無獨立請求權(quán)第三人：基礎、比較及實證.pdf

1、南昌大學碩士學位論文無獨立請求權(quán)第三人：基礎、比較及實證姓名：俞培淦申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：民事訴訟法學指導教師：涂書田20070110ABSTLACTABSTRACTInviewofthepopularconceptt魄themajoraimsoftheThirdPartywithoutIndependentClaimSystemisproceduraleconomyandproceduralguaranteethearticlest

2、artswiththediscussiononthesystem’Saims，puttingforwardthattheparticipationofthethirdpartydoesn’tinevitablyleadstoeconomywhileproceduralguaranteeistheinevitablerequirementofanyconcretecivilproceduralsystemSuchadiversifiedt

3、heoryhas110effectinrevealingtheessenceoftheSystemWeshouldset“avoidingthecontradictivejudgment’astheaim，SOastoprovideacorrectguidanceforsystemreformationOnthisfoundationthroughintroductiononcontextandoperationmechanism，th

4、earticlehasainvestigationontheThirdPartyPracticesystemexistedintheFederalCivilProcedureRules，andgivesaconcludethatasthegreatdifferenceinrelatedsystems，fundamentaltheoriesideaoflawsuit，theThirdPartyPracticecouldntbeourcho

5、iceThenthearticlehasadetailedintroductionontheAssociatingParticipationSysteminContinentalLegalcountriesFirstweprovetheexistenceofthefightbased攮艇牟I瓤thenputforwardtheconstructionofdualisticparticipationmodel：forobligationb

6、ased如ifdpartyusingthemutualinfluencecriteria；forright—basedthirdpartyusingtherightdirectioncriteria。Consideringtheconfusion011thenecessityandprobabilitythearticlehasadiscussiononthesystem’SimportanttheoreticalbasisPartic

7、ipationEffect，revealingitsproducingbackgroundanditsdifferencefromResJudicataassertingthattheassistedpartyshouldalsoberestrictedbytheparticipationeffectinrightbasedlitigation，thisconcludeexpandsthesubjectscopeofthepartici

8、pationeffectThearticlealsohasallexpoundingandresponsetotheargumentinforeigncountiesAimingtothecombinationofproceduralandactuallawthearticlehopestotestandimproveitstheorythroughanalysisonpracticalexampleAtthelastpartWelet