觀念之于痛苦：路易斯論痛苦問題

1、 原 創(chuàng) 性 聲 明 本人鄭重聲明： 本人所呈交的學(xué)位論文， 是在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下獨立進行研究所取得的成果。學(xué)位論文中凡引用他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或未發(fā)表的成果、數(shù)據(jù)、觀點等，均已明確注明出處。 除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外， 不包含任何其他個人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的科研成果。對本文的研究成果做出重要貢獻的個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標(biāo)明。 本聲明的法律責(zé)任由本人承擔(dān)。 論文作者簽名：

2、 日 期： 關(guān)于學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)的聲明 關(guān)于學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)的聲明 本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下所完成的論文及相關(guān)的職務(wù)作品，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)歸屬蘭州大學(xué)。本人完全了解蘭州大學(xué)有關(guān)保存、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，同意學(xué)校保存或向國家有關(guān)部門或機構(gòu)送交論文的紙質(zhì)版和電子版， 允許論文被查閱和借閱； 本人授權(quán)蘭州大學(xué)可以將本學(xué)位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進行檢索， 可以采用任何復(fù)制手段保存和匯編本學(xué)位論文。 本人離校后發(fā)表、 使用

3、學(xué)位論文或與該論文直接相關(guān)的學(xué)術(shù)論文或成果時，第一署名單位仍然為蘭州大學(xué)。 本學(xué)位論文研究內(nèi)容： □可以公開 □不宜公開，已在學(xué)位辦公室辦理保密申請，解密后適用本授權(quán)書。 （請在以上選項內(nèi)選擇其中一項打“√” ） 論文作者簽名： 導(dǎo)師簽名： 日 期： 日 期：

4、 √ II The Meaning of Human’s Sense for Pain: C S Lewis’ Views on the Problem of Pain Abstract There is no consistent philosophical view concerning the nature of pain. Just about every conceivable position concerning the

5、nature of pain is held by some leading thinker. Many philosophers concerned some broad issues of pain, i.e. what causes it, how to look on and avoid it. Their views are few systematically concerning the nature of pain, u

6、nfortunately, especially the metaphysical questions of what is actually the pain of human, why pain is consequentially caused by something of human, and whether the pain only leads to a bad feeling and result or not. The

7、 aim of this thesis is trying to ponder over the nature of human’s pain. Here the author regards two focus questions of what determines the pain of human and how those things make the pain possible to human as the beginn

8、ing of the discussion on the basis of critical review of some conceivable positions of previous philosophers in history. Because C S Lewis deals with the problem of pain in a systemic way, his core arguments may help the

9、 author understanding the nature of human’s pain. In order to avoid the influence caused by his position of Christianity, the author accomplishes the whole thinking process about the nature of human’s pain in a dialogue

10、way based on C S Lewis’ relative argument text. What is the nature of human’s pain? How does the nature work leading human suffer the bad feeling endlessly? A possible answer for the two questions may be the inherent bli

11、ndness of human due to his native limitation. The attributes of human’s pain could be unified when we argue the insight of that pain is a well-timed reflection of the limitation of human as his going into any action duri

12、ng the process of life. Then it could come very naturally of that the positive meaning of pain warning the limitation of human. The limitation of human may be the origin of his pain and it may also be the causation how h