《四庫全書總目》唐詩批評研究_36760.pdf

1、汕頭大學碩士學位論文《四庫全書總目》唐詩批評研究姓名：劉樹曉申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：@指導教師：@2010《四庫全書總目》唐詩批評研究IIAbstractSiKuQuanShuZongMu(TheAnnotatedCatalogueoftheEmper’sFourTreasures)compiledinQingDynastyisthemostillustriousbibliographicwkinChinesehisty.TheAnno

2、tatedCatalogueconsistsofcategiesclassifiedpreludessynopticbibliographyappraisingelabatingonmethantenthousmostimptantwksbefeQingDynastysystematicallyincludingliterarycriticismofcollectedwksanthologiesofwritersinTangDynast

3、ycriticismofTangPoetry.Ithashighlysignificantacademicvalues.WhereasinTheAnnotatedCataloguepoeticcriticismhasalwaysbeendrawingmuchcriticalattentioncriticismofTangPoetryinQingDynastyhasitsownacteristicsthushasestablishedit

4、sschoolofthought.FirstthisthesisistoreviewthestudyofTangPoetrybefeQingDynastyingeneral.ThenIwillfocusonspecificallythecriticismofTangPoetryinTheAnnotatedCataloguebyintroducinginthecontextofliteraryhistyofTangPoetrythecri

5、ticismofTangPoetryinQingDynastyinparticular.IwillmainlyapproachthecriticismofTangPoetryinTheAnnotatedCataloguebycomparingitwithcriticismsbyothercritics’inQingDynastyinotherdynastiesinthesametraditionofConfucianpoetics.Me

6、anwhileIwilltalkaboutthedebateofthestatusofTangPoetrySongPoetrythereconciliationofthetwoinlaterdynasties.MeoverIwilldiscussthecircumionofthestagesofTangPoetry.MyconclusionisthatliterarycriticismofTangDynastyinTheAnnotate

7、dCatalogueaccdswiththemainstreamofliterarycriticisminQingDynastyinthatitattemptstocombinethevariousschoolsofcriticismsinhistygiveaproperunbiasedobjectiveevaluationofTangPoetry.Secondthisthesisistoteaseouttheopinionsacter

8、isticsofthecriticismsofTangPoetryinTheAnnotatedCatalogue.Theyare:thepoliticsofwritingasaninitiativefconveyingtruthstheemphasisofpoeticsasafmofartofrefinementacterstronglyevidentantagonisttothefarfetchingauthialdefinition

9、ofTangPoetrybibliographicannotatedanamalgamoftextualresearchliterarycriticism.TheAnnotatedCatalogueiswidelyacknowledgedasaprodigiousprofoundmasterpieceeverproduced.Asanunprecedentedwkitalsoservesasabridgebetweentradition