版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文孔子和柏拉圖政治哲學(xué)之比較姓名:王利軍申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):馬克思主義哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:尹雪萍20070513IIAbstract We cannot talk over the individual problems of morality purely, because the contact between any individual and state is so intimate. Any philos
2、ophy about human action is some kind of “Political” Philosophy to a great extent. Facing the same social history, Confucius and Plato, who act as the inheritors and innovators in Western and Chinese cultures, bring forwa
3、rd their own political thoughts. They all try to organize a “greatly harmonious society” or “Republic” based on the policy of public ownership, in which there are no social stratum and exploitation. They advocate the rul
4、er should be a “worthy” or “philosophy-king”. But there exist many differences. In the historical context of State-Family Integration, giving emphasis to blood ties and ethical order, Confucius’s main object is to establ
5、ish an “Ethical Country”. In ancient Greek, it is equal, independent and free between individuals. Justice is the thread of the Republic. Plato describes a happy and harmonious society by discussing justice of state and
6、individuals. To Plato, justice of state means that every class abides by its order and fulfills its duties. Individual justice means the harmony of individual soul. It regulates individuals to control and restrain themse
7、lves in their soul and do every thing right. Compared with the ethical country of Confucius, Plato seeks to establish a “Moral State”. In the development of Western philosophy, the important categories of human and God a
8、lways occupy a predominate position. The philosophy of Plato asserts ideal forms as an absolute and eternal reality of which the phenomena of the world are an imperfect and transitory reflection. Consequently, it causes
9、the earth and heaven to be in conflicting and contrasting positions. Confucius bases his philosophy upon the world, not upon the heaven, and goes beyond it. He wants to harmonize the world and the heaven. Key words: Poli
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 孔子和柏拉圖政治哲學(xué)之比較.pdf
- 孔子與柏拉圖政治倫理思想之比較
- 柏拉圖與孔子政治倫理思想之比較研究.pdf
- 孔子和柏拉圖教育哲學(xué)思想比較研究
- 柏拉圖與亞里士多德政治哲學(xué)之比較
- 柏拉圖與亞里士多德政治哲學(xué)之比較.pdf
- 孔子和柏拉圖教育哲學(xué)思想比較研究.pdf
- 柏拉圖與孟子倫理政治思想之比較
- 柏拉圖與孟子倫理政治思想之比較.pdf
- 老子哲學(xué)和孔子哲學(xué)比較研究
- 阿爾法拉比和柏拉圖哲學(xué)及社會(huì)政治思想比較
- 秩序與和諧的追尋——孔子與柏拉圖和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)想之比較
- 老子哲學(xué)和孔子哲學(xué)比較研究.pdf
- 阿爾法拉比和柏拉圖哲學(xué)及社會(huì)政治思想比較.pdf
- 秩序與和諧的追尋——孔子與柏拉圖和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)想之比較.pdf
- 孔子政治哲學(xué)探析
- 孔子與柏拉圖知識(shí)觀比較研究
- 從理想性政治哲學(xué)到現(xiàn)實(shí)性政治哲學(xué)——柏拉圖政治哲學(xué)研究
- 柏拉圖與亞里士多德的政治哲學(xué)思想比較
- 孔子與柏拉圖知識(shí)觀比較研究.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論