從柏拉圖到黑格爾文藝美學中的悖論幽靈

1、南京師范大學碩士學位論文從柏拉圖到黑格爾:文藝美學中的悖論幽靈姓名：顧星欣申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：中國語言文學；文藝學指導教師：駱冬青2009-04-25Abstract IIAbstract Paradox refers to “self-contradictory statements“. Paradox is the hadden clues in the history of western aesthetics，and is

2、the framework of much aesthetic theory. The reason of pafadox is the struggle between the apriorism and dialectics. This is reflected in the theory of three philosophers: Plato, Kant, and Hegel. Firstly, Plato divids the

3、 world into two parts, and this causees he can’t be self-consistent becasuse the apriorism surpasses the dialectics in his theory; Secondly, Kant pointed out that the solution of the paradox is to make the positive and n

4、egative side of the antinomy to be true or false simultaneously. At last, Hegel uses contradictory dialectics to prove that the apriorism could be right, but he can not solute the paradox. The conclusion comes from three

5、 parts: At first,we must insist on the holly apriorism; secondly, the new aesthetics dialectics could be built on the combination of dialectics and aesthetics; At last, there’re something we need to pay attention to. An