關(guān)聯(lián)公司人格混同的案例分析——以徐工機(jī)械公司訴川交工貿(mào)公司等買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同案為例.pdf

1、法律碩士專(zhuān)業(yè)學(xué)位論文關(guān)聯(lián)公司人格混同的案例分析關(guān)聯(lián)公司人格混同的案例分析————以徐工機(jī)械公司訴川交工貿(mào)公司等買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同案為例以徐工機(jī)械公司訴川交工貿(mào)公司等買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同案為例作者姓名：何金香指導(dǎo)教師：李向彬西南政法大學(xué)SouthwestUniversityofPoliticalScienceLaw1AbstractRelatedpartytransactionisengagedineconomicexchangesbetweenrelated

2、partiesitisa“doubleedgedswd“whichcanproducecertainpositiveimpactontheeconomicrelations.Duetothefrequenteconomicexchangesbetweenassociates.Theycanfmfullunderstingtrust.withthetrustassociatescanreducethetransactionprocedur

3、esimproveefficiency.Sothefairaffiliatedtransactionsisagoodthingfrelatedparties.Buttheonepartyofthetransactionsmayhavetheabilitytocontroltheotherassociatedidealsothattheotherassociatedmaylosetheirindependencethenitwillpro

4、duceunfairrelatedtransactions.unfairrelatedtransactionsarenotjusthurttheinterestsoftherelatedpartythecreditsitevendisruptthemarketder.Inpracticebecausetherelatedpartytransactionisdifferentfromthegeneraltransactionsomepeo

5、plewanttogetexcessprofittheywillhavedifferentagendastousethecrelationrelationshipofunfairtrade.Therefehowtousethecurrentlegaltoregulatetheunfairrelatedpartytransactionswhichhasveryimptantsignificance.Inthispaperwiththehe

6、lpoftheguidecasethispaperanalysisassociatedcompanypersonalitymixofacknowledgmentapplicablelaw.Excepttheintroductiontherearemainlythreeparts:Thefirstpartisintroducecasethenleadstocontroversiallegalissues.therearethreemain

7、problems:thefirstishowtoidentifytheAssociateCompanypersonalityconfusionthesecondisWhatisthelegalbasistoderChuanJiaoIndustrialTradingCompanyRuiLucompanyjointlyseverallyliabletopaythedebtsofSichuanIndustrialTradingCompany；

8、thethreeisshouldnotrulingthreeWangYongLicompanysactualcontrollerofjointseveralliability.Thesecondpartistoanalyzethecaseofthreeissues.Firstlydefinedtheconnotationofassociatedcompaniestheconceptofpersonalityconfusionfromth

9、epersonalityconfusionwhethertheanalysisoftheconstitutiverequirementsofthecasecompanyconstitutesaffiliatecompanypersonalityconfusionThenfromtheperspectiveoftheuseofthelegalpersonpersonalitydenialsystemrequirementsanalysis