產(chǎn)品責任精神損害賠償?shù)难芯?pdf

1、對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學法律碩士(JM)學位論文論文題目：產(chǎn)品責任精神損害賠償?shù)难芯恐黝}詞：產(chǎn)品責任、精神損害、產(chǎn)品缺陷研究生姓名：張雷導師姓名：董靈副教授寫作時間：2005年9月2006年3月ABSTRAC’11Productliabilityspiritdamages，whichplayanactiverolefortheprotectionofthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofconsumers。isani

2、mportantcomponentofproductresponsibilityChina’Sexistinglawsandregulationsonproductliabilityspiritdamageshavesomedeficiencies，mainlymanifestedasfollows：IthenarrowscopeofcompensationIIcompensationissometimestOOlowforvictim

3、sⅢheavyburdenofproofforvictimsInthelightoftheexistenceofthesedeficiencies，theexistinglawsandregulationsonproductliabilityspiritdamagescannotprovidetimelycomprehensive，effectivejudicialreliefforconsumerswhentheirlegitimat

4、erightsandinterests，especiallyatthemomentofmentalharm，aredamagedTheperfectofproductliabilitymoraldamagecompensationsystem，fortheprotectionofthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofconsumers，havepositivesignificanceInthespiritof

5、damagescasescausedbytheproductdeficiencies，thescopeofprotectionofconsumerinterestsandspiritualcompensationamountiscloselyconcernedtwoissuesbyconsumers，whichisalsothekeypointtofullyandeffectivelyprotectthelegitimateintere

6、stsofconsumersInthelightofscopeofprotectionofconsumers’spiritinterests，therelevantprovisionsofexistinglawsistoonarrowConsumerscanclaimforthespiritdamages，onlyifdeathordisabilitycausedbythedeficientproduct；andcannotclaimf

7、orthesamedamages，ifthedamageisjustcommonorordinaryTakingnoticeofthislawdeficienciesthescopeofprotectionofconsumersspiritinterestsshouldbeexpandedtosuchdegreeasvictimscanevidentthespiritdamagesasmuchaspossibleIntheissueof

8、amountofdamages，suchfactorsasviciousmaliceofabuseBthefaultofthevictim，theeconomicsituationoftheabuseretc，shouldbeconsideredThepurposeofdeterminingthisamountisbothcomfortthevictimsandpunishtheproducertopreventsucheventocc