我國(guó)法官庭外調(diào)查權(quán)研究.pdf

1、學(xué)校編碼：學(xué)校編碼：10384分類號(hào)分類號(hào)學(xué)號(hào)：學(xué)號(hào)：200308223UDC碩士學(xué)位論文我國(guó)法官庭外調(diào)查權(quán)研究我國(guó)法官庭外調(diào)查權(quán)研究TheResearchofJudge’sRightofOutofCourtInvestigationinChina徐歆徐歆指導(dǎo)教師姓名：宋方青教授專業(yè)名稱：法律碩士論文提交日期：2006年4月論文答辯時(shí)間：2006年月學(xué)位授予日期：2006年月答辯委員會(huì)主席:評(píng)閱人:2006年4月ABSTRACTABST

2、RACTTheJudge’srighttoinvestigateoutsidetheCourtisaveryuniquelegalsystemincontinentallawsystem.Tostudythesystemcancontributestothedevelopmentperfectionofourcriminalprocedure.Thearticlemainlyprovidesapproachesofcomparative

3、analysislogicalreasoningtoresearchthetheeticalpracticalissuesofinvestigationoutofcourtbyjudgesindertoreflectcurrentrelevantlegalsysteminChina.ThearticlestartswiththedefinitionofJudge’srightofOutofCourtInvestigationthende

4、monstratesspecificcontentsofitinversatileaspectsanglesthroughhizontalcomparisonmethodthendiscussesthehistysurveyofthesystemconcludesitshisticalrulesbyverticalcomparisonmethod.Afterthatthearticledeeplyfindsoutitsvalueient

5、ationthroughtwobreakpointsofsubstantivejusticeproceduraljusticeestablishesreconstructionassumptionofthesystem.Thearticleisdividedintofourchaptersasfollows:Chapter1givesageneraldeionofJudge’srightofOutofCourtInvestigation

6、.FirstitconfirmsitscontentsbycomparisonsofregulationsamongcontinentallawsystemcommonlawsystemthesysteminChina.thenitdemonstratesthesysteminaspectsofconditionscopepeculiaritymodeetc.Chapter2analysesthedevelopmenttrackofth

7、esystemfromfeudalinquisitionalproceedingstofunctionalproceedingsconcludestherulesofhisticaldevelopmentofthesystem.Chapter3researchescriminalprocedurevalueintheaspectsofsubstantivejusticeproceduraljustice.Chapter4achieves