版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、本科畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)(論文)外 文 翻 譯原文: 原文:Dining experience , foodservices and staffing are associated with quality of life in elderly nursing home residentsIntroductionAlthough today’s nursing home residents are more functionally and
2、cognitively impaired than they were 20 years ago (1-5), nursing homes still aim to preserve and promote good quality of life for their residents, however challenging this may be. While both physical and social environme
3、ntal factors, such as level of recreational activities and control over physical environment, have frequently been included in determinants of quality of life among frail elderly people (6-8), very few studies have deter
4、mined whether institutional factors, such as food and nutritional services and dining experience, are associated with quality of life in LTC. Several other factors have already been identified as contributing to the qua
5、lity of life of the elderly in health care institutions. For example, chronic conditions, drug consumption, functional abilities, swallowing difficulties, and nutritional status have all been linked to their quality of l
6、ife (9-12). Risk of malnutrition has also been found to be associated with quality of life in older adults (10,13,14). Winzelberg et al. (9) observed a significant correlation between residents’ quality of life scores an
7、d their mental health status (i.e., severity of cognitive dysfunction and depression).The American Dietetic Association put forward a position paper on nutrition and aging which stipulates that, along with environmental
8、factors, the enjoyment of food and nutritional well-being play a key part in an older adult’s quality of life (1). The psychological and social aspects surrounding mealtime can impact on elderly residents’ quality of lif
9、e by influencing the pleasure of eating. Mealtimes tend to give residents a sense of security, belonging, structure and order to their day. They can also impaired residents, it did have acceptable reliability for use wit
10、h cognitively intact residents. For cognitively impaired residents, reliability results for all three subscales were quite similar between Sloane et al.’s (31) study and ours ( = .57 to .79). Unfortunately, Sloane etal.
11、(34) did not report on the reliability of the combined QOL-D scale. Mean scores for QOL-D and its subscales were significantly higher in cognitively intact residents, which reflected their higher quality of life, espe
12、cially in terms of activity levels. Two previous studies found that quality of life decreases with increasing level of cognitive impairment (9,11); however, Winzelberg et al. (9) used a modified version of the Logsdon et
13、 al.’s (35) Quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease scale (QOL-AD) in their study, while Kerner et al. (11) used the Quality of Well-Being (QWB) Scale. Health and Socio-DemographicsOver two-thirds of the residents in this s
14、tudy were cognitively impaired, which is similar to percentages found by other studies with institutionalized elderly (3, 36). A significantly larger percentage of cognitively impaired residents compared to cognitively i
15、ntact residents had a BMI lower than 20 (26.8% vs 9.1%). Other studies in LTC settings have also shown that residents with dementia-related disorders are more prone to weight loss and malnutrition (3, 36). Length of stay
16、 was not significantly associated with quality of life in either cognitively intact or impaired residents, but an increase in the number of medical conditions was negatively associated with quality of life in cognitively
17、 intact residents. There was no significant difference in types of conditions reported for cognitively intact versus impaired residents. This is somewhat surprising since different conditions should have lead to the in
18、stitutionalization of both groups of residents. In addition, Kempen et al. (12) also found that chronic medical conditions were negatively associated with quality of life in cognitively intact older adults in both commun
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 影響?zhàn)B老機(jī)構(gòu)與社區(qū)養(yǎng)老中老年人生活滿意度的因素分析
- 城市老年人口中社區(qū)養(yǎng)老和機(jī)構(gòu)養(yǎng)老間的轉(zhuǎn)換【外文翻譯】
- 外文翻譯---城市老年人口中社區(qū)養(yǎng)老和機(jī)構(gòu)養(yǎng)老間的轉(zhuǎn)換(英文)
- 外文翻譯---城市老年人口中社區(qū)養(yǎng)老和機(jī)構(gòu)養(yǎng)老間的轉(zhuǎn)換(節(jié)選)
- 外文翻譯----城市老年人口中社區(qū)養(yǎng)老和機(jī)構(gòu)養(yǎng)老間的轉(zhuǎn)換(節(jié)選)
- 外文翻譯---城市老年人口中社區(qū)養(yǎng)老和機(jī)構(gòu)養(yǎng)老間的轉(zhuǎn)換.doc
- 外文翻譯---城市老年人口中社區(qū)養(yǎng)老和機(jī)構(gòu)養(yǎng)老間的轉(zhuǎn)換(節(jié)選)
- 外文翻譯---城市老年人口中社區(qū)養(yǎng)老和機(jī)構(gòu)養(yǎng)老間的轉(zhuǎn)換.doc
- 社區(qū)居家養(yǎng)老中老年人照顧者的弱能探究.pdf
- 養(yǎng)老機(jī)構(gòu)內(nèi)老年護(hù)理專業(yè)人員核心能力框架的研究.pdf
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]養(yǎng)老金外文翻譯--養(yǎng)老金的未來(lái)和老年人對(duì)社會(huì)的貢獻(xiàn)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]養(yǎng)老金外文翻譯--養(yǎng)老金的未來(lái)和老年人對(duì)社會(huì)的貢獻(xiàn)(英文)
- 開封市h社區(qū)中老年人機(jī)構(gòu)養(yǎng)老意愿及影響因素研究
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]養(yǎng)老金外文翻譯--養(yǎng)老金的未來(lái)和老年人對(duì)社會(huì)的貢獻(xiàn)中英全
- 2015年養(yǎng)老金外文翻譯--養(yǎng)老金的未來(lái)和老年人對(duì)社會(huì)的貢獻(xiàn)
- 中級(jí)養(yǎng)老護(hù)理人員技能培訓(xùn)——老年人心理護(hù)理
- 餐飲服務(wù)食品檢驗(yàn)機(jī)構(gòu)管理規(guī)范
- 養(yǎng)老服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)老年人健康評(píng)估服務(wù)規(guī)范
- 2015年養(yǎng)老金外文翻譯--養(yǎng)老金的未來(lái)和老年人對(duì)社會(huì)的貢獻(xiàn).DOCX
- 不同類型養(yǎng)老機(jī)構(gòu)中老年人主觀幸福感的影響因素研究及建議
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論