心物區(qū)別的本體論辨析——解析戴維森附生性概念和反常一元論_第1頁(yè)
已閱讀1頁(yè),還剩55頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文心物區(qū)別的本體論辨析——解析戴維森附生性概念和反常一元論姓名:劉天楠申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:陳剛20080531華 中 科 技 大 學(xué) 碩 士 學(xué) 位 論 文 華 中 科 技 大 學(xué) 碩 士 學(xué) 位 論 文 IIAbstract In Donald Davidson’s famous paper “Mental Events” which causes widespread influenc

2、e, he used the term “supervenience” to discuss the mind-body relation, and then made the term “supervenience” become a rather important concept in philosophy of mind. Davidson help inspire a kind of nonreductive physical

3、ism. Among the opposing attitudes towards Davidson’s “supervenience” concept and anomalous monism, Jaegwon Kim’s critic proposition was the most severe. The antithesis of the notions between Davidson and Jaegwon Kim may

4、be the kernel in modern philosophy of mind. Their argument was caused by the deviation in understanding and defining the basic concepts related to the theories. On one hand, Davidson insisted on a kind of “event ontology

5、” which claimed that mental event and physical event as a case of token event is equivalent; on the other hand, he talked about the “supervenience” concept and non-strict mind-body law in the sense of type event. In this

6、 way, Davidson made it a little hard for people to understand his non-strict mind-body law and at the same time weakened the mental causation. In undertaking a philosophy study of Davidson’s supervenience concept and ano

7、malous monism, firstly, this paper wants to make the differentiation between his key concepts such as “token event and type event”, “mental event and physical event”, “singular causal relation and causal law”, and “stric

8、t law and non-strict law”. By way of this, it prepares to conduct a perception on base of ontological analysis, so as to indicate that Davidson’s change between token event and type event will cause much difficulty in ex

9、plaining mental causation. Finally, it attempts to expound that, in order to discuss “supervenience” and “nonreducibility” between mental event and physical event (as token event), entailing event a substantial position

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論