政體新聞報(bào)道中語氣系統(tǒng)的人際功能——對(duì)比分析泰晤士報(bào)和中國日?qǐng)?bào).pdf

1、東北師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文政體新聞報(bào)道中語氣系統(tǒng)的人際功能——對(duì)比分析泰晤士報(bào)和中國日?qǐng)?bào)姓名：朱麗軒申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：外國語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：楊玉晨20050501AbstractBasedonthetheoreticalframeworkofHalliday’S‘。FunctionalGrammar”thisthesisventurestoinvestigatefunctionsofmoodinpoliticalnewsr

2、eportsItalsoattemptstoprovidesomeexplanationsastowhymoodappearsthewayasitisintwonewsresourcesAccordingtothestatisticaldataresemblanceisfoundbetweenthetwonewsresourceswithdeclarativesbeingdominantinboth，9797％intheTimesand

3、9652％inChinaDailyChinaDaily’Sare096timesofTheTimes’inrelativevaluewhichmeansnosignificancecanbefoundforthedifferencebetweenthetwonewsresourcesintermsofdeclarativesTheexplanationisthatthemaincommunicativepurposeofnewsisto

4、conveyinformation，whichisachievedmainlybydeclarativesWithinterrogativesexistinginboth，203％inThe’rimesand307％inChinaDailyChinaDaily’Sare1_51timesofTheTimes’inrelativevalueReaders’thinkingandcuriosityCanbearousedbyinterrog

5、atives，SOChinaDaily’SinteractionisstrongerthanTheTimes’NoimperativesarefoundinTheTimeswimonlyO41％inChinaDailyMoodrealizationsarestrikinglydifferentinthetwonewsresources111efrequencyofmodaloperatorsinChinaDailyismuchhighe

6、rthanTheTimes’077％inTheTimesand132％inChinaDailyandtherelativevalueofChinaDailyis171timesofTheTimes’Moreovermoodadjunctsalsoshowdivergence104％inTheTimesand129％inChinaDailyChinaDaily’Sbeing124timesofTheTimes’Finallynocomme

7、ntadjunctsarefoundinTheTimeswhileitoccupies0046％inChinaDailyTheanalysisofdatasuggeststhatpoliticalorientations，culturevalues，interpersonalfactorsandgatekeepers’manipulationmightbethereasonstocausethedifferencesAsawhole，C

8、hinaDailyismorecommunicativeanddistinctive，while111eTimesseemstobemoreobjectiveIntermsoftheresultofthecurrentresearchthewriterconcludesthatmoodsystemcontributestointerpersonalfunctionsofpoliticalnewsreportsThewriterhopes