雅各布作文評(píng)分量表

1、雅各布作文評(píng)分量表 雅各布作文評(píng)分量表(Jacobs et al. 1981)Descriptors Score Level Criteria30-27Excellent to very good: knowledgeable * substantive * thorough development of thesis * relevant to assigned topic26-22Good to average: some know

2、ledge of subject * adequate range * limited development of thesis * mostly relevant to topic, but lacks detail21-17 Fair to poor: limited knowledge of subject * little substance * inadequate development of topic? Knowled

3、geable? Substantive? Thorough development of thesis? Relevant to assigned topicCONTENT16-13 Very poor: does not show knowledge of subject * non-substantive * not pertinent * OR not enough to evaluate20-18Excellent to ve

4、ry good: fluent expression * ideas clearly stated/supported * succinct * well-organized * logical sequencing * cohesive17-14Good to average: somewhat choppy * loosely organized but main ideas stand out * limited support

5、* logical but incomplete sequencing13-10 Fair to poor: nonfluent * ideas confused or disconnected * lacks logical sequencing and development? Fluent expression? Ideas clearly stated/ supported? Succinct? Well-organized?

6、 Logical sequencing? Cohesive ORGANIZATION9-7 Very poor: does not communicate * no organization * OR not enough to evaluate20-18Excellent to very good: sophisticated range * effective word/idiom choice and usage * word f

7、orm mastery * appropriate register17-14 Good to average: adequate range * occasional errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage but meaning not obscured13-10 Fair to poor: limited range * frequent errors of word/idiom form

8、, choice, usage * meaning confused or obscured? Sophisticated range? Effective word/idiom choice and usage? Word form mastery? Appropriate registerVOCABULARY9-7Very poor: essentially translation * little knowledge of En

9、glish vocabulary, idioms, word form * OR not enough to evaluate? Effective complex constructions? Agreement? Tense? Number? Word order / USE25-22Excellent to very good: effective complex constructions * few errors of a

10、greement, tense, number, word order /function, articles, pronouns, prepositions21-18 Good to average: effective but simple constructions * minor problems in complex constructions * several errors of agreement, tense, num

11、ber, word order /function, articles, pronouns, prepositions but meaning seldom obscured17-11 Fair to poor: major problems in simple/complex constructions * frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number, word orde

12、r/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions and/or fragments, run-ons, deletions * meaning confused or obscuredfunctionLANGUAGE10-5Very poor: virtually no mastery of sentence construction rules * dominated by errors * d

13、oes not communicate * OR not enough to evaluate5Excellent to very good: demonstrates mastery of conventions * few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing4Good to average: occasional errors of

14、spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing but meaning not obscured3Fair to poor: frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing * poor handwriting * meaning confused or obscured? Spellin

15、g? Punctuation? Capitalization? Paragraphing? Handwriting MECHANICS2Very poor: no mastery of conventions * dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing * handwriting illegible * OR not e