基于語病評判的語言學(xué)研究與實踐.pdf

1、華中師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文基于語病評判的語言學(xué)研究與實踐姓名：馮文賀申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：李向農(nóng)20080401碩士學(xué)位論文MASTER’STHESISAbstractThefaultywordingjudgmentcallseⅣeasallimportantstartingpointoflinguisticstudyaIldisalsoofmemodologyimportanceSettingout仔omt

2、hepositionoffaultywordingjudgment，thispaperdiscussesitsthreeaspects：theresearchonjudgingobjects(1anguagephenomena)，theresearchonjudgingcriterions(syntaxcriterionsa11dsemantic，logicc訂terion)andthereseaIchonjudgingoperatio

3、nsFollowingtheprincipleof“carr)，ingoutStudieswithfacts戳lddeVelopingtheoriesinpractice”，weobtainedsomeimportantfindingsbycarryingouttheresearchinmethodologicalcasestudiesorgeneralstudies(1)Languagephenomenaaredif梵嗽ltinval

4、iditywhenthesemanticrepetitionmixeswithsyntacticalconstituentredundancyindifrerentways(2)Synta乎naticallyspeaking，the“adVerbnoun”fomlisimproperAdVerbsc鋤notbecombinedwithotherwordcate90矗esd主rectly’andtheyonlyfhctionaSasynt

5、acticunitBasedont11ea增阻mentationofthisbasicmle，wededucedaseriesofimportalltconclusions(3)Theinnuencesof109ictothevalidityofSpeechmainlylieinstmcturesunderthesyntacticlevelGenerallyspeaking，the109icofreaSonc鋤otbedisobeyed

6、andthelogicofreasonisusedasacTiterionmostoftimeduringfaultywordingjudgmentprocessHoweVer，rhetoricme吼ingswilloccurwhenthec血erionisofrendedintentionally，de矗nitely，aIldinreasonThefomallo百ccannotbeo肫ndedinsynta)【Omerwise，itw

7、illbecon如singSomeseeminglyillo西clanguagephenomenahaVesometllingtodowithdialectical109icandomerswiththemeallingof1anguagef0肌(4)Moreworkcanbedoneinfauhywordingjudgmentstlldy：toincreasea|lddetailizea1191esofjudgment，to叩timi

8、zeaccuracyofjudgmentandt0improVemeValidityofjudgmentAsaverygoodstaningpointtolinguisticstudy，faultywordingjudgmentwille臟ctiVelyco仰ectlaIlguageapplicationwithlinguisticstudya11dcommonlanguageuserswithlinguisticresearchers

9、ThefaultywordingjudgmentplaySa11imponantr01einthedevelopmentoflinguistics，andthepurSuitoffaultywordingjudgmentisinlinewitllthatofexplanatory黟鋤marincontemporary1inguisticstudyKeywords：faultywordingjudgment；methodology；lin