試論我國(guó)的信訪制度.pdf

1、試論我國(guó)的信訪制度1試論我國(guó)的信訪制度試論我國(guó)的信訪制度中文摘要隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的加速，利益結(jié)構(gòu)重組，諸多潛伏在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型過渡期的矛盾逐步激化和顯現(xiàn)，因此作為社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的安全閥、利益調(diào)節(jié)工具的信訪形勢(shì)也隨之嚴(yán)峻。完善信訪制度，妥善處理人民內(nèi)部矛盾，健全由黨和政府主導(dǎo)的旨在維護(hù)社會(huì)公平、群眾權(quán)益的司法、行政機(jī)制，成為人民群眾的共同心愿，也是改革發(fā)展的重要前提嚴(yán)峻復(fù)雜的信訪形勢(shì)為社會(huì)科學(xué)研究者提出了時(shí)代的命題。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的信訪機(jī)構(gòu)仍處于過渡階段，

2、其運(yùn)作機(jī)制的特點(diǎn)在于逐漸明確自身運(yùn)作原則的情況下，形成了齊抓共管的大格局，但我國(guó)信訪制度存在的問題仍不能忽視：信訪內(nèi)容廣泛復(fù)雜，信訪機(jī)構(gòu)效能太弱，信訪當(dāng)事人的對(duì)抗性不斷增強(qiáng)。造成這一局面的原因有：社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期矛盾突出，多種利益沖突亟待調(diào)和；信訪體制不順，信訪機(jī)構(gòu)龐雜，歸口不一；信訪機(jī)構(gòu)功能錯(cuò)位，使信訪帶有“人治”色彩。信訪制度在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期中顯現(xiàn)出的各種困境，表明信訪制度的改革勢(shì)在必行、舉足輕重。當(dāng)前關(guān)于信訪改革的爭(zhēng)論中比較有影響力的有“強(qiáng)

3、化論與弱化論”，“強(qiáng)化論”主張重新構(gòu)建信訪體系框架，并通過立法統(tǒng)一規(guī)范信訪工作擴(kuò)大信訪機(jī)構(gòu)的權(quán)力，但對(duì)擴(kuò)大權(quán)力后的信訪部門的監(jiān)督又成為一個(gè)新的問題?！叭趸摗敝鲝埑蜂N不同行政系統(tǒng)內(nèi)的信訪機(jī)構(gòu)，把信訪全部集中到各級(jí)人民代表大會(huì)，專門機(jī)構(gòu)專職處理并對(duì)信訪事項(xiàng)肩負(fù)全部責(zé)任，以加強(qiáng)信訪系統(tǒng)的一致性和協(xié)調(diào)性，但是其缺陷在于本身信訪部門的權(quán)力就有限，如果再繼續(xù)給其權(quán)力弱化下去，群眾所反映的問題若信訪部門都無法督辦完成，只會(huì)造成一種群眾重復(fù)上訪，基層

4、不停接訪，但問題卻還不能解決的惡性循環(huán)中，所以同樣不可取?！皬U除論與改善論”中“廢除論”觀點(diǎn)明顯偏激，即認(rèn)為信訪制度的存在只能削弱我國(guó)的法治權(quán)威和國(guó)家的法制化進(jìn)程，沒有可取之處。本文作者的觀點(diǎn)即“改善論”，提倡對(duì)信訪制度進(jìn)行適當(dāng)?shù)母母?，努力修繕目前的體制問題，以循序漸進(jìn)的方式解決好不斷顯露出來的信訪矛盾，在維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定，國(guó)家安全，人民生活正常有序的前提條試論我國(guó)的信訪制度3isimperativeimptant.Amongthecurr

5、entargumentaboutthepetitionrefm“thetheyofdilutiontheenhanced”aremeinfluential.“Theenhanced”advocatestorebuildthepetitionframewkintegratetheinfmationresourcesofthepetitionexplethe“Petition“patternunifystardizethepetitionw

6、kbylegislationbutthesupervisiontothedepartmentwhosepowerisexpedhasbecomeanewproblem.“Thetheyofdilution”advocatestorepealthepetitionagenciesofeverydepartmentfocusallthepetitiontothePeoplesCongressatalllevelslettherepresen

7、tativesofthepeopleoverseethewkof“OneGovernmentTwoDepartments”indertostrengthenthesystematicnessharmonybutthedrawbackisthatthepowerofthepetitiondepartmentislimitediginallyifcontinuetoweakenitspowerdownitwillhavenorighttos

8、upervisetheproblemsreflectedbythemassesallofthesecanonlyfmsuchaviciouscyclethatthemasskeeppetitioningthegrassrootskeepreceiptingwiththeproblembeingsolvedonlybyrelyingontheleadershipsothistheyisundesirableequally.Asto“The

9、theyofabolitionimprovement”theopinionoftheabolitionwhothinksthattheexistenceofthepetitionsystemcanonlyweakenourcountryslegalauthityourcountryslegalizationprocessisobviouslyextremehasnoredeemingqualities.Theauthsviewis“th

10、etheyofimprovement”itadvocatestorefmthepetitionsystemappropriatelymakeefftstorepairthecurrentsystemsolvetheconstantlyexposedpetitioncontradictionstepbysteptopromotetherefmofthepetitionwithmaintainingsocialstabilitynation

11、alsecuritymakingpeopleliveanmallifewhichisalsothecurrentrefmsolutiontacitlyapprovedbythegovernment.Basedon“thetheyofimprovement“thisarticleproposedthebasicobjectivethedeeptargetofthepetitionrefmproposedthefollowingspecif

12、icways:innovatetheinternaloperationalmechanismofthepetitionsystemsuchasthetroubleshootingsystemtheinvestigatingsoonmakefulluseofthepetitioninfmationimplementthepragmaticpetitionagencies’operationalapproach:petitionagentp