管制限制性商業(yè)行為的法律比較分析——以國(guó)際技術(shù)貿(mào)易為例.pdf

1、對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文管制限制性商業(yè)行為的法律比較分析——以國(guó)際技術(shù)貿(mào)易為例姓名：汪璐申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：國(guó)際貿(mào)易學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：冷柏軍20090401AbstractInternationalTechnologyTradehasdevelopedrapidlysince1960sBecausedevelopedcountriespossessmonopolyadvantagesbothineconomyandtechnology

2、restrictivebusinesspractices(RBP)hasbeenoccurredfiequentlyininternationaltechnologytradeThishasseverelydamagedtheeconomicinterestofdevelopingcountriesastechnologytransfereesCurrentlynoconsensushasbeenreachedconcerningthe

3、controlofrestrictivebusinesspracticeThisarticlefirstanalyzedtheconceptandcharacteristicsofRBP，andfounddifferentattitudestowardsRBPbetweendevelopedcountriesanddevelopingcountriesbasedontheresearchofeachcountry’Slegaladjus

4、tmentsSecondlythisarticlecomparedthelegalregulationsinfouraspectsincludinglegalSOurCe，evaluationcriterion，legalprinciplesandlegalapplications，andconcludedthethreemajorargumentsofthetwopartiesFinallybasedontheanalysisofth

5、estatusquoofChina’SRBPregulationthisarticleintroducedalegislativeproposalonsettingupalegalsystemwithantimonopolylawasthecoretoprotectChina’seconomicinterestandsecurityininternationaltechnologytradeMostdevelopedcountriesr

6、egulateRBPwithantimonopolylawonlyJapanhasundergonethetransitionfromindividualregulationtoantimonopolylaw，whichisasimilarlegislativeprocess硒ChinaTherefore，thisarticlefocusedonJapaneseanti—monopolylawandfoundexperiencestha

7、tcouldbeappliedinChina’SlegislationTheestablishmentofChina’Santi—monopolylawisthebeginningofcontrollingRBPwithsoundlegalsystem；italsequiredsuccessfulexperiencefromabroad，clearenforcementauthorities，developmentofsupportin