regulation of torture torture in legislation, justice as a useful summary and exploration.Key words: Torture to extract confessions, compulsory measures, the pr