國(guó)際民事訴訟管轄中的不方便法院原則——以英美法為借鑒.pdf

1、學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明：所提交的學(xué)位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作和取得的研究成果。本論文中除引文外，所有實(shí)驗(yàn)、數(shù)據(jù)和有關(guān)材料均是真實(shí)的。本論文中除引文和致謝的內(nèi)容外，不包含其他人或其它機(jī)構(gòu)已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過(guò)的研究成果。其他同志對(duì)本研究所做的貢獻(xiàn)均己在論文中作了聲明并表示了謝意。學(xué)位論文作者繇套盔鷴隰j月諺9學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)聲明研究生在校攻讀學(xué)位期間論文工作的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)單位屬南京師范大學(xué)。學(xué)校有權(quán)保存本學(xué)位論文的電子和紙質(zhì)文檔

2、，可以借閱或上網(wǎng)公布本學(xué)位論文的部分或全部?jī)?nèi)容，可以采用影印、復(fù)印等手段保存、匯編本學(xué)位論文。學(xué)?？梢韵驀?guó)家有關(guān)機(jī)關(guān)或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的電子和紙質(zhì)文檔，允許論文被查閱和借閱。(保密論文在解密后遵守此規(guī)定)保密論文注釋：本學(xué)位論文屬于保密論文，密級(jí)：以前保密期限為年。學(xué)位論文作者躲锨通融日期：5炱硼佩導(dǎo)教師簽名：嗜藏日期：fA諸鹼AbstractWiththedeepeningdevelopmentofintemationalciviland

3、commercialexchanges，thetypeandamountoftransnationalcivilandcommerciallitigationaresignificantlyincreasinginrecentyearsDuetothecomplexityandparticularityoftransnationalcivilandcommerciallitigationcountriesaretryingtoexerc

4、iseofitsowncourtofjurisdictionoverforeignrelatedcivilandcommercialcasesreasonablyinthelegislationandjudicialpracticeOnonehand，countriesinlegislationdefmesabroadjurisdictionoverforeignrelatedcivilandcommercialcases；ontheo

5、therhand1egislationandjurisdictionofthepartiesistoogeneral，andusuallyresuksinforumshopping，whichinrealitybroughtheavyworkburdenfortheappellatecourt，andevenworkinsurmountableobstaclesUnderthisbackground，theinternationalci

6、viljurisdiction，theinconvenientcourtprincipleisincreasinglybecominganindispensableimportantsystemInconvenientcourtprincipleoriginatedinAngloAmericanlawsystemandinthoseAngloAmericanlawsystemcountries，thetheoryisrelatively

7、matureSincetheendofthe20thcenturytherehavebeenalotofcasesintermsofinconvenientcourttheorywhichhavecontributedtotheforeigncasesjurisdictionInthispaperonthebasisofintroductionofinconvenientcourtprincipleapplicablecondition

8、s，pattemofbothBritainandAmericaniudicialpractice，theauthorfurtheranalyzedhowtoperfecttheinconvenientcourtprincipleinChina，andhowtoprovideChinesecourtswithguidelinestoestablishreasonablejurisdictionoverforeignrelatedcivil

9、andcommercialcasesMypaperisdividedintothreeparts：Thefirstpartfirstlysummarizesthedefinitionandoriginoftheinconvenientcourtprinciple，andflLrtheranalyzesthevalueandutilityoftheinconvenientcourtprincipleSpecificallytheautho

10、ranalyzesthereasonswhytheinconvenientcourtprincipleiswidelyacceptedworldwide：orleistopreventthose”forumshopping”thatmaybringnegativeeffects；thesecondiSteleasethenegativeeffectsofoverlybroad“l(fā)egislativejurisdiction’indome

11、sticlegislation，namelythe“l(fā)ongarmjurisdiction”，whichusuallybroughtexcessiveburdenfordomesticcourtsThesecondpartbasedontheintroductionoftheAngloAmericanlegislationandjudicialpractice，makesadeepanalysisonthetheoryoftheAngl