10204.先秦儒法公私觀之比較研究(1)

1、學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明本人聲明所呈交的學(xué)位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作及取得的研究成果。據(jù)我所知，除了文中特別加以標(biāo)注和致謝的地方外，論文中不包含其他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果，也不包含為獲得直昌太堂或其他教育機(jī)構(gòu)的學(xué)位或證書而使用過的材料。與我一同工作的同志對本研究所做的任何貢獻(xiàn)均已在論文中作了明確的說明并表示謝意。學(xué)位論文作者簽名c瑚：切_779諺簽字日期砌鄉(xiāng)年6月7同學(xué)位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書本學(xué)位論文作者完全

2、了解南昌大學(xué)有關(guān)保留、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，有權(quán)保留并向國家有關(guān)部門或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的復(fù)印件和磁盤，允許論文被查閱和借閱。本人授權(quán)南昌大學(xué)可以將學(xué)位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進(jìn)行檢索，可以采用影印、縮印或掃描等復(fù)制手段保存、匯編本學(xué)位論文。同時(shí)授權(quán)中國科學(xué)技術(shù)信息研究所和中國學(xué)術(shù)期刊(光盤版)電子雜志社將本學(xué)位論文收錄到《中國學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫》和《中國優(yōu)秀博碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫》中全文發(fā)表，并通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)向社會(huì)公眾提供信息服務(wù)。(保

3、密的學(xué)位論文在解密后適用本授權(quán)書)學(xué)位論文作者簽名(手寫)：劫嘲揚(yáng)導(dǎo)師簽名(手寫)：羨，南罩簽字嗍劫睜‘月7日簽字同期：弘I≥年占月7同AbstractABSTRACTOutlookonthepublicandtheprivateinterestsiSaveryimportantareaofethics，itisaveryimportantcriterionofvalueinpeopledealwithsocialrelationsbe

4、tweenpeople，isalsooneofthemostimportantaspectsofthesocialrelatiOIlSThesenseofpublicandprivmeissuesrelatedtothedevelopmentofourcountry’Spolitical，economicandmoralvaluesystem，relatedtotheintegrationofsocialstructureAtfirst

5、，theideaofpublicandprivateandhasnomoralmeaning，simplyreflectsthedifferencebetweenthepublicandprivateButwhenthepartnershipofpublicandprivateisoppositeandconflictitwillcausetheattentionandconsiderationofpublicrelationsaswe

6、llastheproblemofgoodandevilpeopleTherefore，letthegoodandeviltofurtherlocalizethepublicandprivateconcepttocoordinatetherelationshipbetweenpeople，tegulatepeople’SbehaviornotonlytomaintainauthoritarianruleItisahistoricalnec

7、essityInChinesehistory，therearealotofviewaboutpublicandprivateDuetovariousreasons，theadvocacyaboutthepublicandtheprivateofConfucianismandLegalismbeforeQinDynastyisdifferentTheoutlookonthepublicandtheprivateofConfucianism

8、andLegalismdiscussedtherelationsbetweengroupandindividualthewholeandthepartofsocialandpoliticallifeintheWarringStatesperiod，theyemphasizethat“righteousness”，“publicinterest”，agreedtoprotectthepublicthanprivate，complieswi

9、ththeneedofdevelopmentoferaHowevercontributionstothetheoryofpublicandprivateConfucianismandLegalismoutlookisdifferent，theformermainlyinthefieldofethics，andputsforwardthegoalformoralcultivation，whilethe1attermainlyintheid

10、eologicalfieldprovidesthetheoreticalbasisfortheruleoflawPublicandprivateConfuciannotabsolute，andperformanceofthepreciouspeoplethisthought，andtheviewofpublicandprivate，publicandprivateabsoluteopposition，andfinallytotheabs

11、olutemonarchyThearticleismainlyfromConfucianismandLegalismconceptofpublicandprivatebackgroundofthetimes，theoreticalsources，aspublicandprivatemeaningstomakespecificanalysisofthedifferenceaboutthepublicandprivateofConfucia