中菲南海爭(zhēng)端管轄權(quán)探究.pdf

1、渺淵淵學(xué)授代碼z10270分類弓：DF935學(xué)號(hào)：I525022|7夠腳范大誓碩士專業(yè)學(xué)位論文中菲南海爭(zhēng)端管轄權(quán)探究學(xué)院：蜇堂皇鑿籃堂院專業(yè)學(xué)位類別：洼建殞f法掌2專業(yè)領(lǐng)域：國(guó)隧法研究生姓名：矗晶晶指導(dǎo)教師：昱蘊(yùn)完成日期：2Q!Z生3縣AbstractShanghaiNormalUniversityMasterofPhilosophyAbstractThePhilippinesintheSouthChinaSeadispute，main

2、lyaroundthesovereigntyovertheislandsandreefsandseadelimitationdisputeThedisputebeganinearly1950sinPhilippines，USArmyignoredChinesesovereigntywithoutauthorizationwillbeopenrangeHuangyanislandAftermorethanhalfacenturythetw

3、ocountriesontheSouthChinaSeacontinuenegotiations，buthasnotachievedsubstantialresults，regardlessofChina’SPhilippinesalsodiscouraged，andmakethebehaviorofviolationofChinesesovereigntyToestablishalong—termandstablelegalmecha

4、nismfortheSouthChinaSeaissueistheonlywaytosolvetheSouthChinaSeaissue，butalsothecommonneedsofbothsidesMarch26，2013，PhilippinesunilaterallysubmittheSouthChinaSeadisputetotheinternationalmaritimelawcounandtheInternationalCo

5、urtofdesiretoforcearbitrationoftheSouthChinaSeadisputeAtthebeginningofApril2013，thePhilippinesintheSouthChinaSeadisputeisnotsubmiRedtotheInternationalTribunalforthe1awoftheseabutaccordingtotheprovisionsofthe’’UnitedNatio

6、nsConventiononthelawofthesea”，andattherequestofapartytothedisputeinPhilippines，intothedisputesettlementmechanismofarbitrationprocedureHowthenatureofthePhilippinesintheSouthChinaSeaissue，whetherPhilippinesCanbethePhilippi

7、nesintheSouthChinaSeadisputetotheInternationalTribunalforthelawofthesea，alltheselegalissuesneedtoberesolved，alltheseproblemsarecausedbytheapplicableobjectofcompulsorydisputesettlementmechanismisnotclearChinainsists：thees

8、senceofthePhilippinesarbitrationmattersispartoftheSouthChinaSeaIslandsterritorialsovereignty”beyondthescopeofconvention”，doesnotinvolvetheinterpretationorapplicationofthe”Convention”；isthetwocountriesthroughbilateraldocu

9、mentsandthe”SouthSea”Declarationontheconductofpartiesintheagreementtoresolvethedisputethroughnegotiation，PhilippinesPhilippinesunilaterallytherelevantdisputearbitrationinviolationofinternationallaw；eventhemattersproposed

10、byPhilippinesarbitrationinvolvingrelevant”Convention”interpretationorapplicationproblems，alsoconstituteapartofthePhilippinesmaritimedelimitationisindivisible，andChinesehasbeenbasedon”theConvention”theprovisionsinthe2006s

11、tatementtheiSSBeSinvolvedinmaritimedelimitationThedisputeexcludedarbitrationcompulsorydisputesettlementproceduresClearthejurisdictionoftheInternationalCourtofarbitration，theprovisionsoftheintemationalarbitrationtribunalt