“尊德性”與“道問(wèn)學(xué)”——清代漢學(xué)、宋學(xué)治學(xué)之辨

1、 1 中圖分類(lèi)號(hào)： 密 級(jí)： UDC： 本校編號(hào)： 10652 碩 士 學(xué) 位 論 文 論文題目： ?尊德性?與?道問(wèn)學(xué)? ——清代漢學(xué)、宋學(xué)治學(xué)之辨 研究生姓名： 王 銀 冰 學(xué)號(hào)： 2010 20100101

2、020022 0101020022 校內(nèi)指導(dǎo)教師姓名： 單 正 齊 職稱(chēng)： 副教授 副教授 校外指導(dǎo)教師姓名： 職務(wù)職稱(chēng)： 申請(qǐng)學(xué)位等級(jí)： 碩 士 學(xué)科： 哲 學(xué) 專(zhuān)業(yè)：中國(guó)哲學(xué) 中國(guó)哲學(xué) 論文提交日期： 2013 2013 年 月 日 論文答辯日期： 2013 2013 年 月 日 3 A

3、bstract “Since the Han Dynasty,after two thousand years,Confucian along the wave,learn all six changes”,but“to its destination,but Sinology,Neo-Confucianism two,mutual win”,therefore,the controversy between Sinology

4、and Neo-Confucianism is the core academic problem throughout the history of Qing Dynasty.At the beginning of the Qing Dynasty period, Neo-Confucianism because of its emptiness and the evils of the lash,Sinology rose up,b

5、y the Qing Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty jiaqing period,to the development of academic development towards its peak.At that time,the scholars of Sinology came forth in large numbers,and Sinology research results are an imm

6、ense number of books,and become the dominant of the academic Sinology replaced.With the emerging internal and external crises of the reign of the Qing Dynasty when Sinology movement by the gloom and bad,by Fang Dongshu’s

7、“Sinology discuss and consider”published as an opportunity to discuss,Neo-Confucianism launches a fierce counterattack on Sinology.The people of Neo-Confucianism who attack the drawbacks of Sinology rigidly,trivia

8、l,once silent Neo-Confucianism showing a “resurgence”trend. Neo-Confucianism revives when drawing on the lessons of Sinology,and does not take the attitude negate the success of Sinology,but certainly the strengths of it

9、s scholarship,and thus learning,absorbing the essence of Sinology.Sinology also reflects the problems,the academic idea of desalination parochial prejudice,and thinks Sinology and Neo-Confucianism have no fundamental dif

10、ferences,but the common root.So the long-standing struggle between Sinology and Neo-Confucianism,gradually fusion of Sinology and Neo-Confucianism adopting both instesd become the academic trends.This paper attem

11、pts to start from the three stages of the academic development of the Qing Dynasty,the academic development of the different academic background and historical background,analysis of Neo-Confucianism “honoring the nature

12、 of morality”and Sinology “question of different attitude to learn”,in-depth study by Neo-Confucianism’s decline to Sinology,and then to Neo-Confucianism,so that,eventually,both by the battle toward full integratio