簡介：華中師范大學碩士學位論文可持續(xù)發(fā)展的哲學探討姓名秦益成申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)科技哲學指導教師劉仁忠200061ABSTRACTSUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENTJSASUBJECTOFWHICHCONTENTI5ABOUTTHECONTEMPLATIONOFENVIRONMENTALPROBLEMS，OFTHEHUMAN。SEXISTENCEANDDEVELOPMENTJNTHEFUTURE．THEESSENCEOFTHEENVIRONMENTALPROBLEMSISTHERELATIONBETWEENMANANDNATURE．ANDTHEESSENCCOFMANISTHESUMOFALLKINDSOFSOCIALRELATIONSHIPS．HENCE．MAN．NATUREANDSOCIETYMAKEUPANORGANISM．INTOWHICHTHEENVIRONMENTALPROBLEMSMUSTBEPUTTOTHINKOVERHISTORICALLY．SO．THEENVIRONMENTALPROBLEMSCANBETRANSFORMEDINTOANOTHERISSUCHISTORYOFTHEENVIRONMENTALPOLLUTIONTHEPRESENTCONDITIONSOFTHEENVIRONMENTALPROBLEMS?一．SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT．THEHISTORYOFTHEENVIRONMEFLTA】POLLUTIONIUSTISTHEHISTORYOFCAPITALISTICEXPANSION；THEREALITYOFTHEENVIRONMENTAJPROBLEMSALSOREFLECTSTHATOFCAPITAL．WHOSHOULDTAKETHEMAINRESPONSIBILITYOFTHEPRESENTGLOBALENVIRONMENTA】PROBLEMSMUSTBEJUDGEDACCORDINGTOFACTSNOTTOELOQUENCE．HOWEVER，ADVANCEDNATIONSSTILLTAKETHEPROBLEMSASAMEANTOCURBDEVELOPINGCOUNTRIES．ENDOWINGNATUREOBJCCTS”RIGHTS”AND”INTERNALVALUE”NOTONLYISHARDTOBERECOGNIZEDTHEORETICALLY,BUTALSOISHARDTOPUTINTOPRACTICE．”REVERINGLIFE”MA5BCCONSIDCREDASTHE”ANIMALISM”AND“THEORYOFORIGINALSIN”WHICHAREDETONATEDBYMODERNTERMS．”MAN”EXPLAINEDINENVIRONMCNTA】ETHICSJSUNDERTHE”MAN”EXPRESSEDBYFEUERBACH．ITISNOGOODINSOLVINGENVIRONMENTALPROBLEMSANDINHELPINGPEOPLESEETHROUGHSOCIALRELATIONSHIPSBEHINDTHECNVIRONMENTALPROBLEMS．SOCALLEDHISTORYISTHEPROCESSWHICHISPRODUCEDBYHUMAN’SLABOR；ISTHEPROCESSINWHICHNATUREDEVELOPEDTOWARD”MAN”，THEDEVELOPMENTOFTHEHUMAN’SPRACTICALABILITYCONTINUOUSLYWIDENTHERANGEOFTHEMAN．DONEWORLDANDDEEPENJTSDEPTH．PRODUCERICHERANDRICHERMATERIALCIVILIZATIONSANDSPIRITUALIIFCASWELLASSOCIALRELATIONSHIPSANDA11．1EVELDEVELOPEDMAN．ONTHEOTHERBAND．ONTHECERTAINSTAGEOFHISTORY,HUMAN’SPRACTISEALWAYSMUSTBERESTRICTEDBYNATURALANDSOCIALRULES．SOTHERESULTSOFTHEHUMAN。SPRACTISECONTAINTHEEFFECTOFANTISUB；EELWHICHWASEXPRESSEDASENVIRONMENTA】PROBLEMSINTHEASPECTOFNATUREANDASALIENATEDLABORINTHEASPECTOFSOCIETY．THEFINA】SOLUTIONOFTHEENVIRONMENTALPROBLEMSANDREALIZATIONOFSUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENTRELYONTHEPERSISTENTDEVELOPINGTHEHUMAN’SPRACTICALABILITY,MASTERINGNATURALANDSOCIALRULESANDREALIZING”THETWOPROMOTIONS”．KEYWORDSSUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT，ENVIRONMENTALPROBLEMSENVIRONMENTA】ETHICS，PRACTISE

簡介：北京交通大學碩士學位論文發(fā)展哲學視野下中國現(xiàn)代化進程中代價問題的思考姓名劉文強申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學指導教師路日亮20070401ABSTRACTABSTRACTTHEMODERNIZATIONTOOKTHESOCIALDEVELOPMENTTHESPECIALSTAGE．ISCHINESEANDTHEWORLDCOMMONSUBJECT，BUTFOLLOWSTHEPRICEQUESTIONWHICHTHISDEVELOPINGPROCESSPRODUCESALSO協(xié)BECOMETHEMAINMELODYWHICHTHECHINESEANDFOREIGNSCHOLARSTUDIES．11IISARTICLEIIITHEFRAMEOFDEVELOPMENTPHILOSOPHYEMBARKSFROMTHEPRICEOBJECTIVEREALITYANDTOHUMANSSUBJECTIVEINFLUENCE．FOCUSESANDPRACTICESTWOBIGACTIVITIESJNHUMAN’SUNDERSTANDING,ANDDYNAMICUNIFIEDTHEWAYAO∞RDINGTOTHESTATICSTATETOEXPLAININTHESOCIALDEVELOPMENTPRICEQUESTION．THEAFLICLEBELIEVEDTHA‘MEPRICEEXISTENCEHASITSOBJECTIVITYANDTHEINEVITABIFITY,MUSTREGARDTHEPRICEDIALECTICALLYATTHESAMETIME．THEACEISTHEDEVELOPMENTINTRINSICLINK,ISREALIZESTHESOCIALDEVELOPMENTGOALMETHODANDINTERMEDIARY,ANDDENIESTHEWAYHASPOINTEDOUTTHESOCIALDEVELOPMENTFRESHTARGETANDTHENEWDIRECTION；ONTHEOTHERHAND，THEPRICEALSOISINTHEMAINBODYVALUEREALIZATIONPROCESSNEGATIVENEGA曲IT、，F(xiàn)ACTOR．THEREFOREINTHEMODERNIZEDADVANCEMENT,MUSTHAVETOREALIZETHETRANSFORMATIONFROMTHEA∞SSDEVELOPMENTOFHIDDENPRICETOTHESCIENTIFICDEVELOPMENTOFCOORDINATEDPRICE．THEREFO峨THEARTICLEHASANALYZEDTHEMAJORISSUEWHICHTHECHINESEMODERNIZATIONUNTILNOWTHEACEORIGINANDTHEPERFORMANCEASWELLASTHECURRENTSOCIETYCONSTRUCTFACE．SINCEANDINSPECTEDTHEMODEGNTIMESIUTHEWESTEMMODEMIZATIONADVANCEMENTTHEPFICEQUESTIONHISTORICALEVOLUTION,HASCARRIEDONTHEPONDERUNDERSTANDINGTOTHECONTEMPORARYAIINAMODERNIZATIONP酊∞QUESTION．FINALLY,PROPOSEDMUSTSET叩IHESCIENCETHEDEVELOPMENTVIEWANDTHEP打∞VIEW,ANDPRACTICESFROMTHESOCIALIZEDPELSONAUNDERSTANDINGANALYZESTHEIE_％卸咄CARRIESONTHEDEVELOPMENTPATTAMANDTHEVALUECHOICEINTHEDEVELOPMENTMAINBODYANDINTHEMETHODSIGNIFICANCE．REALIZATIONINTHETRUESELLSCPERSONANDSOCIETYSDEVELOPMENT．KEYWORDSPRICE；MODEMIZATION『；DEVELOPMENTCLASSN0BOD

簡介：安徽大學碩士學位論文古典政治哲學源頭中的赫西俄德的神話詩姓名李琮申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)外國哲學指導教師陳義平20070501兩是作為道德支配神界和人類社會，反映了平常人反對暴力渴望和平，尋求良善幸福生活的心態(tài)。其次，指出以赫西俄德的作品為重要組成部分的神話，肇始希臘哲學的產(chǎn)生，如神話中的宇宙觀、秩序等觀念對哲學家世界本原、規(guī)律和本質(zhì)等問題的啟發(fā)。第六部分主要分析其對希臘古典政治哲學產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展的影響。他最早提出了正義是“應得的”內(nèi)涵，同時也指出了僭越這個內(nèi)涵所招致的懲罰性的后果。這個思想啟發(fā)了梭侖、畢達哥拉斯和柏拉圖等人。尤其是在亞里士多德的正義觀里都可以看到赫西俄德的影子。當這些思想運用到對現(xiàn)實城邦政治生活的研究中時，成為了希臘古典政治哲學的核心概念之一。此外，他的作品蘊涵了古典政治哲學的主要特征將道德原則運用到政治生活申成為統(tǒng)治規(guī)則，同時還包含了一些重要的觀念，如有差異的平等等，這些都對古典政治哲學的發(fā)生和發(fā)展起了積極的促進作用。本文堅持歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一的方法論原則，從政治哲學的角度結(jié)合作者的歷史背景，對其作品進行邏輯的分析和把握；結(jié)合史料細致地研究文本，力求還原文本的真實面貌，把握其在古希臘思想史中的地位和影響，及對古典政治哲學的啟發(fā)。關(guān)鍵詞古典政治哲學赫西俄德IT_Y、．

簡介：R少。北京交通大學碩士學位論文叔本華哲學視角下的白鯨解讀MOBYDICKINTHEVISIONOFARTHURSCHOPENHAUER’SPHILOSOPHY作者萬虹導師宮玉波北京交通大學2011年6月作者萬虹導師姓名宮玉波學位類別文學學科專業(yè)英語語言文學PHILOSOPHY一一學號09122345職稱教授學位級別碩士研究方向英美文學北京交通大學2011年6月

簡介：延邊大學碩士學位論文古代中韓佛教哲學中的圓融思想及其現(xiàn)代意義姓名王福芹申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)外國哲學指導教師金哲洙20070520ABSTRACTTHEEARLIESTBUDDHI鯽WASINTRODUCEDINTOOURCOUNTRYINTHEYEAROF2一BCDURINGTHEESTERNDYILASTYFR∞INDIINTHEERAOF百EI，JIN柚DSOUTHERNNORTHERNDYNASTIES，BUDDHI鯽ASIDELYDISS咖INATEDANDUNPRECEDENTEDLYDEVELOPEDINCHINA．THEYUANRONGTHINKINGCOMPATIBILITYORHARMONIOUSCONCEPTOFCHINESEBUDDLLISTPH訂OSOPHYWASCREATEDBYTHE髓STEROFRENZHIOFROOFTOPSCHOOL，OTHELLRISEFLOURISHEDBYTHEHU{“ANSCH00LTLLATMOSTSTRESSEDTHEYUANRONGTHINKINGINA11THESCHOOLSOFBUDDHIS虬C唧ATIBIL“Y麟THEMETHODOLOGYTOOBSERVEANDUNDERSTANDTHEORLD，THEGENERALPRINCIPLEOFDEALING_ITHALLTHEPROBL鋤S卸DALSOTHEIDEALATEOFPRAUCTICETOACHIEVE．CO叩A(chǔ)TIBILITYINTENDEDFORAPERFECTGATHERINGANDNOOBSTACLES．ASAMETHOD，ITMEANTTHATEVERYTHINGCOULDNOTONLYMAINTAINTHEORIGINAL艙TURE。BUTALSOINTERACTIVELYFUSEDITHOUTCONTRADICTIONS8NDCONFLICTS．LATERBUDDHI鈾髓SSPRE8DTOTHEKOREA“ODAY’SNORTHKOREAANDSOUTHKOREA．ANDITRASKOGURYOINTHENORTHOFKOREAFIRSTINTRODUCEDBUDDHI軸TOKOR∞D(zhuǎn)URINGTHETTLREE戤ES，THENIT舔IMPORTEDTOBAIJIANDSILLA．INTHEPERIODOFSILLADYNASTY，MOSTOFCHINESEBUDDHISTSECTSORSCH001S髓REIMPORTEDTOTHEREPUBLICOFKOREAAFTERTHESILLADYNASTYHADUNIFIEDTHETHREECOUNTRIES卸DEREGREATLYDEVELOPED．THISOPENEDAERAOFPROSPERITYOFKORE鋤BUDDHIS兒THEREEREA10TOFF猢USBUDDHISTTHEORETICIANSWHO盯OTEALOTOFPAPERSANDBOOKS，OFHICHWONHYO’SANDUICHON’SBUDDHISTTHOUGHTSWEREBESTAFFECTED．霄ONHYO’S‘H枷ONYANDCINTENTION’THEORY，剝1ICHLAIDTHETHEORETICALFOUNDATIONFORCREATINGKOREARIHUAYANSCHOOLITHMTIONALCHARACTERISTICS．UICHON_ASONEOFTHEREPRESENTATIVEFIGURESOFANCIENTKORE鋤BUDDHISTPHILOSOPHY’SC唧ATIBILITYCONCEPT．ALTHOUGHTHETHOUGHTSOFRONHYOANDUICHONCA田EFR伽CLLINA，ITHTHECHINESETHOUGHTSOFBUDDHISTPHILOSDPHYSHAREDTHESAMESTR8INS，ITHAD10TSOFINNOVATIONANDDEVELOPMENT．THEIRBUDDHISTTHOUGHTSNOTONLYHADLOFTYSTATUSINKORE8，BUTALSOHAUDIMPORT鋤TINFLUENCEUPONCHINESEBUDDHISTPHILOSOPHICTHOUGHTS，GREATLYPRO∞TEDTHEDEVELOP舶ENTOFCHINESEBUDDHI汛Ⅱ

簡介：北京交通大學碩士學位論文發(fā)展哲學視閾下當代中國消費觀的反思姓名岳蕾申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學指導教師刁志萍20080601J量塞交道厶堂亟±堂僮J金塞△旦墨B△￡至ABSTRACTABSTRACTDEVELOPMENTISTHEETERNALTHEMEOFHUMANSOCIETY．CONSUMPTION，BYSATISFYINGTHEMATERIALANDSPIRITUALDEMAND，ISTHEBASISOFHUMANSURVIVALANDDEVELOPMENTANDONEOFTHEMAJORDYNAMISMOFCONTINUOUSPROGRESS．WITHTHEDEVELOPMENTOFSOCIETY,CONSUMPTIONHASBEENPLAYINGITSROLEINSOCIALDEVELOPMENTMOREANDMOREINDEPENDENTLY．THECONSUMPTIONUNDERGUIDANCEOFTHEHEALTHY,CIVILIZEDANDSCIENTIFICAPPROACHOFCONSUMPTIONNOTONLYOPTIMIZESTHEINDUSTRIALSTRUCTURE，ADVANCESTHEPRODUCTIVITYANDECONOMICGROWTH，BUTALSOREALIZESCOORDINATEDDEVELOPMENTBETWEENMATERIALANDSPIRITUALCONSUMPTIONANDINTEGRATIONOFNATURAL，ECONOMICANDSOCIALDEMANDS．SINCETHEOPENINGUPANDREFORM，CHINAHASSEENTHEDRAMATICGROWTHINPRODUCTIVITY,THEABUNDANCEOFCONSUMABLES，THESTEADYRISEOFLIVINGSTANDARD，THEIMPROVEMENTOFCONSUMPTIONSTRUCTUREANDTHERENEWALOFAPPROACHOFCONSUMPTION．BUT，DUETOTHELONGTERMFOCUSOFECONOMICGROWTHASTHEDEVELOPMENTSTRATEGY,THESTUDYOFCONSUMPTIONHASBEENHEAVILYCENTEREDAROUNDSUCHISSUESASHOWTOEXPANDDOMESTICDEMAND，BOOMINGTHEGROWTHANDPRACTICALSTRATEGIESOFMARKETING．THEECOLOGICAL，SOCIALANDETHICALDIMENSIONSOFCONSUMPTIONHAVEBEENLARGELYIGNORED．ALONGERTERMVISIONOFSOCIALDEVELOPMENTCANNOTONLYBEBASEDONMATERIALCONSUMPTIONANDWILLHAVETODEALWITHTHESEIGNOREDISSUESANDGUIDEANDCULTIVATENEWCULTURESONCONSUMPTION．UNDERTHEPERSPECTIVEOFDEVELOPMENTPHILOSOPHY,TAKINGTHESUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENTANDHUMANFULLDEVELOPMENTASTHERESEARCHAPPROACH．BRIDGINGTHEMARXISTTHEORIESANDREFLECTIONSONTHEREALITY,THISDISSERTATIONTRIESTOEXPLORETHECAUSESOFTHEWRONGIDEASOFCONSUMPTIONANDCONSTRUCTTHEPOSSIBILITYOFANEWAPPROACHOFCONSUMPTION，THESUSTAINABLECONSUMPTION．THISNEWAPPROACHOFCONSUMPTIONWILLADVANCECHINA’SSOCIALTRANSFORMATIONANDHELPLEADTOANEWCONSUMPTIONLIFEROADINCORPORATINGMATERIAL，SPIRITUAL，POLITICALANDECOLOGICALCIVILIZATIONS．KEYWORDSCONSUME；APPROACHOFSUSTAINABLECONSUMPTION；DEVELOPMENTPHILOSOPHY

簡介：分類號徹／協(xié)J密級單位代碼10422學號汐LO／A9“⑧∥菇辦孚碩士學位論文論文題目及程磊蛤移穆咩加油壚易XP、刎膨，、易J夕侈作者學院專業(yè)指導合作姓名名稱名稱盟冱絲丕立壟教師盤盔遮絲煎導師土聳牟糾旋籃≯1≥年＼P月圬日山東大學碩士學位論文目錄中文摘要???????????????????????????1ABSTRACT???????????????????????????????????????????2第一章引言????????????????????????????3一、選題緣由及意義???????????????????????3二、文獻綜述????????????????????????9三、核心問題及研究思路???????????????????13第二章實驗哲學與直覺?????????????????????15一、實驗哲學及其研究????????????????????L51、實驗哲學的興起????????????????????????．152、實驗哲學對直覺的代表性研究??????????????．16二、實驗哲學家對直覺的挑戰(zhàn)?????????????????23三、實驗哲學引發(fā)的爭議???????????????????．．24第三章實驗哲學的問題?????????????????????27一、對實驗哲學方法的質(zhì)疑??????????????????271、實驗哲學方法?????????????????????????．．272、實驗哲學方法依賴直覺?????????????????28二、對實驗哲學結(jié)論的質(zhì)疑???????????????????291、直覺不是完全不可靠??????????????????292、直覺依賴情境????????????????????一333、直覺可靠性是連續(xù)的??????????????????34第四章認知科學方法的應用???????????????????35一、實驗哲學不能檢驗直覺可靠與否??????????????．35二、認知科學家對直覺可靠性的判斷??????????????．361、核磁共振成像技術(shù)???????????????????362、認知科學對直覺的檢驗?????????????????40結(jié)語???????????????????????????????????????????????～42

簡介：廈門大學學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人呈交的學位論文是本人在導師指導下，獨立完成的研究成果。本人在論文寫作中參考其他個人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表的研究成果，均在文中以適當方式明確標明，并符合法律規(guī)范和廈門大學研究生學術(shù)活動規(guī)范試行。另外，該學位論文為課題組的研究成果，獲得課題組經(jīng)費或?qū)嶒炇业馁Y助，在、實驗室完成。請在以上括號內(nèi)填寫課題或課題組負責人或?qū)嶒炇颐Q，未有此項聲明內(nèi)容的，可以不作特別聲明。聲明人簽名贏L骰伽I埤妨舶內(nèi)容摘要呈現(xiàn)在我們面前的歷史，是否真的是發(fā)生過的歷史?；蛘呶覀兛吹降牟贿^是歷史學家通過自己的敘述展現(xiàn)給我們的。不同的歷史學家通過自己的方式構(gòu)建了不同的歷史，表現(xiàn)為即使同一個歷史事件在不同的歷史學家的敘述中是不同的。歷史學家是通過敘述來解釋歷史，而每個歷史學家都有不同的歷史敘述方式，因而也有不同的歷史解釋。分析的歷史哲學不再關(guān)注歷史的進程和規(guī)律，而是將注意轉(zhuǎn)向歷史認識問題上來。本文著重論述了歷史哲學家阿瑟丹圖反對亨普爾非歷史地講述歷史解釋問題的原因，為了證明亨普爾“覆蓋律模式“的科學解釋和敘述形式的歷史認識已經(jīng)背道而馳，還探討了歷史認識的解釋問題和敘述問題。在文章的第二部分主要分析阿瑟丹圖提出的歷史敘述等同于歷史解釋的論證過程。當分析的歷史哲學發(fā)展到想要解決歷史解釋該怎樣得到普遍認同進而可以使歷史成為科學的問題時，就陷入了無法回答的困境。20世紀70年代，歷史哲學的研究重點又發(fā)生了重要轉(zhuǎn)向，為了詳細論述歷史解釋向敘事轉(zhuǎn)變的問題，本文以海登懷特引領(lǐng)的敘事的轉(zhuǎn)向為重點，及其代表作元史學19世紀的歐洲歷史想象為基礎(chǔ)分析了敘事的話語模式，將研究重點由歷史解釋轉(zhuǎn)向了歷史文本，并且用文學的修辭方法來構(gòu)建歷史文本。在此之前，歷史哲學著重探討了歷史解釋的問題，近些年來對于歷史文本的研討也比較盛行，但是這兩個問題之間是怎么轉(zhuǎn)變的卻很少有人研究，因此本文的用意是在這兩個階段中間架起一道溝通的橋梁，讓兩個階段的變化發(fā)展更加清楚地顯示出來。關(guān)鍵詞歷史敘述歷史解釋歷史文本

簡介：分類號B21單位代碼10028Y869659密叛T無學號2020101020首都師范大學博士學位論文歷史與詮釋一一公羊?qū)W“三科九旨”的歷史哲學解讀研究生指導教師學科專業(yè)學科方向張振楊乃喬教授文藝學比較詩學2006年5月15日ABSTRACTTHISDISSERTATIONRECONSIDERSTHECHINESETRADITIONALCLASSICSOFSPRINGANDAUTUMNANNALSGONGYANGSTUDYWITHTHEBACKGROUNDOFWESTERNSPECULATIVEANDANALYTICALHISTORICALPHILOSOPHY．RELYINGONTHEDISSERTATION，THESPRINGANDAUTUMNANNALS’GONGYANGSTUDYBASICALLYBELONGSTOTHETHEORYOFTHESPECULATIVEHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYWITHSOMEANALYTICALANDCRITICALCOGNITIONSOFHISTORICEVENTSANDTEXTS．BASINGONTHEQUALITYOFHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYOFGONGYANGSTUDY,THEDISSERTATIONALSORECOMPREHENDSSOMEPROBLEMSINCHINESEHISTORYOFTHOUGHT，RECOMMENTATESTHEDESTINYOFGONGYANGSTUDYANDSUMMARIZESTHEHISTORICALPHILOSOPHICALCHARACTERSOFGONGYANGSTUDYINCOMPARISONWIMWESTERNSPECULATIVEHISTORICALPHILOSOPHY．BESIDESINTRODUCTIONANDEPILOGUE，THEDISSERTATIONISDIVIDEDINTOFOURCHAPTERS．THEFIRSTCHAPTERDISCUSSESTHEFORMINGPROCESSOFHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYOFGONGYANGSTUDY．FROMTHEASPECTOFHISTORICALPHILOSOPHY,SPR／NGANDAUTUMNANNA居ISHISTORYINSTEADOFCHRONICLE．SPR誡GANDAUTUMNANNA如’GONGYANGZHUANHASDRAWNASERIESOFHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYPROPOSITIONS．DONGZHONGSHUEVENCREATEDTHETHEORYOFTHREEUNITIESINHISPHILOSOPHICSYSTEMOFTHEONTOLOGYOFHEAVEN．HEXIUALSOESTABLISHEDASPECULATIVEHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYSYSTEMBYRAISINGTHETHEORYOFTHREEEPOCHS．THUSGONGYANGSTUDYWASAREASONABLECONSEQUENCEOFCONFUCIANTHOUGHTSINTHEDOMAINOFHISTORICALPHILOSOPHY．THESECONDCHAPTERANALYZESTHEFOURHERMENEUTICLEVELSOFTHEHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYOFGONGYANGSTUDY．THESPRINGANDAUTUMNANNALS’GONGYANGSTUDYISCLASSICALHERMENEUTICS．INTHECOURSEOFFORMINGSPECULATIVEHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYFROMTHESCHOLIUMOFSPRINGANDAUTUMNANNAB，F(xiàn)OURHERMENEUTICLEVELSEVENT，TEXT，PRINCIPLE，MEANINGCAMEINTOBEING．WHILEANALYZINGTHEFOURLEVELS，THECHAPTERPOINTSOUTTHATTHEHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYOFGONGYANGSTUDYAGREEDWITHTHEMODEMWESTERNANALYTICALHISTORICALPHILOSOPHY,ESPECIALLYOILTHECONSIDERATIONSABOUTHISTORICEVENTANDHISTORICTEXT．THETHIRDCHAPTERINTERPRETSITSDESTINYINTHEACADEMICHISTORYFROMTHEHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYPROPERTYOFGONGYANGSTUDY．ACCORDINGTOTHISCHAPTER,GONGYANGSTUDYISAKINDOFHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYOFGRANDNARRATIVEWHILE

簡介：中文摘要中文摘要牟宗三認為歷史是文化生命的曲折發(fā)展，因此他在其歷史哲學中以歷史為載體對中國文化生命的過去及未來做了一哲學的省察，并希望通過這一省察找出中西文化生命異質(zhì)之處，由此探索出一條中國文化生命的現(xiàn)代化道路。牟宗三認為中國文化生命之所以不同于西方文化生命，全因為中國文化生命之背后為一“綜合的盡理之精神“，其表現(xiàn)方式為“理性的運用表現(xiàn)“。而西方文化生命背后為一“分解的盡理之精神“，其表現(xiàn)方式為“理性的架構(gòu)表現(xiàn)“?，F(xiàn)代化之科學與民主唯有通過在“理性的架構(gòu)表現(xiàn)“下形成一“對列之局一方可實現(xiàn)。而中國只有“理性的運用表現(xiàn)“，無法開出“對列之局“，故中國之文化生命開不出民主與科學。以往之中國文化生命，雖無民主與科學，然因其以儒學為主流，故在儒家的德治下仍可實現(xiàn)一治權(quán)的民主來暫時維持天下之太平，但歷史亦因此而不得不停滯于一治一亂的循環(huán)中。而若要結(jié)束這一治亂循環(huán)之局，唯有通過“理性的運用表現(xiàn)”轉(zhuǎn)出“理性的架構(gòu)表現(xiàn)0從而實現(xiàn)政權(quán)的民主，此即中國文化生命之現(xiàn)代化。牟宗三認為既然儒家是中國文化生命之主流，其兩千多年來一直主導著中國文化生命的發(fā)展，因此實現(xiàn)中國文化的現(xiàn)代化的使命，亦該由儒家來肩負。而牟宗三認為儒家若要實現(xiàn)中國文化現(xiàn)代化的使命，必須走一條“內(nèi)圣開新外王一的道路。中國文化生命唯如此才能實現(xiàn)傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代化的完美融合，從而向更遠處發(fā)展。關(guān)鍵詞牟宗三；歷史；文化生命；綜合的盡理之精神；分解的盡理之精神些些些LIYIIIII／11194LLLILLLL／LLLLLL／OHILLLOLLLL矬LL1L■宣I疊III萱■IIIIIIIIIII萱IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII葺、，J。衛(wèi)OABSTRACTMOUTSUNGSANCONSIDEREDTHATHISTORYISTHEDEVELOPMENTOFCULTURE．SOHISPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYISTOINTROSPECTTHEHISTORYANDCULTUREOFCHINAINPHILOSOPHY．ANDHOPESTOFMDTHEDIFFERENCESBETWEENCHINESEANDWESTERNCULTURE．MONCONSIDEREDTHATTHEDIFFERENCESBE伽EENCHINESEANDWESTERNCULTURECOMEDFORM’’THESPIRITOFCOMPREHENSIVE”’S”RATIONALU∞OF弦FFORMANCE¨OFCHINESECULTUREAND”THESPIRITOFDECOMPOSITION¨‘S¨RATIONALFRAMEWORKFORPERF1O肌鋤CE¨OFWESTEUMCULTURE．MODEMSCIENCEANDDEMOCRACYCALLBEFORMEDFORMANTAGONISTICRELATIONSHIPWHICHISONLYFORMEDBYTHE”RATIONALFRAMEWORKPERFPORMANCE“．CHINACAN’TFORMITSMODEMSCIENCEANDDEMOCRACYBECAUSETHATTHEREISNO¨RATIONALFRAMEWORKPERFPORMANCE¨INCHINA．EVENSOPUBLICSECURITYISALSOGOODINANCIENTCHINA．THATBACANSEOFTHEMORALPOLITICSOFCONFUCIANWHICHISTHEMAINSTREAMOFCHINESECULTURE．BUTALSOBECAUSEOFTHIS，THEREISNOLASTINGPEACEINCHINA．SOCHINACULTUREHASTORELEASE”THESP疏OFDECOMPOSITION”FROM”THESPIRITOFCOMPREHENSIVE¨,TOSTEERTHE‘RATIONALUSEOFPERFORMANCE’TOTHE’RATIONALFRAMEWORKFORPERFORMANCE”．MONCONSIDERDTHATTHISCANBEMADEINTHEWAYCALLED“INTERNALSAINTNEWEXTERNALKING’WHICHCANONLYBECOMPLETEDBYCONFUCIAN．THENCHINESECULTURECANHAVEITSKEYWORDSMOUTSUNGSAN|HISTORY；CULTURELIFE；THESPIRITOFCOMPREHENSIVE；THEN

簡介：學校代碼三旦量塑分類號KO研究生學號蝗QQ量QQ§至Q§墊密級玉東北知≯葒大謄碩士學位論文歷史哲學的語言掌轉(zhuǎn)向一一解讀海登懷特的元史學十九世紀歐洲的歷史想像THELINGUISTICTURNINPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYUNSCRAMBLE指導教師學科專業(yè)研究方向?qū)W位類型作者侯星麗周鞏固教授歷史學史學理論與史學史學歷碩士東北師范大學學位評定委員會2007年5月ABSTRACTISTHEWORKMADEHAYDENWHITEBECOMETHECELEBRATED，THEREPUTATIONINTHE20THCENTURYNEXTHALFMOSTIMPORTANTPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYWORK，ALSOISTHESYMBOLOF“THELINGUISTICSTURN”INTHECONTEMPORARYWESTPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYRESEARCH．THEWHITEBELIEVEDTHAT，THEREISNOGAPWHICHCLEARLYBREAKSBETWEEN‘HISTORY’’AND“POEM”，ANYHISTORYWORKHASALLCONTAINEDONEKINDOFINDEPTHSTRUCTURE，ITISTHEPOEMSTUDY,INTHEESSENCEALSOISTHELINGUISTICS，ANDITISONEKINDMODELWHICHACCEPTSWITHOUTCRITIQUE．THEAUTHORCONSTRUCTSTHESTRUCTURALISMTEXTANALYSISTHEORYUSINGTHEFORMALISMMETHOD，SIMULTANEOUSLYPAYSGREATATTENTIONTOTHEIMPLEMENTATIONOFHISTORYPRINCIPLETHOUGHT，ANDHASANALYZEDEIGHTPRESENTATIVEHISTORYTHINKERINTHE19THCENTURYONEBYONEWITHTHESATIRIZINGLIKEANALOGYSTRATEGY,HADDEMONSTRATEDTOTHEREADERTHELEADERSHIPANALOGYWAYANDTHELANGUAGERULEWHICHACCOMPANIESINTHEHISTORICALWRITINGS．THISARTICLEISPRECISELYTHECOMPREHENSIONINVIEWOFTHISMONOGRAPH，AFTERHASANALYZEDTHEORIGINOFHAYDENWHITE’STHEORY,STUDIEDTHE19THCENTURYEUROPEMAINSTREAMHISTORYTHOUGHTPATTERNWHICHWHITEHADDESCRIBEDACCORDINGTOTHEWRITINGORDER,HASANALYZEDTHEINTRINSICMACHINEMADEANDTHEEXTERNALCAUSEOF”THELINGUISTICSTURN”INTHEPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORY,ANDDISSERTATEDTHESIGNIFICANCEANDINSUFFICIENTOF”THELINGUISTICSTURN”．KEYWORDPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORY；METAHISTORY；LINGUISTICTURNLI

簡介：密級學校代碼10075分類號學號20100003哲學碩士學位論文盧梭歷史哲學思想研究學位申請人符貞松指導教師許春華教授學位類別哲學碩士學科專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學授予單位河北大學答辯日期二○一三年六月

簡介：分類號密級公開刪㈣單位代碼學‘號篆力番SHANDONGUNIVERSITYI0422201511165碩士學位論文THESISFORMASTERDEGREE涂踅題亂歷史實在與歷史表現(xiàn)海登懷特歷史哲學再思考HISTORICAIENTITYANDHISTORICAIREPRESENTATIONRETHINI‘INGHAYDENWHITE’SHISTORICALPHILOSOPHY作者姓名培養(yǎng)單位專業(yè)名稱●指導教師合導師面歷史文化學院中國史鄭群副教授201年5周24園，紗原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學位論文，是本人在導師的指導下，獨立進行研究所取得的成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本論文不包含任何其他個人或集體己經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的科研成果。對本文的研究作出重要貢獻的個人和集體，均己在文中以明確方式標明。本聲明的法律責任由本人承擔。論文作者簽名強鎏醢日關(guān)于學位論文使用授權(quán)的聲明本人完全了解山東大學有關(guān)保留、使用學位論文的規(guī)定，同意學校保留或向國家有關(guān)部門或機構(gòu)送交論文的復印件和電子版，允許論文被查閱和借閱；本人授權(quán)山東大學可以將本學位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進行檢索，可以采用影印、縮印或其他復制手段保存論文和匯編本學位論文。保密論文在解密后應遵守此規(guī)定論文作者簽名磋衄導師簽名

簡介：廈門大學碩士學位論文盧卡奇歷史哲學思想研究姓名顧成東申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學指導教師吳開明20090501盧卡奇歷史哲學思想研究ABSTRACTASADOMAINOFPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORY,THEPAPERSTUDIEDLUKACS’SPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYTHOUGHTSINCHRONOLOGICALORDER．INACCORDANCEWITHTHEPRINCIPLEOFHISTORICALMETHODSANDLOGICALAPPROACHCONSISTENCY,THEPAPERDIVIDEDLUKACS’SPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYTHOUGHTSINTOEARLYPERIODANDLATERPERIODANDSTUDIEDSEPARATELY．ASTHEORIGINOFTHEPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYTHOUGHTS，IN”SOULANDFORM“AND“THEORYOFTHENOVEL“，LUKAESEXPRESSEDHISVIEWSOFPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYFORTHEFIRSTTIME,INCLUDINGRELATIONSHIPBETWEENHISTORYANDNATURE,ROLEOFSPIRITUALEXPERIENCEINUNDERSTANDING,SPECIFICSUBJECTIVETRUTHASWELL嬲CONCEPTOFTOTALITY．ONTHISBASIS，IN”HISTORYANDCLASSCONSCIOUSNESSN，LUKAESEXPLAINEDHISEARLYYEARSPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYTHOUGHTSSYSTEMATICALLY,INCLUDINGHISTORYRESEARCHMETHODS，MEANINGOFHISTORY,HISTORYSTATUS，HISTORYPROMOTIONPOWER,STNLCTUREOFHISTORYUNDERSTANDINGASWELLASTOTALITYCATEGORY．THETHOUGHTSWERECOMPROMISEBETWEENSPECULATIVEPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYANDANALYTICPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORY,BEINGOFMANYNONMARXISTFACTORS．INHISLATERYEARS，LUKACSEXPERIENCEDACRITICALREFLECTIONIN”EXISTENTIALISMORMARXISM“，”THEYOUNGHEGEL”ANDTHEDESTRUCTIONOFREASON什，ELIMINATEDBOURGEOISPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYANDITSMETHODOLOGY,ANDESTABLISHEDMARXISTPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYANDMETHODOLOGY．ONTHEBASISOFTHEONTOLOGY,IN”O(jiān)NTHEONTOLOGYOFSOCIALEXISTENCE”，LUKACSCONSTRUCTEDHISOWNPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORY,INCLUDINGHISTORYOBJECTIVITY,SOCIALATTRIBUTESOFHISTORY,TOTALITYOFHISTORY,REGULARITYOFHISTORY,PURPOSEANDPROGRESSOFHISTORY,DRIVINGFORCEINHISTORICALDEVELOPMENT,UNDERSTANDINGHISTORYINPRACTICE，METHODSOFUNDERSTANDINGHISTORY,NATUREOFUNDERSTANDINGHISTORYANDNATUREOFHISTORYKNOWLEDGEANDSOON．THETHOUGHTSSUBLATEDBOTHSPECULATIVEPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYANDANALYTICPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORY，WITHOBVIOUSCHARACTERISTIESOFMARXISM．T11CDOMAINOFPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYBREAKTHROUGHSITSNARROWANDSINGLEFIELDOFVISIONINTHEPAST．INTHISVISION,LUKACS’SSPECIFICANDRICHCONTENTSOFPHILOSOPHYOFHISTORYTHOUGHTSAPPEARINFRONTOFUS，WHICHTELLUSTHEDEVELOPMENTANDCHANGESOFLUKACS’STHOUGHTSINTHINKINGPROCESS，HAVINGALLIMPORTANTSIGNIFICANCEFORSTUDYOFⅡ

簡介：中圖分類號UDC學校代碼10055密級公開瘤羽大學博士學位論文歷史與現(xiàn)實之間的政治思考司馬光政治哲學研究POLITICALTHOUGHTBETWEENHISTORYANDREALITYSIMAGUANG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHY答辯委員會主席圃掛翅指導教師堊正塾援南開大學研究生院二。一。年五月南開大學學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學位論文，是本人在導師指導下進行研究工作所取得的研究成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本學位論文的研究成果不包含任何他人創(chuàng)作的、已公開發(fā)表或者沒有公開發(fā)表的作品的內(nèi)容。對本論文所涉及的研究工作做出貢獻的其他個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標明。本學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明的法律責任由本人承擔。學位論文作者簽名翌焦洼2010年6月8日非公開學位論文標注說明根據(jù)南開大學有關(guān)規(guī)定，非公開學位論文須經(jīng)指導教師同意、作者本人申請和相關(guān)部門批準方能標注。未經(jīng)批準的均為公開學位論文，公開學位論文本說明為空白。論文題目申請密級口限制≤2年口秘密≤10年口機密≤20年保密期限20審批表編號年月日至20年月日批準日期20年月日限制★2年最長2年，可少于2年秘密AIO年最長5年，可少于5年機密A20年最長10年，可少于10年