mba論文論民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)pdf

1、 論民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán) 內(nèi)容摘要 我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)抗訴中的調(diào)查權(quán)一直以來(lái)備受關(guān)注，在檢察實(shí)務(wù)部門和審判實(shí)務(wù)部門之間也存在不同的認(rèn)識(shí)和看法。為了強(qiáng)化對(duì)民事審判活動(dòng)的監(jiān)督，2012 年修改的《民事訴訟法》明確規(guī)定，檢察機(jī)關(guān)在履行法律監(jiān)督職責(zé)時(shí)，因提出檢察建議或者抗訴的需要，對(duì)當(dāng)事人或者案外人可以進(jìn)行有關(guān)情況的調(diào)查。但是，對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)履行抗訴職責(zé)時(shí)行使調(diào)查權(quán)的原則、方式、范圍、保障、程序等，依然沒有明確規(guī)定。筆者認(rèn)為，在新法適用的過(guò)程中，為更好地利用法

2、律賦予的職權(quán)強(qiáng)化法律監(jiān)督的目的，有必要對(duì)民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)制度的框架進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步完善，進(jìn)而形成一套具有操作性和規(guī)范化的抗訴調(diào)查機(jī)制。 本文正文圍繞民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)制度，從四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述：首先從民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)的概念性質(zhì)入手，通過(guò)定義和法律屬性來(lái)理解民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)的概念，確定抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)的性質(zhì)是檢察權(quán)的一項(xiàng)權(quán)能，是實(shí)現(xiàn)法律監(jiān)督的手段；并有針對(duì)性地將民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)與檢察權(quán)、 偵查權(quán)、 初查權(quán)進(jìn)行比較。在分析我國(guó)法律監(jiān)督文化背景和檢察制度建立背景的基礎(chǔ)

3、上，理清民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)的思想根源和制度根源分別是國(guó)家right of investigation of protest duty principle, method, scope, procedures, security, is still not clearly defined. The author believes that, in the process of the law applicable, to make bett

4、er use of legal powers to strengthen legal supervision purposes, it is necessary to investigate the right of civil protest system framework was further improved, and the formation of a set of investigation mechanism of

5、 operation and specification of protest. This text is on the right of civil protest survey, from four aspects: first, starting from the concept of property right of civil protest investigation, by defining concepts and

6、legal attributes to understand the right to protest investigation to determine the nature of the right of civil protest, the investigation is a right of the procuratorial power can, is the realization of legal supervisi

7、on means; and to compare the system of civil protest investigation power and procuratorial power, investigation power, right. In the analysis of legal supervision in China cultural background and procuratorial system w

8、as established on the basis of the background, ideological roots and the root system of civil protest rights clear investigation are nationalism and Soviet civil procuratorial system. Combined with the current scholars

9、affirmed doctrine, to protest the investigation rights civil denial theory and the doctrine of the mean theory viewpoint and the reasons, the author views in favor of the doctrine of the mean, and the actual evaluation f

10、rom the legal and. According to the technical defects existing in current legislation, the content is imperfect and contradictory situation and judicial practice of procuratorial organs using the power of randomness and

11、procedures are not standardized and the court with limited difficulties and judicial interpretation, the author will handle the case by analyzing the form of empirical investigation means, use summary procuratorial prac

12、tice the relatively high frequency case situation, and study the use of the merits of the case investigation, in order to find out the weakness of the system. Finally, according to the author's own work, with the co

13、ncept of location survey of civil protest rights as the breakthrough point, suggestions on correction in accordance with law concept, legal, reasonable, fair, public, the principle of the dialectical unity in the exerci

14、se of rights clear grasp, survey scope, security mechanism, restriction mechanism and start the program, from static to dynamic, macro to micro multi orientation, multi angle to construct and perfect the system. Keyword