版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、Journalism1 –16 © The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1464884915576731 jou.sagepub.comIs there still a ‘crisis in public communication’ (if there ever
2、was one)? The UK experienceIvor Gaber University of Sussex, UKAbstract This article takes a considered look at the debates surrounding the notion of ‘the crisis in political communications’ as it applies, in particular,
3、 to the United Kingdom. The article begins by seeking to make the Habermasian notion of the public sphere relevant to contemporary political communications in the United Kingdom. It then goes on to detail the evolutio
4、n of the argument that there is a crisis, by tracing it, mainly but not exclusively, through the works of Jay Blumler and his collaborators. It places these arguments within the context of the changes in the relations
5、between politicians and the media as set out by both scholars and through the author’s reflections on his own professional practice. The article suggests that despite what some have described as a deterioration in the
6、 political communications system, the dramatic changes that have been, and are, taking place in the increasingly digital public sphere, an argument can be sustained that we are moving into a period when, because the pu
7、blic (or its online component) have greater access to political information and debate, the crisis, if it ever existed in the first place, is passing and we are now moving towards an enhanced and healthier digital publ
8、ic sphere.Keywords Digital revolution, political communications, politicians and media, public sphere, social media, spin and democratic debateIntroduction: The public sphere reconsideredAny discussion about a ‘crisis’
9、in political or public communications must, either implic- itly or explicitly, take as a starting point Jürgen Habermas’ (1989) notion of the public Corresponding author: Ivor Gaber, Department of Media and Film, Un
10、iversity of Sussex, Silverstone Room 204, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK. Email: ivor.gaber@sussex.ac.uk576731 JOU0010.1177/1464884915576731JournalismGaber research-article2015Articleat China Jiliang University on May 28, 2016 j
11、ou.sagepub.com Downloaded from Gaber 3If the answer is yes, then a further question is begged – namely, is the crisis more or less fixed in nature or is it dynamic and, in normative terms, can the direction of travel b
12、e seen as positive or negative? Or was there never a crisis in the first place? There are a number of electronic straws in the wind suggestive of the possibility that contemporary political communications are in the pr
13、ocess of changing, or appearing to change, what Gans (2010) has termed the ‘democratic conversation’, and that this trans- formation is not necessarily for the worse.Blumler’s developing ‘crisis in public communication’
14、In considering the health of the political public sphere, I am focussing on the central relationship within that sphere, namely, that between journalists and politicians. One of the key texts in this area is Blumler an
15、d Gurevitch (1995) who were among the pioneers of a systemic approach to the study of political communications and were among the first to identify the ‘Crisis of Public Communication’, based on their almost 30 years o
16、f observing election coverage at the BBC between 1966 and 1992. When Blumler first began researching election coverage in the United Kingdom, he did not perceive it to be in ‘crisis’. In one of his first studies Bluml
17、er and McQuail (1968) concluded that the political communications system in the United Kingdom, as they observed it during the 1964 election in the United Kingdom, was functioning well, giving the maximum num- ber of c
18、itizens the chance to be exposed to the views of the main political parties (p. 286). And when Blumler and Gurevitch looked at political communications in the elections of 1983 in the United Kingdom and 1984 in the Uni
19、ted States (Semetko et al., 1991), they compared Britain favourably, noting that in the UK election, coverage was less game- orientated, more substantive, gave politicians more scope to set the campaign agenda, less pr
20、ofessionalised and that British journalists’ attitude to politicians was more ‘sacer- dotal’ than ‘disdainful’ – their two principle descriptors. They attributed these positive attributes largely to the existence of a s
21、izeable public service broadcasting sector in the United Kingdom which was imbued with what they described as a ‘civic mission’ (Semetko et al. 1991). However, in the light of their later observations at the BBC, they
22、subsequently revised their verdict on the British system, charting a declining public service broadcasting ethos which they held as being largely responsible for what they were now calling a ‘crisis’ in public communi
23、cation. They observed that journalists (not just in the BBC) were becom- ing ever more ‘disdainful’ of politicians in their election coverage. They suggested that journalists viewed politicians and parties through an in
24、creasingly cynical lens and saw election coverage more and more in terms of a contest – not between the politicians but between the politicians and the media. In this contest, the journalists first sought to decode ho
25、w the politicians were attempting to gain control of the daily election news agenda and then were seeking to devise strategies as to how to nullify such manoeuvres (Blumler and Gurevitch, 1995: 104). This approach they
26、 contrasted with what they had described earlier as a more ‘sacerdotal’ approach to election coverage – the notion that journalists, particularly public service broadcasters, assumed that they had an obligation to pro
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語翻譯]--新聞媒體外文翻譯--大眾傳媒中還存在危機嗎(如果曾經(jīng)存在危機)?以英國為例(節(jié)選)
- [雙語翻譯]--新聞媒體外文翻譯--大眾傳媒中還存在危機嗎(如果曾經(jīng)存在危機)?以英國為例中英全
- 2016年--新聞媒體外文翻譯--大眾傳媒中還存在危機嗎(如果曾經(jīng)存在危機)?以英國為例
- 2016年--新聞媒體外文翻譯--大眾傳媒中還存在危機嗎(如果曾經(jīng)存在危機)?以英國為例(原文).PDF
- 2016年--新聞媒體外文翻譯--大眾傳媒中還存在危機嗎(如果曾經(jīng)存在危機)?以英國為例(節(jié)選).DOCX
- 危機事件中的大眾傳媒.pdf
- [雙語翻譯]--外文翻譯--新聞行業(yè)危機的構建
- 新聞媒體外文文獻翻譯
- 大眾傳媒時代的文學存在
- 政府危機管理中的大眾傳媒輿論引導研究.pdf
- 新媒體外文翻譯—新媒體對尼日利亞新聞媒體監(jiān)督作用的影響(原文)
- 2014年--外文翻譯--新聞行業(yè)危機的構建(原文).pdf
- 大眾傳媒危機預警的困境及對策研究.pdf
- 政府危機管理中大眾傳媒的作用研究.pdf
- 我國大眾傳媒與政府危機傳播研究——以2003年SARS疫情報道為例.pdf
- 危機傳播中新聞媒體的傳播力提升
- [雙語翻譯]新聞傳播學專業(yè)外文翻譯—將隱私納入其中在危機管理中使用社交媒體的考慮因素(原文)
- [雙語翻譯]--股票外文翻譯--股市與消費以中國為例(原文)
- 危機傳播中新聞媒體的傳播力提升.pdf
- 大眾傳媒功能失范對危機決策的影響研究.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論