試論先秦時期否定副詞“勿”與“毋”.pdf

1、摘要中文摘要對否定副詞的研究相對集中于對其起源和用法的研究，而對特定時代演變的研究則比較薄弱。斷代研究是漢語史的基礎工作，否定副詞“勿”和“毋“在先秦時期的語言特點，雖已有一定量的專著和論文，但并未對代表性的著作進行窮盡式的統(tǒng)計分析，無法客觀反映語言事實與發(fā)展。本文在前人的研究成果基礎之上，以先秦時期的26部重要文獻為研究對象，以語法功能、語義功能和語用功能三個平面的理論為基礎，調(diào)查“勿”和“毋“的相關(guān)格式，進而比較分析，試圖探究出否定

2、副詞“勿’’和“毋“在先秦時期的發(fā)展狀況和演變規(guī)律，希望對先秦時期否定副詞“勿“和“毋”的面貌進行初步的探索。本文共分六章：第一章：對否定副詞“勿“、“毋“在先秦文獻中的分布進行考察分析，描繪其使用概況，在先秦時期“勿”比“毋“更常用一些。第二章：從語法角度對二者進行比較。調(diào)查“勿”、“毋“同各種謂語的結(jié)合能力，多使用動詞謂語句，較少使用名詞謂語旬和形容詞謂語句：動詞謂語句中，二者大多修飾及物動詞，極少修飾不及物動詞?！拔稹昂蠹拔飫釉~多

3、數(shù)不帶賓語，少數(shù)帶賓語，“毋”多數(shù)帶賓語；賓語都以名詞或名詞中心語為主，“毋“句賓語可以前置；兩者的主語句都以施事主語句為主。語法功能有一定的差別。第三章：從語義角度對二者進行比較。二者都以禁止義為主，也可以表示一般否定；同時還對它們的其它語義進行探討。第四章：從語用角度對二者進行比較。調(diào)查主語句的類型及其表達效果?！拔稹啊ⅰ拔恪本渲械闹髡Z內(nèi)容都較豐富，“勿”的主語更常見于表示在上者；“毋“句主要用在首發(fā)句，以提供最新的消息?！拔恪?/p>

4、常表規(guī)章禮儀，語氣較嚴肅。第五章：對“勿=毋之”的探討。傳統(tǒng)觀點認為，“勿=毋之”，從語言實際和語言理論兩方面看，都不成立。第六章：總結(jié)前文內(nèi)容，描述兩者在先秦時期的發(fā)展狀況和演變，提出文中尚存的疑問與不足。關(guān)鍵詞：勿毋語法語義語用》o∥冬_毒～√礦露壤餿H，，&多7，吖0翁；0，p【。博卜h一摘要●●____●__●__●_●l________●________●___●_______●I_一IlllI__I__lI_●_____●_

5、●_______●●ll●__●l●●_●_l___AbstractTheresearchofthenegativeadverbsmainlyfocusedontheiroriginsandtheirapplicationsandlessemphasiswaslaidontheirevolutioninthehistoryStudyondynastiesisoneoftheelementtaskinhistoryofChineselan

6、guage，theresearchofthelanguagefeaturesofthenegativeadverbs”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(毋)”inPre—QinPeriod，hasproducedacertainamountofmonographsandpapers，buttheydidnotcarryoutexhaustiveworkontherepresentationtypeofstatisticalanalysis，an

7、ddidnotoWectivelyreflectthefactsoflanguageandtheirdevelopmentSoto26importantdocumentsinpreQinperiodastheresearchobject，thispaperwillbebasedontheresultsofpreviousstudiesAccordingtothethreedimensionaltheoryaboutgrammatical

8、functions，semanticfeaturesandpragmaticfunctions，wewillinvestigatetherelevanceofnegativeadverbs”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(毋)”，andthenmakeacomparativeanalysis，attempttoexplorethedevelopmentandevolutionofthenegativeadverbs”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(

9、毋)”inpreQinperiodAtlastwewanttoexploretheoverviewofthepre—Qinpedodofnegativeadverbs”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(毋)”ingeneralT11isdissertationconsistsofsixchaptersChapterOneThePapefinthischapterwillexamineandanalyzethedistributionofthen

10、egativeadverb”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(毋)”inPreQinPeriod，thenDescribe也eirusageTheconclusionisthat”Wu(勿)”ismorecommonthan”Wu(毋)”ChaptertwoComparethetwonegativeadverbsof”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(毋)”intheaspectsofGrammarthischapterwillinvestigatet

11、hebindingcapacityof”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(毋)”withmanykindsofpredicate，andthisistheconclusionTheyusedverbpredictivesentencesmorethanadjectivepredictivesentencesandnourlpredictivesentencesInverbpredictivesentencesThelargestnumberof

12、themcouldbemodifiedtransitiveverbsandaverysmallnumberofthemcouldbemodifedintransitiveverbsMostofthetransitiveverbsmodifiedby”Wu(勿ycouldnotbefollowedbyobjects，andlesscallbefollowed：Howevermostofthetransitiveverbsmodifiedb

13、y”Wu(毋)”couldbefollowedbyobjectsBothoftheirobjectswerenounsornounphraseasthecenterinthemajorityTheprecededobjectwasaformofoWectsof”Wu(毋)”BothofthemweredominatedbyShivictimstatementswhentheywereinthesubjectclauseTheywered

14、ifferentfromeachotherintheaspectsofGrammarChapterthreeComparethetwonegativeadverbsintheaspectofSemantics”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(毋)”weresaidtoprohibitatmost，theyalsocouldbeexpressedasageneralnegativesometimes；atthesametime，theother

15、sensesofthemwerealsodiscussedinthischapterChapterfourComparethetwonegativeadverbsintheaspectofPragrnatics。ThepaperinthischapterInvestigatethetypesofthesubjectclausesandtheexpressionresultsrespectivelyTheirsubjectswerever

16、yrichincontentThedifferentiationof”Wu(勿)”and”Wu(毋)”inchoosingsubjectswasthat，thesubjectclausesof”Wu(勿)”weremorecommonthanWu(毋)”andwereusedtoindicateahigherlevelnormallyToprovidethe1atestnews，Wu(毋)”mainlyusedinthestarting