代物清償?shù)睦碚撆c實(shí)踐問題研究.pdf

1、黑龍江大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文代物清償?shù)睦碚撆c實(shí)踐問題研究姓名：鄭玉祥申請學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：法律民商法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：孫毅20081113黑龍江大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文AbstractThelegaldeviceofacceptanceinthefulfillmentoflieureferstothesituationthatthecreditoracceptsotherwaysoffulfillmentinsteadoftheoriginallyagr

2、eedone，SOthattheobligationCallbewindupItwillhelpthecreditorrealizehis／herrightsandinterestinthecircumstancethattheagreedperformancerenderedimpossible，itwillfacilitatethepartiestochooseamorereasonablesubjectmatteraccordin

3、gtothesituationitwillalsohavetheobligationperformedassoonaspossibleanddiversifythecontentoftheobligationAsawayofwindinguptheobligationthislegaldeviceisprescribedinlawsofmanycountries，however，thereisnosuchkindofprescripti

4、oninChineselaw；itiswidelyrecognizedinthepracticeandamongscholarsinaccordance、析tlltheprincipleofcontractfreedomThelegaldeviceofacceptanceinthefulfillmentoflieuisasubstituteofperformance，itsconceptcomesoutoftheperformance，

5、thoughthereishugedifferencebetweenthem，themostdistinctivefeatureisthatitisakindofcontractAsacontract，itsnatureismuchdebated，somepeopleinsistthatitisthekindofcontractexecutedbytransferringthesubjectmatterwhileothersbeliev

6、eitisarefreshmentofthecontract，someothersconsideritasaspecialwayofmodifyingthecontractBesides，inthefieldofchangingthesubjectmatteroftheobligationthereexistothertwolegaldevicesbesidesthediscussedone，namelytheindirectperfo

7、rmanceandtherefreshmentoftheobligationtheydifferslightlyandoverlap、析t11eachotherinthepracticeThispaperwillanalyzetheconstitutiveelementsfromtheaboveaspectsanddiscussthedebatedproblemsofthelegaldeviceofacceptanceinthefulf