一套非英語(yǔ)專業(yè)教材的評(píng)估方案——針對(duì)《大學(xué)英語(yǔ)（全新版）》的教材評(píng)估.pdf

1、南京師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文一套非英語(yǔ)專業(yè)教材的評(píng)估方案——針對(duì)《大學(xué)英語(yǔ)（全新版）》的教材評(píng)估姓名：孟暉申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)言文學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：王文琴20080401AbstractAsamajorcomponentintheimplementationofanEnglishcourse，acoursebookisbestseenasanessentialfactorcontributingtotheaccomplishmentof

2、teachingcontentandtheachievementofteachingobjectivesItssignificanceisselfevidentlyjustifiedandcannotbeneglectedparticularlyforChinesecollegestudentswhostillgreatlyrelyoncoursebooksbothinandoutoftheclassroomWiththereformo

3、fcollegeEnglishteaching，avarietyofcoursebooksinlinewiththeNationalCollegeEnglishSyllabus(1999)havebeencompiledandpublishedfornon—EnglishmajorstudentsatpresentinChinaThecoursebookusedasanexamplefortheevaluationisCollegeEn

4、gl西h(New)(henceforthCEN)whichisjustoneofthesepopularcoursebooksandhasbeenadoptedinmanycollegesanduniversitiessinceitsfirstedition(2000Thethesisattemptstoconductasystematicandcomprehensiveanalysisandevaluationofthisseries

5、ofcollegeEnglishcoursebookbasedontheconcemedevaluationtheoriesandstatisticsoftwareofSPSS140Theauthorinitiallyreviewssomerelevanttheoreticalprincipleslinguistictheories，languagelearningtheoriesandsyllabustheoriesformateri

6、alevaluationanddevelopmentrespectivelyObtainingmuchinspirationfromELF(Englishlanguageteaching)materialevaluationtheories，theauthorsetsupaworkingmodelthatincludestwoprocesses，preliminaryevaluation(theanalysisofthematerial

7、笛itis)andinUSeevaluation(takingstudentsandteachers’viewsintoconsideration)Inthepreliminaryevaluationtheauthoranalyzesthecoursebookfromtheaspectsofitspackage，compiler’Sclaims，anditemanalysisofvocabularygrammarskills，socia

8、lculturalcontentlanguageinputandthevarietyoftextSubsequentlysheusesLittlejohn’S(1998)TaskAnalysisSheetandtwospecifiedquestionstOevaluatethetasktypesdesignedinCENInordertOmaketheauthor’Sjudgmentinthepreliminaryevaluationl

9、essbiased，aninUSeevaluationisconductedbyadministeringquestionnairesandinterviewstOsophomorestudentsofthreedifferentmajorsatXuzhouInstituteofTechnologytoinvestigatetheirbeliefsconcerningthepresentationandthetasktypesofCEN

10、TheresultsofdataanalysisgenerallycorrespondwiththeauthorsjudgmentinthepreliminaryevaluationAccordinglythestrengthsandweaknessesoftheseriesofCENarespecifiedrespectivelyBasedontheevaluation，CollegeEnglish(New)seriesaimstoc