小額訴訟當(dāng)事人程序權(quán)保障研究.pdf

1、分類(lèi)號(hào)UDC舢刪埸H1大譬YANGZHOUUNIVEI岱ITY碩士學(xué)位論文(全日制學(xué)術(shù)學(xué)位)小額訴訟當(dāng)事人程序權(quán)保障研究楊景學(xué)號(hào)叢!Q!圣壘密級(jí)——指導(dǎo)教師姓名：魚(yú)疊霞割鏊撞：揚(yáng)劌盤(pán)堂，婆菱揚(yáng)劌：225QQ窆申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：亟學(xué)科專(zhuān)業(yè)名稱：監(jiān)墜鎏堂論文提交日期：2Q!墨生旦15旦論文答辯日期：2Q!墨生魚(yú)月2旦學(xué)位授予單位：揚(yáng)必盤(pán)堂學(xué)位授予日期：2Q!晝生魚(yú)月三Q旦答辯委員會(huì)主席：夏疊塞塾撞2018年6月IIAbstractInorder

2、toincreasetheefficiencyoflitigation，reducethecostsoflitigation，allowthejudiciarytobeapproachedbythegeneralpublic，andeasethecourt’S“case_to—case’’litigationpressure，smallscalelitigationprocedureshaveemergedHowever，thereis

3、acertaindeviationinthefunctionsettingofthesmall—scalelitigationprocedureinChina’Scurrentcivillitigationlegislation，ignoringtheprotectionofsomeminimumproceduralrightsofthelitigantandaffectingtheapplicationoftheprocedureTh

4、esmall—sumlitigationprocedurehasalowapplicationrateinjudicialpracticeandfacesthesituationofbeing”imposed”Theauthorbelievesthatthelegislatorsaremainlyfiomtheperspectiveofcourttxials，positioningtheirmainfunctionsasraisingt

5、heefficiencyoflitigationandrelievingtrialpressuresarethecruxofthestatusquoofsmallsumlitigationproceduresThisarticlefocusesontheanalysisofthestatusquoandexistingproblemsofproceduralsafeguardsforsmalllitigantsThroughempfii

6、calresearchandcomparativeanalysis，thispaperanalyzesthereasonsforthelackofproceduralsafeguardsforsmalllitigants，andproposeswaystoimprovetheproceduralsafeguardsforsmalllitigantsThebasiccriteriathatshouldbefollowed，thebasic

7、，necessaryproceduralrightsofthesmalllitigants，andthesupportingmeasuresforimprovingtheproceduralsafeguardsofthelitigantsinsmallclaimsshouldbegivenThisarticleisdividedintofiveparts：Thefustpartanalyzesthedevelopmentstatusan

8、dexistingproblemsoftheproceduralsafeguardsofthelitigantsinsmall—scalelitigationinChinaAfterresearching，itfindsthatmanyaspectsofthelitigiousproceduralrightprotectionareimperfect，suchasinsufficientprotectionofthefighttocho

9、osetheprocedureandtheparticipationoftheprocedureRightshavebeenweakened，insufficientprotectionofproceduralremedies，etc；Thesecondpart：reviewingthevalueorientationofthesmall—sumlitigationprocedure，reviewingtheproblemsinthel

10、egislationandpracticeofsmallsumlitigation，andanalyzingthereasonsforthelackoftheproceduralsafeguardofthelitigantsinthesmall—sumlitigation；Thethirdpart：itdiscussesthetheoreticalbasisforguaranteeingtherightofproceduralright