

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、 Abstract Whether does the system play a positive role, achieve the value goal which it decides and obtain populace's widespread approval and support, the key lies in this system itself whether it is “good”. Only the
2、 system which takes “justice” as the value goal is the good system. The meaning of justice is vast. From the ethical perspective, justice contains an equal right to freedom, as well as the most common ethical standards u
3、nder specific social and historical conditions. Our country has the glorious historical and cultural traditions. Behind the seemingly simple system of selecting officials, there is also a extremely rich social culture co
4、nnotation. The importance of Chinese nation's traditional moral values can not be neglected in the transmission of five thousand years of history. All aspects of social life have been marked with a deep imprint of tr
5、aditional morality. The system , as a standard set to adjust people’s behavior under the specific historical conditions, the formulation of its value goal as well as the system itself are deeply influenced by the ethic
6、s environment. This article is intended to survey the social and ethical problems behind the system from the ethical perspective by studying the evolution of Chinese ancient system of selecting officials, and reveal the
7、importance of social ethics behind the system through the analysis of ancient Chinese society under the patriarchal system “home world“ and how the Confucianism influence the system of selecting officials. Thus we can kn
8、ow clearly that which requirements a “good” system should meet as well as how to implement the system of “good”. The assessment methods of Ancient Chinese system for selecting officials were unitary, the pattern is ossi
9、fied and limited by feudal hierarchy. It is difficult to achieve a fair selection in the true sense. But the value that the system place on officials’ moral level and the pursuit of justice still have the positive refere
10、nce value to today’s merit system. Our today's merit system still should pay attention to the selection of officials’ moral qualities, promote the new era of “rule of virtue” and socialist morality. The civil service
11、 examination system should take justice as the ultimate value goal, made every effort to achieve fair, and be open. Only in this way the system can achieve good and a high-quality civil service can be selected and cultiv
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 中國(guó)古代官員的退休制度源于周朝
- 中國(guó)古代社會(huì)人才選拔制度探析
- 中國(guó)古代契約倫理研究
- 中國(guó)古代契約倫理研究.pdf
- 中國(guó)古代制度關(guān)系
- 中國(guó)古代起訴制度
- 中國(guó)古代制度論文
- 中國(guó)古代制度分類
- 中國(guó)古代環(huán)境倫理價(jià)值的反思
- 中國(guó)古代環(huán)境倫理價(jià)值的反思.pdf
- 中國(guó)古代賦稅制度
- 中國(guó)古代土地制度沿革
- 中國(guó)古代書籍制度
- 淺論影響中國(guó)古代官員政治素質(zhì)的因素
- 中國(guó)古代復(fù)仇制度研究.pdf
- 中國(guó)古代監(jiān)察制度述論.pdf
- 中國(guó)古代旌表制度研究.pdf
- 中國(guó)古代監(jiān)察制度研究.pdf
- 中國(guó)古代刑訊制度探析.pdf
- 試論中國(guó)古代刑訊制度.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論