版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、外文翻譯Valuecreationdestructionincrossbderacquisitions:anempiricalanalysisoffeignacquisitionsofU.S.firmsMaterialSource:StrategicManagementJournalAuth:AnjuSethKeanP.SongR.RidsonPettitWeconductaninvestigationofthesourcesofgai
2、nslossesincrossbderacquisitionsinlightofdifferentmotivesfundertakingthesetransactions:synergyseekingmanagerialismhubris.Wefindthatthedataareconsistentwiththeexpectationthatmultiplesourcesofvaluecreationexistinsynergistic
3、crossbderacquisitions:assetsharingreverseinternalizationofvaluableintangibleassetsfinancialdiversification.Gainsaccruetobidderfirmshareholdersonlyftheleastfungibleofthesesourcesofgainsi.e.reverseinternalization.Fvaluedes
4、troyingacquisitionsthatareexpectedtobedrivenbymanagerialismwefindthatthedataareconsistentwithonlyoneofthesourcesofvaluedestructionthatweexaminei.e.riskreduction.Intheseacquisitionstheevidencealsosuggeststhattherelativesi
5、zeofthetargettothebiddermitigatesthenegativeeffectsofriskreduction.Ourresultsunderscetheimptanceofconsideringtheimplicationsofalternativebehavialassumptionsinempiricalstrategycontentresearch.Thelastdecadehaswitnessedasur
6、geoftakeoveractivitybyfeignfirmsofU.S.cpations.FexampleW.T.Grimm’s2000MergerstatReviewreptsthatthenumberoftheseacquisitions(fbrevitywerefertotheseascrossbderacquisitions1)increasedfrom197to959inthe15yearperiodbetween1985
7、1999theirvalueincreasedfrom$10.9billionto$272.1billion.Crossbderacquisitionsaccountedf6percentoftakeoveractivityintheUnitedStatesin1985by1999thisshareroseto19percent.Inlightoftheburgeoningimptanceofthephenomenonrecentres
8、earchinthestrategyinternationalbusinessfinancefieldshasattemptedtodescribeexplainvariousaspectsofthisactivity.Theresearchindicatesthattheaveragecrossbderacquisitionreflectsanincreaseofabout7.5percentinthevalueofthecombin
9、edfirmsrelativetotheirpreacquisitionvalue(seeEunKolodnyScheraga1996SethSongPettit2000).Howeverthereislimitedevidenceonwhythesevalueincreasesacterizecrossbderacquisitionsi.e.whatsourcesofthisassumptionisinfactsupptedbythe
10、empiricalevidence.SpecificallySSP(2000)examinetheextenttowhichcrossbderacquisitionsareacterizedbythesynergyhypothesisvs.themanagerialismhypothesisthehubrishypothesis.Themanagerialismmotivesuggeststhatmanagersofacquiringf
11、irmsembarkonacquisitionstomaximizetheirownutilityattheexpenseoftheshareholdersofthefirm.Thehubrishypothesissuggeststhatbiddingfirmmanagersmakemistakesinevaluatingtargetfirmsbutundertakeacquisitionspresumingthattheirvalua
12、tionsarecrect.SSP(2000)findthatthesynergyhypothesisistheprimaryexplanationfvalueincreasingacquisitionsalthoughthehubrishypothesisappearstocoexistwiththesynergyfthissample.Valuereducingacquisitionsappeartobeprimarilydrive
13、nbymanagerialismratherthanhubris.Inlightoftheabovethemotivationfthisstudyisasfollows.Weconjecturethattheassumptionthatthesynergyhypothesishomogeneouslyacterizesallacquisitionsinthesamplemayunderlietheweakmixedresultsofpr
14、eviousstudiesonthesourcesofgainsincrossbderacquisitions.AsHattenSchendel(1977)BassCattinWittink(1978)pointoutcrosssectionalregressionmethodologyassumesthattherelationshipsofinterestarehomogeneousacrossallfirmsinthesample
15、.Howeverifthereareavarietyofbehavialmotivesthatunderliecrossbderacquisitionactivitythisassumptionislikelytobeviolatedtheempiricalresultsfromaregressionanalysisbecomedifficulttointerpret.Fexampleinternalizationinthepresen
16、ceofmarketfrictionsisanimptanttheeticalexplanationofsynergisticgainsincrossbderacquisitions(butonethathasreceivedsurprisinglylittleempiricalsuppt).Ifanempiricaltestofthishypothesisisconductedbyregressingaproxyfinternaliz
17、ationontotalgainsfthefullsampleitmaywellbethatnosystematicpatternisrevealedifinfactasignificantproptionofthesampleisacterizedbyvaluedestructionratherthanvaluecreation.Thispaperdescribesourinvestigationofthesourcesofgains
18、incrossbderacquisitionswhereinweconsiderdifferentunderlyingbehavialassumptionsregardingdecisionmaking.SpecificallyinlightoftheresultsreptedbySSP(2000)wedistinguishempiricallyamongcrossbderacquisitionsthatarelikelytobeact
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 外文翻譯---歐洲、美國的跨國并購經(jīng)驗
- 外文翻譯---通過并購創(chuàng)造價值
- 經(jīng)濟財務(wù)外文翻譯 --歐洲、美國的跨國并購經(jīng)驗
- 美國跨國公司并購分析.pdf
- 多元統(tǒng)計分析中的因子分析法的應(yīng)用
- 基于統(tǒng)計分析法的腫瘤特征基因提取和分類研究.pdf
- 外文翻譯----sas統(tǒng)計分析軟件和logistic回歸
- 外文翻譯---關(guān)于美國跨國公司的成本管理
- 土耳其保險公司統(tǒng)計分析預(yù)警模型[外文翻譯]
- 并購創(chuàng)造價值
- 美國跨國公司在華并購現(xiàn)狀與對策分析
- 統(tǒng)計分析預(yù)測財務(wù)危機【外文翻譯】
- 企業(yè)并購行為統(tǒng)計分析與預(yù)測
- 暢銷商品的統(tǒng)計分析辨識法
- 跨國公司的影響【外文翻譯】
- 跨國公司并購的博弈分析.pdf
- 統(tǒng)計分析
- 統(tǒng)計分析
- 應(yīng)用統(tǒng)計分析法探究汽車制造企業(yè)競爭力
- 跨國公司和溢出效應(yīng)【外文翻譯】
評論
0/150
提交評論