版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、遼寧師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文韓非“法治”思想新探姓名:李波申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):中國(guó)古典文學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:邊家珍20080509AbstractContent:HanFeiisthemasterofthepreQinLegalistsOnthebasisofideologicalresourcesofthePreQinScholars,hebuilt“ruleoflaw”ideologybasedonhumannatureview,histo
2、ryviewandillogicalviewHanFei’s“ruleofiaw’ideologyhasbeena12therageatthetimebecauseitguidedthepoliticalpracticeofQinDynasty;however,sincetheQindown,itsfatebegantodeclineandtherewasnoagreementamongmanyviewsofevaluationonlt
3、svalueBeginningwiththesocialbackgroundthisarticlediscussestherootoftheideologyandtherelationshipbetweenConfucian,Taoists,andMohist,beingestablishedinphilosophyofHartFei,sideologyexplainsthecombinationof“fa”“shu”and“shi”p
4、oliticaltheoreticalsystem,anddeductsthebasictrainofthoughtsforsocietygoverningThedissertationanalyzesFeudalismAbsolutismidiosyncracyrevealedbyHanFei’s“ruleoflaw’ideologyandtrieshardtostudytheideologyobjectivelyThedissert
5、ationconsistsoffourmajorchapters:Chapter1TheoreticaIoriginsofHanFei’s‘ruleofiaw”ideology,HanFeiabsorbedthecharacterofConfucian“ruleofli”inheritedthephilosophicalfoundationofTaoist“daofa’to‘‘ruleoflaw’’extended‘‘shangtong
6、’’ideologyoftheMohistHealsolearnedideologicalSOUlfromearlyLegalistssuchasShenZi,GuanZi,ShangYang,ShenBuhai,integrated“l(fā)ifazhizhi’’‘‘yindaoquanfa’’propositionandultimatelyformacomplete‘ruleoflaw’ideologyChapter2Philosophi
7、calfoundationofHanFei’s“ruleoflaw’ideologyHanFei’sunderstandingofhumannatureisthelogicalstartingpointforallhistheoriesHethinkshumannatureloveprofits,andtailorednomologicalmethodofpunishmentandrewardReflectedinits“ruleofl
8、aw”ideologyheexpectsthemonarchydefeatthepoliticalconflictandstrugglewithpoweranddominatethesocietyeffectivelywith“shu’’and“shi”H觚Fei’s“ruleofIaw”ideologyusepracticalsuchapracticalutilitariantohetpthemonarchtounifytheworl
9、dChapter3BasicpropositionofHallFei’s“ruleoflaw”ideologyHanFeiadvocatesregalitytheoryof“dictatorship”withlawandconvincedthat“l(fā)awisnotnobility”and“clueItortureandheavypenalties”penaltyideologyHeupholdsthesupremacythatthees
10、tablishmentandmaintenanceoftheabsolutemonarchy,“fa”,“shu,’and“shi”areimportantmeanstoguaranteetheheavenlinessandparamountcyoftheregalityChapter4AuthoritarianidiosyncracyofHanFei’s“ruleoflaw’ideologyThebasicpropositionofH
11、anFei’s“ruleoflaw”ideologyhasnothingincommonwiththemodemmeaningHis“ruleoflaw’ideologicalsystemisactuallyultimategoalandthe“ruleoflaw’onlytheimplementationofamannerAsotherhistoricalheritagedrossandessencecoexistinHanFei’s
12、“ruleoflaw’ideologyandreasonablefactorsandnegativefactorsbothincludesWeneedtoinvestigateandanalyzeindepthdetailedandobjectivelyWeshouldrethinkitshistoricallimitationsprofoundlyandprovideasalutarylessontoChinesemodem‘rule
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 韓非“法治”思想新探.pdf
- 韓非“法治”思想研究.pdf
- 論韓非的“法治”思想.pdf
- 《韓非子》法治思想研究.pdf
- 韓非子法治思想研究
- 性惡與法治——韓非法治思想研究.pdf
- 商鞅韓非“法治”思想比較研究.pdf
- 韓非“法治”思想的哲學(xué)分析.pdf
- 商鞅韓非法治思想比較研究.pdf
- 韓非法治思想的道德審視.pdf
- 韓非“法治”思想及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值研究.pdf
- 韓非“法治”思想及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值研究
- 韓非子法治思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值.pdf
- 韓非子法治思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值
- 論韓非法治思想及現(xiàn)實(shí)意義.pdf
- 韓非子法治思想及當(dāng)代價(jià)值研究.pdf
- 韓非“法治”思想及其對(duì)當(dāng)代社會(huì)管理的啟示.pdf
- 10561.韓非“法治”思想及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值研究(1)
- 韓非“法治”思想及其對(duì)當(dāng)代社會(huì)管理的啟示
- 韓非利害思想研究.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論